ImageImageImageImageImage

Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) **Presser at 5:15pm** Link Pg. 24

Moderators: 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

Good Deal?

Yes
208
85%
No
38
15%
 
Total votes: 246

Kreamy
RealGM
Posts: 15,669
And1: 2,306
Joined: Aug 26, 2001
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#121 » by Kreamy » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:50 pm

Great asset management and contract by the Raps. If we draft Flagg or Bailey and decide to move Ingram in a year or so, we'll recoup everything we gave up and then some, assuming he's healthy.
User avatar
junot111
General Manager
Posts: 9,441
And1: 3,328
Joined: Jan 31, 2007

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#122 » by junot111 » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:52 pm

How can anyone be upset about this lol it's as fair as it gets
User avatar
bluerap23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,176
And1: 7,303
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
   

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#123 » by bluerap23 » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:52 pm

Consequence wrote:
djsunyc wrote:
Consequence wrote:I'm fine with the number in abstract but I'm not a huge fan of how little tax wiggle room there is this offseason, especially if the lottery gods come through.


the team has until the 2026 draft to get under the luxury tax if they don't want to pay it.


Yup, just think that it will be a more painful process if they do have to do so now.


'They aren't really in danger of being in the tax.


Image
Image
User avatar
LoveMyRaps
RealGM
Posts: 29,457
And1: 49,758
Joined: Jun 10, 2013
       

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#124 » by LoveMyRaps » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:54 pm

bluerap23 wrote:
Consequence wrote:
djsunyc wrote:
the team has until the 2026 draft to get under the luxury tax if they don't want to pay it.


Yup, just think that it will be a more painful process if they do have to do so now.


'They aren't really in danger of being in the tax.


Image


Oh man why'd you have brings the facts and numbers out... you know Masai haters don't like that.
In Masai We Trust :meditate:
Image
User avatar
LarSiN
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,603
And1: 1,587
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
       

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#125 » by LarSiN » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:54 pm

TimeForChange wrote:Where are all the posters who thought he would sign a deal starting at $34m? :lol:

This organization is so predictable.


You're exhausting
"I quickly cripple the triple-threat devils, disheveled I level headedly settle on spontaneous combustion tactics. Fact is, nothing is drastic or graphic. I melt the steel like blacksmiths"
Zeno
RealGM
Posts: 24,757
And1: 23,003
Joined: Jun 06, 2001
   

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#126 » by Zeno » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:54 pm

I don’t love the player option but we will be able to approach him on an extension right around the 2027 deadline. So in theory we can trade him then if he doesn’t want to resign.
When will we just change the name of 25 of the 30 teams to the Washington Generals?

Please advise….

Dan G.
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 12,978
And1: 12,339
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#127 » by Tripod » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:55 pm

This deal gives us flexibility which MU wants.

Added our likely top scorer for a 1st+expirings
Short deal to prove injuries were a NO thing
If injuries pile up, it's still a short deal that can be moved
If he plays great, we can re-sign him or move his still

It's low enough we "could" do nothing this offseason depending on where we draft. But we could move RJ, Ochai, or just trade Gradey/Walter for a future pick. Or a cheaper backup C.

We have the big hole at backup C...and extra SG. So likely something happens. But fir now, we wait till draft day!

Also, he waived his trade kicker to help us out this year. So I view his deal as also getting that 2.1 mill back.
Godaddycurse
RealGM
Posts: 22,310
And1: 14,199
Joined: Nov 13, 2019
 

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#128 » by Godaddycurse » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:55 pm

bluerap23 wrote:
Consequence wrote:
djsunyc wrote:
the team has until the 2026 draft to get under the luxury tax if they don't want to pay it.


Yup, just think that it will be a more painful process if they do have to do so now.


'They aren't really in danger of being in the tax.


Image


As it stands if our pick is 5th or higher we will be in the tax
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,355
And1: 14,396
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#129 » by dagger » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:55 pm

ForeverTFC wrote:
Consequence wrote:I'm fine with the number in abstract but I'm not a huge fan of how little tax wiggle room there is this offseason, especially if the lottery gods come through.


