Tacoma wrote:Agreed. I don't get the "empty calories" dig at DD. He was #1 option during Raptors best stretch of seasons in which he led us in scoring to three 50+ win seasons.
He filled possessions. Lowry was driving our offense more than DeRozan overall, though obviously his low turnover rate was helpful to us in terms of ORTG, as was his ability to get to the foul line. He was a decent player for us, to be sure.
So if he's empty calories then what is Brandon Ingram? In his 9-year career, he's led his team to ZERO 50-win seasons.
That's a team-level achievement, so it isn't really relevant. That said, Ingram isn't in a different tier than DeRozan. He's a better shooter, better ball-handler and playmaker, but he's similar in terms of overall value as a scorer. And his health is an issue. Similar in overall offensive impact. And Old DeRozan is aging better (at least for RS purposes) than Ingram has thus far, which is also a credit to Demar and his incremental improvement and work ethic, for sure.
Playoffs? He has to reach it first but he's only made the playoffs twice in his career, never past 1st round. So if DD was "content to score 20-25 a night and not win," why did we trade for Ingram who's an even more empty calories guy, and often injured?
I imagine because the team wants to start winning more games immediately so it looks like they're making forward progress and we can get back to the 8th-seed treadmill, then hope to improve from there. He's a step forward compared to what we had, and the deal offered was pretty decent.
I think "empty calories" is probably a little much with Demar. He wasn't a title-level #1, but he did some things pretty well. He certainly folded like a cheap suit in the playoffs due to his style of play and he was a terrible defender, but in terms of possession control, he did a good job. And he shouldered the primary scoring load for us at a decent level for a team at the level Toronto played at during that stretch.