ImageImageImageImageImage

PG: Back to .500 (5-5)

Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, Morris_Shatford, lebron stopper

User avatar
Airmiess
Starter
Posts: 2,195
And1: 2,153
Joined: May 30, 2022

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#121 » by Airmiess » Sun Nov 9, 2025 11:55 am

Boselecta wrote:
Airmiess wrote:So Ingram ruined his rep in the league ? on reddit they're showing he threw 2 water bottles and got the staff wet.


Finally some passion on this team. Someone who cares about losing.

So it's really a nothing burger ?
User avatar
canz55
Starter
Posts: 2,273
And1: 2,361
Joined: Aug 13, 2020
       

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#122 » by canz55 » Sun Nov 9, 2025 12:39 pm

Our roster is good but the pieces don't fit for how we play.

Case in point our fast break opportunities leaves a lot to be desired.
ImageWe the Champs...
User avatar
Brinbe
RealGM
Posts: 66,331
And1: 41,115
Joined: Feb 26, 2005
Location: Terana
         

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#123 » by Brinbe » Sun Nov 9, 2025 12:43 pm

The BI tantrum was just weird, especially just going on after like nothing happened. He's usually super chill so that was the most emotional/upset I've ever seen him. I don't know if he apologized or not but if some other random player did that to one of our employees I don't think people on here would be so forgiving. At least I hope not? But some people are just sociopaths I guess?

Anyway, his lack of physicality is something that we knew about before we came here but he was traded for his scoring/midrange ability and he's fulfilled that part of things. I don't think the loss falls on him in any big way. The lack of a real big to deal with Embiid/Drummond off the glass was probably more of a factor imo. Contrary to what ppl think CMB and Scottie aren't really cut out for that role at least in any sustainable way over a full game. They owned us on the glass and in the paint despite shooting worse from 3.
Image
User avatar
Childs
RealGM
Posts: 13,056
And1: 29,239
Joined: Jun 23, 2010
 

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#124 » by Childs » Sun Nov 9, 2025 12:45 pm

Image

Our guards last night.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,723
And1: 23,853
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#125 » by ATLTimekeeper » Sun Nov 9, 2025 12:54 pm

More Mamu, more CMB and more Gradey and we might have won this one. Darko's choice to put Scottie on Embiid was a disaster. Mamu didn't come in until 2 minutes left in the 3rd. He's been our best bench player every single game and we were dying for size all night.

Ingram and Barrett were especially bad defensively. Just repeatedly late and not ready. I wasn't really happy with Scottie's help D, either, but he had a legit impossible match-up to worry about.

Scottie just stood under the basket on 3 possessions where the 76ers got easy transition buckets. He's not a big enough star to do this.
Yallbecrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,906
And1: 5,579
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#126 » by Yallbecrazy » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:02 pm

ATLTimekeeper wrote:More Mamu, more CMB and more Gradey and we might have won this one. Darko's choice to put Scottie on Embiid was a disaster. Mamu didn't come in until 2 minutes left in the 3rd. He's been our best bench player every single game and we were dying for size all night.

Ingram and Barrett were especially bad defensively. Just repeatedly late and not ready. I wasn't really happy with Scottie's help D, either, but he had a legit impossible match-up to worry about.

Scottie just stood under the basket on 3 possessions where the 76ers got easy transition buckets. He's not a big enough star to do this.


He was in foul trouble, issue was not having another big there with him.
MoneyBall
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,807
And1: 4,151
Joined: May 02, 2009

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#127 » by MoneyBall » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:10 pm

Can we take a moment to appreciate CMB's performance? He looked phenomenal, really gave them great minutes off the bench.
User avatar
TorontoBarneys
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,963
And1: 7,114
Joined: Dec 30, 2022
   

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#128 » by TorontoBarneys » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:14 pm

Fanbase wants dirty & mean players and then gets their vaginas in a twist when they act like dicks. :lol:
User avatar
Johnny Bball
RealGM
Posts: 55,145
And1: 59,600
Joined: Feb 01, 2015
 

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#129 » by Johnny Bball » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:18 pm

canz55 wrote:Our roster is good but the pieces don't fit for how we play.

Case in point our fast break opportunities leaves a lot to be desired.


???

They are first in the league in fastbreak points. Pretty sure they said something like that last night.

I think it looked worse last night because you have to rebound to run and well....
User avatar
hyper316
RealGM
Posts: 14,809
And1: 10,117
Joined: Dec 23, 2006
   

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#130 » by hyper316 » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:18 pm

Did Matt/Jack say on broadcast that BI's midrange percentage is highest in the league?
MoneyBall
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,807
And1: 4,151
Joined: May 02, 2009

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#131 » by MoneyBall » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:22 pm

Jstock12 wrote:Feel bad for that guy who got hit by the water bottle. Man is just doing his job providing for his family. Shouldn't get injured by tantrum throwing millionaires who throw a round sphere into a hole for a living. Not apologizing instantly is also super **** weird. I'd understand it if Ingram was some young awkward kid, but dude's almost 30.

