wegotthabeet wrote:Rapsfan07 wrote:wegotthabeet wrote:
It depends on total years in the league, an undrafted rookie making the vet min is roughly $1.3 mil. They could save maybe 700k by keeping the 9th overall pick.
Either way the motivation for trading down wouldn't be saving $. You trade down because the player you like is likely to be there at 13 and you also really like a couple other prospects in the 22 range.
I was all for moving down but now I'm not so sure.
From a team needs perspective, we really should be looking at bigs. There'll be a ton of competent Cs in the second round so I'm not worried about that but we don't really have a viable backup PF. I'm not sold on Mogbo being much more than an energy, end of roster guy as he's very raw and doesn't have much to offer on the offensive end. That said, I think the guy we "should" go for is Fleming.
IMO #9 feels a little rich for him and if you trade down for #13 & #22, there's no guarantee he's going to be there - let alone the other quality prospects you would have also missed out on like Kasp or Coward.
Now I like Kasp but there's no way we can draft everyone. Seeing that we already have IQ and there's nothing about Kasp that I've seen so far that guarantees me he's an upgrade to IQ, I think we should take Fleming instead. If we could trade Dick for a mid first to grab Coward and use the second rounder on a C, that's as good a draft as we could hope for.
It really depends on who they like and who’s still available at 9, but I think Fleming is probably still on the board at 13. Fleming + Sorber would be a great draft. Coward might still be available in the second round.
Not a chance Coward is available in the second round. I'd be surprised if he's still on the board after the mid-first.
I don't hate Sorber but I wouldn't take him over Coward when I could just grab Condon, Kalkbrenner or maybe even Broome in the second round. There isn't a big enough difference in potential, role and impact between these guys and Sorber to me.