brownbobcat wrote:JB7 wrote:You do realize they were purposely tanking last year, right? That is 30 wins in spite of trying to lose games.
Going from tanking to then suddenly being good enough to utilize big money on BI - without even having realized the benefit of tanking - is poor strategy.
There is long term tanking - see Utah, Sixers long ago, Wizards, etc.
There is also short term strategic tanking - see Raps (Barnes draft year, last year and the year before), Spurs (when they drafted Duncan), Celtics (maybe this year?).
Tanking does not result in the desired outcome though all the time. There is risk involved. Stripping your team of all its assets to lose for a long time and acquire younger assets can also leave you with younger assets not any better than the assets you had before stripping the team down, and possibly a half a decade of losing to show for it.
Smarter management teams seem to rely on the short term strategic tanking. If the opportunity presents itself, they tank hard for half a season to try to acquire a higher pick in a strong draft.
There are multiple ways to produce a winning team, and tanking isn't the only solution.






















