ImageImageImageImageImage

M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer

johanliebert
RealGM
Posts: 10,516
And1: 6,017
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#121 » by johanliebert » Sun Feb 4, 2018 4:52 pm

MavCarter wrote:I bet half the people on here want to trade norm just for the sake of making a trade lmao

And I isn’t understand why he has stans. He has never been consistent and or played well over allege sample size. It’s been two years of playin a good game every 10.

Also what makes you think he doesn’t want to be moved? He’s out of the rotation he only been play9ng recently because Miles was our for 3 games.
johanliebert
RealGM
Posts: 10,516
And1: 6,017
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
 

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#122 » by johanliebert » Sun Feb 4, 2018 4:53 pm

I’m just happy cj is back so this guy is back out of the rotation. Fred and og have taken his spot ..Fred hs already done more on the court in 2 months than Powell has done in 2 years.

They can find somebody else to hit open 3;s
User avatar
Cool-Hand-Luke
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,323
And1: 2,530
Joined: Jan 30, 2010
Location: Follow me on TWITTER!
Contact:

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#123 » by Cool-Hand-Luke » Sun Feb 4, 2018 5:00 pm

Honestly, this is not surprising. What could we get for him though?
Image
sig by TZ
User avatar
BramptonYute
Head Coach
Posts: 6,847
And1: 8,677
Joined: Mar 14, 2013
     

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#124 » by BramptonYute » Sun Feb 4, 2018 5:10 pm

he should only be traded in package for a third star
MavCarter
RealGM
Posts: 17,773
And1: 31,376
Joined: Mar 07, 2016
Location: Toronto
     

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#125 » by MavCarter » Sun Feb 4, 2018 5:18 pm

johanliebert wrote:
MavCarter wrote:I bet half the people on here want to trade norm just for the sake of making a trade lmao

And I isn’t understand why he has stans. He has never been consistent and or played well over allege sample size. It’s been two years of playin a good game every 10.

Also what makes you think he doesn’t want to be moved? He’s out of the rotation he only been play9ng recently because Miles was our for 3 games.


I'm a stan because i don't want him traded at his lowest value for garbage?
#Enjoytheride
VanWest82
RealGM
Posts: 19,642
And1: 18,148
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#126 » by VanWest82 » Sun Feb 4, 2018 5:20 pm

RaptorsLife wrote:I would much rather trade Cj miles. let Powell gets mins after that. raise his value than trade him at draft

This is what I was suggesting in the FA/Trade thread. Let's trade CJ to OKC (via their designated injured player exception) for a couple of 2nd round picks like Phoenix did with the Tucker trade last year.

OKC needs another wing with Roberson out, and just more shooting in general. We need to make room for the guy we just gave 42M, and we gain financial flexibility to deal with guys like FVV in the offseason, not to mention replenish some of our lost pick capital.
User avatar
OAKLEY_2
RealGM
Posts: 20,206
And1: 9,190
Joined: Dec 19, 2008

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#127 » by OAKLEY_2 » Sun Feb 4, 2018 6:15 pm

sule wrote:
OAKLEY_2 wrote:
MavCarter wrote:People are so eager to trade powell for trash. Yikes


Powell/CJ/JV future pick
For
Kemba/CodyZ

Works in the trade machine.

Fred can be traded high for a pick.


Ok...now you gotta tell us...Bryan Colangelo or Dell Demps or Billy King? Surely you must be one of these people with a proposal like that? :lol:


Oh so you are saying Charlotte is fleecing us? Seriously - MJ if anyone, is the one hanging up.
User avatar
OAKLEY_2
RealGM
Posts: 20,206
And1: 9,190
Joined: Dec 19, 2008

Re: RE: Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#128 » by OAKLEY_2 » Sun Feb 4, 2018 6:17 pm

alienchild wrote:
Mr Swagtastic wrote:
OAKLEY_2 wrote:
Powell/CJ/JV future pick
For
Kemba/CodyZ

Works in the trade machine.

Fred can be traded high for a pick.


So your plan is to trade useful players who fill roles here for a star in Kemba who plays the same position as our highest paid player. Plus we have VanVleet and Wright playing really good. Seems like a short sighted move. Especially since your handing out a pick as well.


Short-sighted is such a kind way to say what you really mean.



Am thinking KL succession plan.
icoholic
Pro Prospect
Posts: 804
And1: 1,086
Joined: Jul 07, 2006

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#129 » by icoholic » Sun Feb 4, 2018 6:24 pm

Powell for TRoss
Mr Swagtastic
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 21,010
And1: 3,450
Joined: Dec 29, 2005
Location: Jurassic Park
         

Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#130 » by Mr Swagtastic » Sun Feb 4, 2018 6:31 pm

OAKLEY_2 wrote:
alienchild wrote:
Mr Swagtastic wrote:
So your plan is to trade useful players who fill roles here for a star in Kemba who plays the same position as our highest paid player. Plus we have VanVleet and Wright playing really good. Seems like a short sighted move. Especially since your handing out a pick as well.