Doesn't look like Ingram realized the bottle hit someone, so it doesn't make sense to expect him to apologize right away.

It is ironic that Ingram got a delay of game for trying to shake off pain from an injury and not for deliberately spilling water everywhere lol.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,723
And1: 23,853
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#132 » by ATLTimekeeper » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:28 pm

Yallbecrazy wrote:
ATLTimekeeper wrote:More Mamu, more CMB and more Gradey and we might have won this one. Darko's choice to put Scottie on Embiid was a disaster. Mamu didn't come in until 2 minutes left in the 3rd. He's been our best bench player every single game and we were dying for size all night.

Ingram and Barrett were especially bad defensively. Just repeatedly late and not ready. I wasn't really happy with Scottie's help D, either, but he had a legit impossible match-up to worry about.

Scottie just stood under the basket on 3 possessions where the 76ers got easy transition buckets. He's not a big enough star to do this.


He was in foul trouble, issue was not having another big there with him.


This was even before the foul trouble. I can understand the lack of resistance after the 4th. He has to do a better job of beating players to spots, especially when Poeltl is out.

But like I said, more Mamu and his job gets easier. More CMB and his job gets easier. Less RJ and Ingram and his job gets easier.
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,074
And1: 2,283
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#133 » by Shakril » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:40 pm

TheAlchemist23 wrote:Great first quarter, tried to get back rest of the game but not enough

How many more games would've we won if we had another C? Add this game to the count


To be honest, we lost cause darko had again weird rotations. Why hasnt played Battle more? How bad must someone play until he gots yanked? Ochai, Walter and Dick were awful and Battle still cant get a runway.
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,074
And1: 2,283
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#134 » by Shakril » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:42 pm

I am not angry at the loss itself.
But i am angry that we dont play Battle who clearly is better right now than any of ochai, walter or gradey.

This game could have been won, even without Yak to rebound.
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,074
And1: 2,283
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#135 » by Shakril » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:43 pm

Boardbreaker wrote:Tbh if they knew Jak wouldn’t be playing b2bs why wouldn’t you save him for tonight instead


A win against ATL has the same worth as a win against 76ers.

Againt ATL its easier to win.

I would have done it the same way.

Also ATL was a cup game.
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,074
And1: 2,283
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#136 » by Shakril » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:46 pm

MiamiSPX wrote:
Tor_Raps wrote:
_MidNight_ wrote:Who did we give up a Tribble double to? Lol

I wonder how long they'll go without giving us a true backup center. My bet is on all season.


This will be our 6th year without a real one so...


Poeltl missed 57 games the last 2 seasons and showed up to camp out of shape and hurt. Inexcusable that we don’t have a backup for him.


Most games Poeltl missed, where either due tanking or extreme precaution (tanking). And the reason why he was out of shape, was his back.

I only mention it to say: Dont worry about him. But yeah, a backup C wouldnt be bad. Just someone that can rebound and defend a bit.
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,074
And1: 2,283
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#137 » by Shakril » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:47 pm

dballislife wrote:getting crushed on glass and on d...and yet cmb only plays 22 minutes...we lacked size and he was playing great and grabbed 7 boards


He is still a rookie and he plays out of position. You need to be cautious not to burn him out.
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,074
And1: 2,283
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#138 » by Shakril » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:48 pm

LoveMyRaps wrote:Been a fan of Watford for a while

Wanted him last year

Image



How does he play outside of last night?
YogurtProducer
RealGM
Posts: 30,895
And1: 33,600
Joined: Jul 22, 2013
Location: Saskatchewan
       

Re: PG: Back to .500 (5-5) 

Post#139 » by YogurtProducer » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:58 pm

LoveMyRaps wrote:
bape_lovers wrote:Most likely tired, you can see his shots were front rimming. I still like BI, you need someone in the playoffs.

LoveMyRaps wrote:
He's actually been decent on defense this year. Was horrendous tonight though.


He’s drastically improved our half court offense. We need him.

It’s extremely difficult to acquire a player of his calibre.

It arguing that, just like for a time we needed Demar.

Once you are a serious team though, Ingram gotta go. Hes not elite enough offensively to make up for his defence.

I didn’t say give him away, I just hope he’s the main piece in a consolation trade if one ever were to arise
User avatar
WaltFrazier
RealGM
Posts: 34,194
And1: 31,680
Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
       

Re: PG: Back to .500 

Post#140 » by WaltFrazier » Sun Nov 9, 2025 1:58 pm

Childs wrote:


I caught this incident on TV but didn't know what led to it. What was he upset about?

Is BI a possible bad attitude, or a fiery competitor that you like to see
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.

Return to Toronto Raptors