Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
HumbleRen wrote:Tripod wrote:LoveMyRaps wrote:I'm stupid high on Mogbo
I think he has Pascal potential.
That's bold.
People always fall for the late March/April games lol.
Siakam was the 2nd scoring option on a championship team by the time he was Mogbo’s age.
TDots97 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Tripod wrote:That's bold.
People always fall for the late March/April games lol.
Siakam was the 2nd scoring option on a championship team by the time he was Mogbo’s age.
not true, he was on the bench mob (age 23, 2017-18 season)
Thaddy wrote:Brinbe wrote:WuTang_OG wrote:
Seriously great to see. You don't often see this level of togetherness for a team in the bottom 10 of the lottery. They will surprise a lot of folk next season. Just compare where they were to end last season to now and it's already a 180.
I'll trade that togetherness for a top lottery pick. That isn't going to win this team a playoff series, but talent would.
TDots97 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:Tripod wrote:That's bold.
People always fall for the late March/April games lol.
Siakam was the 2nd scoring option on a championship team by the time he was Mogbo’s age.
not true, he was on the bench mob (age 23, 2017-18 season)
LoveMyRaps wrote:TDots97 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
People always fall for the late March/April games lol.
Siakam was the 2nd scoring option on a championship team by the time he was Mogbo’s age.
not true, he was on the bench mob (age 23, 2017-18 season)
Exactly.
Siakam and Mogbo at the age of 23 have eerily similar stats.
Both played 20ppg:
Mogbo 6ppg / 5rpg / 2apg / 0.8spg / 0.5bpg
Siakam 7ppg / 5rpg / 2apg / 0.8spg / 0.5bpg
It's still a bold prediction on my part to suggest Mogbo can be the next Siakam, but I really love what I'm seeing from Mogbo.
Grew wrote:Thaddy wrote:Grew wrote:
Ok so you're either a troll, the worst poster on here, or I'm arguing with someone with special needs. If you can find someone else on here who believes you, I would be seriously interested in their argument for you.
We can have a discussion once you learn how to make constructive posts and not make personal attacks like calling me "special needs".
It is apparent that we cannot. Special needs would have been a compliment, a way for this to not be as ridiculous as you have made it. You're either a liar or delusional and every one of your posts has an undertone of calling me an idiot along with everyone else who looked at the facts and came to the obvious conclusion that you plagiarized that post. So the discussion is over.