Short-sighted is such a kind way to say what you really mean.



Am thinking KL succession plan.


With a UFA in 18 months? Seems like a backwards way of looking at things especially since Kyle Lowrys deal runs longer and is making almost 3x as much.
Lord Leoshes wrote:i personally would rather keep Chalmers over Lowry
FluLikeSymptoms
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,112
And1: 8,713
Joined: Nov 26, 2004
Location: TBD

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#131 » by FluLikeSymptoms » Sun Feb 4, 2018 6:35 pm

I don’t know why MJ would want Kyle.
User avatar
LBJKB24MJ23
RealGM
Posts: 23,275
And1: 21,649
Joined: Jan 22, 2014
Location: Bermuda
     

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#132 » by LBJKB24MJ23 » Sun Feb 4, 2018 7:31 pm

this whole thread is pure garbage. it should really be shut down. he can't be traded
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.
AkelaLoneWolf
RealGM
Posts: 18,097
And1: 13,637
Joined: Apr 09, 2008

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#133 » by AkelaLoneWolf » Sun Feb 4, 2018 7:40 pm

DreamTeam09 wrote:This is crazy to me because FVV despite how good he is playing is a 3rd string pg here. I’m taking Delon and norm and would much rather pay them their value rather than FVV and pay him whatever he is going to get. Y’all are in the what have you done for me lately stage, which is fine and fair. FVV has outplayed both of them this year and I’d much rather go fwd with both Delon and Norm rather than FVV.

understatement of the year...
you want to go with delon and norm despite the fact that fvv has outplayed them? And remember fvv was showing sparks last year too; he was a little too wild and out of control then. delon and norm haven't made any significant leaps in their games, not to mention they're older i.e. they're getting close to their ceilings while fvv still on the way up.
"We're the middle children of history. No purpose or place. We have no Great War. No Great Depression. Our great war is a spiritual war. Our great depression is our lives." - Tyler Durden in Fight Club.
User avatar
Psubs
RealGM
Posts: 20,806
And1: 11,890
Joined: Nov 20, 2004
Location: Toronto

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#134 » by Psubs » Sun Feb 4, 2018 7:56 pm

AkelaLoneWolf wrote:
DreamTeam09 wrote:This is crazy to me because FVV despite how good he is playing is a 3rd string pg here. I’m taking Delon and norm and would much rather pay them their value rather than FVV and pay him whatever he is going to get. Y’all are in the what have you done for me lately stage, which is fine and fair. FVV has outplayed both of them this year and I’d much rather go fwd with both Delon and Norm rather than FVV.

understatement of the year...
you want to go with delon and norm despite the fact that fvv has outplayed them? And remember fvv was showing sparks last year too; he was a little too wild and out of control then. delon and norm haven't made any significant leaps in their games, not to mention they're older i.e. they're getting close to their ceilings while fvv still on the way up.


FVV's floor is now Damon Stoudamire! 8-) His ceiling may be Lowry. :D
Image
XxIronChainzxX
RealGM
Posts: 14,457
And1: 7,665
Joined: Oct 22, 2004
   

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#135 » by XxIronChainzxX » Sun Feb 4, 2018 8:01 pm

VanWest82 wrote:
RaptorsLife wrote:I would much rather trade Cj miles. let Powell gets mins after that. raise his value than trade him at draft

This is what I was suggesting in the FA/Trade thread. Let's trade CJ to OKC (via their designated injured player exception) for a couple of 2nd round picks like Phoenix did with the Tucker trade last year.

OKC needs another wing with Roberson out, and just more shooting in general. We need to make room for the guy we just gave 42M, and we gain financial flexibility to deal with guys like FVV in the offseason, not to mention replenish some of our lost pick capital.


Where is the offense coming from on the bench? 2nd round picks aren't really pick capital despite Masai doing well on them lately. Norm isn't playing well so far, so losing CJ to make room for Norm to play himself into shape is a bad win now move, when the East is more open than ever. Next year even if Cleveland totally collapse Boston gets better just with Hayward coming back and their young players getting older. I'm not disagreeing on potentially moving CJ to make room, but I think that's an offseason move.
djsunyc
RealGM
Posts: 99,862
And1: 73,706
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#136 » by djsunyc » Sun Feb 4, 2018 8:03 pm

rename thread to "M.Sotto: I don't know how the NBA CBA works"
User avatar
nitrous
General Manager
Posts: 8,718
And1: 11,470
Joined: Apr 12, 2010
 

