kwamebargnani wrote:Comparable to what? Varejao's long term contract + Mo's long term contract + maybe Hickson?
Comparable in terms of best offer out there. If it was just Bosh being traded, then I'd probably roll the dice with Bynum. If it meant getting rid of Hedo and Jose, I'd definitely consider a Cleveland package. Varejao's contract may be long, but it's commensurate with his play. Mo's better than Jose and his contract is a little cheaper.
cold5 wrote:What leverage do the Cavs have at all over you guys? They have close to no young talent at all excluding ok talent in Hickson and Green, certainly not enough to deal a franchise player for, horrible contracts on the book, their star is a free agent and if they get Bosh, how do they have the money for both of them?, and they cannot sign Bosh outright. LOL.
This isn't about Cleveland's leverage, or getting "fair value" for All Star. This will play out one of two ways.
A) Bosh makes a firm decision and chooses a team with enough cap space to sign him outright. The return in any S&T will be pure garbage, it doesn't matter if it's NY, Chicago, Miami, whomever.
B) Bosh gives Colangelo a list, which includes capped out teams he's willing to play for if a trade can be worked out (i.e. LA, Cleveland)
The best possible package available to Toronto will be from a capped out team. If it meant dumping some of our other horrible contracts, I think Cleveland's offer bears consideration even though it wouldn't match the upside of a Bynum package. Cleveland will easily have enough money for Bosh+LeBron since they'd be sending a ton of salary the other way. Obviously, Bosh would probably discuss things with LeBron before agreeing to such a trade.