Barrett or IQ will be moved for sure within a year


I don't think we can assume anything until we know who the team drafts in June. If it's a point guard, it certainly makes na IQ trade more likely, especially after knocking another season off of his flat-lined contract. If it's a wing, then maybe RJ becomes more likely, but if it's a C or PF, who knows. If it's Flagg, I doubt the team will worry about the tax, only keeping under the first apron, because financially, he'd be good for playoff revenues (it's the East, playoffs will not be an unreasonable goal), higher TV ad sales, merchandise sales etc
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
TimeForChange
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,636
And1: 4,929
Joined: Dec 23, 2023

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#130 » by TimeForChange » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:55 pm

ForeverTFC wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:Where are all the posters who thought he would sign a deal starting at $34m? :lol:

This organization is so predictable.


I mean, it does start at $37 if you factor in max raises which most were. Is that so far off?

Are you sure it starts at 37m? :lol:
wegotthabeet
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,559
And1: 3,082
Joined: Jun 29, 2021
 

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#131 » by wegotthabeet » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:56 pm

LoveMyRaps wrote:
TheGeneral99 wrote:Wow - Ingram gets the Vanvleet contract.


Fred got more.


Not really. Fred got a team option, not a player option.
ratul
General Manager
Posts: 7,871
And1: 4,450
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Location: Toronto/NYC
     

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#132 » by ratul » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:56 pm

Pascal and norm were better fits
User avatar
TimeForChange
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,636
And1: 4,929
Joined: Dec 23, 2023

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#133 » by TimeForChange » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:57 pm

I still think one of RJ or IQ will be moved before or during next season.

No way does this team pay the tax.
User avatar
Prestige
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,039
And1: 4,663
Joined: Jan 17, 2011
Location: The secret impresses no one. The trick you use it for is everything.
 

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#134 » by Prestige » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:57 pm

Looks like the FO is all set to dip out of the lottery and compete for the playoffs next season. No multi-season tank/rebuild like many were musing. At least not intentionally.
User avatar
LarSiN
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,603
And1: 1,587
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
       

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#135 » by LarSiN » Tue Feb 11, 2025 8:58 pm

Fantastic deal, glad it's taken care of
"I quickly cripple the triple-threat devils, disheveled I level headedly settle on spontaneous combustion tactics. Fact is, nothing is drastic or graphic. I melt the steel like blacksmiths"
djsunyc
RealGM
Posts: 100,034
And1: 73,896
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#136 » by djsunyc » Tue Feb 11, 2025 9:00 pm

Read on Twitter
User avatar
ImaBeatDatAzz
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,979
And1: 4,339
Joined: May 07, 2017
Location: Toronto
   

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#137 » by ImaBeatDatAzz » Tue Feb 11, 2025 9:00 pm

Ok pretty solid
114-110... "Curry lets it fly...CANADA THE NBA TITLE IS YOURS."
User avatar
ForeverTFC
RealGM
Posts: 18,047
And1: 19,718
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
         

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#138 » by ForeverTFC » Tue Feb 11, 2025 9:01 pm

TimeForChange wrote:
ForeverTFC wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:Where are all the posters who thought he would sign a deal starting at $34m? :lol:

This organization is so predictable.


I mean, it does start at $37 if you factor in max raises which most were. Is that so far off?

Are you sure it starts at 37m? :lol:


If it starts higher, it means he's getting smaller raises. The starting point is somewhat irrelevant, the AAV is what matters. The people citing a $34m starting salary were all attaching max raises to it. They were off by a couple million. So what are you laughing at exactly? Your own ignorance and inability to do math?
User avatar
bluerap23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,176
And1: 7,303
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
   

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#139 » by bluerap23 » Tue Feb 11, 2025 9:02 pm

Godaddycurse wrote:
bluerap23 wrote:
Consequence wrote:
Yup, just think that it will be a more painful process if they do have to do so now.


'They aren't really in danger of being in the tax.


Image


As it stands if our pick is 5th or higher we will be in the tax


Not if we role with a 13man roster plus 2-ways.
Image
User avatar
LarSiN
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,603
And1: 1,587
Joined: Jul 20, 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canada
       

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#140 » by LarSiN » Tue Feb 11, 2025 9:03 pm

M3tro wrote:We better hit on this draft of we're fooked.


I mean ... we just hit on all 4 of our picks last year, I think we'll be okay
"I quickly cripple the triple-threat devils, disheveled I level headedly settle on spontaneous combustion tactics. Fact is, nothing is drastic or graphic. I melt the steel like blacksmiths"

Return to Toronto Raptors