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#137 » by nitrous » Sun Feb 4, 2018 8:06 pm

djsunyc wrote:rename thread to "M.Sotto: I don't know how the NBA CBA works"


But if he has sources, possible they know something we don't?
VanWest82
RealGM
Posts: 19,642
And1: 18,148
Joined: Dec 05, 2008

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#138 » by VanWest82 » Sun Feb 4, 2018 8:11 pm

XxIronChainzxX wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:
RaptorsLife wrote:I would much rather trade Cj miles. let Powell gets mins after that. raise his value than trade him at draft

This is what I was suggesting in the FA/Trade thread. Let's trade CJ to OKC (via their designated injured player exception) for a couple of 2nd round picks like Phoenix did with the Tucker trade last year.

OKC needs another wing with Roberson out, and just more shooting in general. We need to make room for the guy we just gave 42M, and we gain financial flexibility to deal with guys like FVV in the offseason, not to mention replenish some of our lost pick capital.


Where is the offense coming from on the bench? 2nd round picks aren't really pick capital despite Masai doing well on them lately. Norm isn't playing well so far, so losing CJ to make room for Norm to play himself into shape is a bad win now move, when the East is more open than ever. Next year even if Cleveland totally collapse Boston gets better just with Hayward coming back and their young players getting older. I'm not disagreeing on potentially moving CJ to make room, but I think that's an offseason move.

Think you might be overvaluing CJ's contributions...but yes obviously it hurts our depth and spacing some on the second unit. Powell looks like he's starting to turn the corner though, and long-term he's the more important piece.

Personally, I think getting Powell back on track is more important than the other considerations. We'll need his athleticism come playoffs. But the picks and future cap flexibility is probably worth the trade all by itself IMO and you're more likely to get a better return from a team desperate to win at the trade deadline than a team that has all the time in the world to figure out end of rotation spots in July.
YogiStewart
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,035
And1: 6,491
Joined: Aug 08, 2007
Location: Its ALL about Location, Location, Location!

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#139 » by YogiStewart » Sun Feb 4, 2018 8:12 pm

LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:this whole thread is pure garbage. it should really be shut down. he can't be traded

LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:this whole thread is pure garbage. it should really be shut down. he can't be traded

LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:this whole thread is pure garbage. it should really be shut down. he can't be traded

LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:this whole thread is pure garbage. it should really be shut down. he can't be traded

LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:this whole thread is pure garbage. it should really be shut down. he can't be traded

LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:this whole thread is pure garbage. it should really be shut down. he can't be traded

LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:this whole thread is pure garbage. it should really be shut down. he can't be traded
XxIronChainzxX
RealGM
Posts: 14,457
And1: 7,665
Joined: Oct 22, 2004
   

Re: M.Scotto: Toronto made Powell available in trade discussions 

Post#140 » by XxIronChainzxX » Sun Feb 4, 2018 8:14 pm

VanWest82 wrote:
XxIronChainzxX wrote:
VanWest82 wrote:This is what I was suggesting in the FA/Trade thread. Let's trade CJ to OKC (via their designated injured player exception) for a couple of 2nd round picks like Phoenix did with the Tucker trade last year.

OKC needs another wing with Roberson out, and just more shooting in general. We need to make room for the guy we just gave 42M, and we gain financial flexibility to deal with guys like FVV in the offseason, not to mention replenish some of our lost pick capital.


Where is the offense coming from on the bench? 2nd round picks aren't really pick capital despite Masai doing well on them lately. Norm isn't playing well so far, so losing CJ to make room for Norm to play himself into shape is a bad win now move, when the East is more open than ever. Next year even if Cleveland totally collapse Boston gets better just with Hayward coming back and their young players getting older. I'm not disagreeing on potentially moving CJ to make room, but I think that's an offseason move.

Think you might be overvaluing CJ's contributions...but yes obviously it hurts our depth and spacing some on the second unit. Powell looks like he's starting to turn the corner though, and long-term he's the more important piece.

Personally, I think getting Powell back on track is more important than anything else. We'll need his athleticism come playoffs. But the picks and future cap flexibility is definitely worth the trade all by itself IMO.


I think you're underrating CJ. We're playing a lot of straight bench units, and going with Powell at the 3 with FVV and Norm gets us undersized even though Powell is a good defender. His weakness right now go beyond being cold, he needs to expand his game a bit and he's not a catch & shoot 3 point player. Again, I don't disagree with you philosophically but I think it takes more than CJ's minutes for the reason of the season for Norm to recover.

I think being in a position to take the 1st seed or stay locked in 2nd with the Cavs fluctuating seeding matters a lot more. If we struggle in the RS it will start creating problems for the team generally.

Return to Toronto Raptors