WuTang_OG wrote:he's gotta go top 10
Doing this on a really good team w good vet players? Zero bust potential. He's legit
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
WuTang_OG wrote:he's gotta go top 10
NotMyKawhi wrote:WuTang_OG wrote:he's gotta go top 10
Doing this on a really good team w good vet players? Zero bust potential. He's legit
Mark_83 wrote:Sleeper who I think has a non-zero chance to turn into a useful piece: Daron Holmes.20-year old PF in a maid major conference.
17.7pts 8reb 1.7ast 2blk
6'10 220 PF with a 7'2 wingspan.
Has a raw but intriguing game that reminds me a little bit of Amir.
58.6%fg 38.5%3fg 65.3%ft
grant101 wrote:Mark_83 wrote:Sleeper who I think has a non-zero chance to turn into a useful piece: Daron Holmes.20-year old PF in a maid major conference.
17.7pts 8reb 1.7ast 2blk
6'10 220 PF with a 7'2 wingspan.
Has a raw but intriguing game that reminds me a little bit of Amir.
58.6%fg 38.5%3fg 65.3%ft
Hell yeah! Been waiting for someone to bring his name up. He's about as a sure thing as there is in this draft. Zero bust potential, and really like the Amir comparison. Not flashy, but I bet he plays in the league for years.
deeps6x wrote:I guarantee you that (Jaylen) Brown and (Kris) Dunn are drafted OUT of the top 5.
BoyzNTheHood wrote:I've BEEN saying it, and just take in that this is against HORRIBLE competition. This kid, and his brother are massive shots in the dark. If you're drafting these kids in the top-10 you're doing it hoping they become something down the line. This is the DEFINITION of 2 years away from being 2 years away.
They have avoided elite competition every step of the way. There's no reason Emoni Bates is a 2nd rounder and the Thompson twins are not. They signed with OTE because they thought they could showcase themselves against bums and no one would notice. But guess what? The stats are here for everyone to see.
40% on LAYUPS
28% on UNGUARDED catch and shoots
The only thing he's decent at are runners, and there's only a 13 shot sample size.
STAY AWAY FROM THE THOMPSON TWINS. They might be worse than the Harrison twins. These kids are NOT first round picks!
?t=NczNjzhLW0z0ErZGhKz4Xw&s=19
Ausar's stars aren't much different. HUGE red flags with these two!
?t=g4NItXiQfF8ZYklJydE5kA&s=19
Qhawe wrote:Just looked at some clips of the projected 5, not all that impressive tbh. Beside's Webanyama of-course.
WuTang_OG wrote:I can already see the Hornets drafting a Thompson only for him to bust and add it to their pile of failed picks
Fairview4Life wrote:WuTang_OG wrote:I can already see the Hornets drafting a Thompson only for him to bust and add it to their pile of failed picks
Y'all want to see a dead body?
https://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/CHA/draft.html
Psubs wrote:Qhawe wrote:Just looked at some clips of the projected 5, not all that impressive tbh. Beside's Webanyama of-course.
You're not impressed with Scoot? He's like Bradley Beal out there and an inch taller playing against G-League players and dominating with NBA range already.
Wembenyama is a taller Chet with more SG skills. After that you're looking at Paul George, Jaylen Brown, Kris Middleton level potential at best.
ItsDanger wrote:Prospects in NCAA are measured in conference play, conference championships, NCAA championship. Conference play typically starts early January.
Therefore, a lot of opinions are formulated by March. Not January, not February. Some may give opinions earlier but season is young and players even younger, they improve throughout the season.
Some of the counter arguments presented on this board are complete BS. Probably never watched a college game in their lives.
Duffman100 wrote:ItsDanger wrote:Prospects in NCAA are measured in conference play, conference championships, NCAA championship. Conference play typically starts early January.
Therefore, a lot of opinions are formulated by March. Not January, not February. Some may give opinions earlier but season is young and players even younger, they improve throughout the season.
Some of the counter arguments presented on this board are complete BS. Probably never watched a college game in their lives.
I'm excited for you to give us your top 1-2 prospects that you want us to draft. So we can make sure we bump your success later on.
God Squad wrote:Duffman100 wrote:ItsDanger wrote:Prospects in NCAA are measured in conference play, conference championships, NCAA championship. Conference play typically starts early January.
Therefore, a lot of opinions are formulated by March. Not January, not February. Some may give opinions earlier but season is young and players even younger, they improve throughout the season.
Some of the counter arguments presented on this board are complete BS. Probably never watched a college game in their lives.
I'm excited for you to give us your top 1-2 prospects that you want us to draft. So we can make sure we bump your success later on.
Good. That's part of the fun of the draft. I'd love to hear his top 5, and yours. But you seem to think it's a fault to be wrong on guys?
Duffman100 wrote:God Squad wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
I'm excited for you to give us your top 1-2 prospects that you want us to draft. So we can make sure we bump your success later on.
Good. That's part of the fun of the draft. I'd love to hear his top 5, and yours. But you seem to think it's a fault to be wrong on guys?
I'm like 95% wrong on all basketball predictions. I've pretty much given up after thinking Thomas Robinson was the next big thing.
Duffman100 wrote:God Squad wrote:Duffman100 wrote:
I'm excited for you to give us your top 1-2 prospects that you want us to draft. So we can make sure we bump your success later on.
Good. That's part of the fun of the draft. I'd love to hear his top 5, and yours. But you seem to think it's a fault to be wrong on guys?
I'm like 95% wrong on all basketball predictions. I've pretty much given up after thinking Thomas Robinson was the next big thing.