WuTang_OG wrote:;ab_channel=LockedOnHornets
I wonder who or what we'd have to attach to jump up to 4.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
WuTang_OG wrote:;ab_channel=LockedOnHornets
PhilBlackson wrote:WuTang_OG wrote:;ab_channel=LockedOnHornets
I wonder who or what we'd have to attach to jump up to 4.
bboyskinnylegs wrote:If we did to this trade down deal, I wonder who we'd be interested in at 19. There's decent talent that will still be there, but it will also be much harder to predict who doesn't get scooped up in the lottery
M3tro wrote:A few mocks have us going with Essengue now
Duffman100 wrote:M3tro wrote:A few mocks have us going with Essengue now
Essengue vs Bryant, what's the main difference other than Bryant can shoot.
I feel if both are at that pick you go Bryant.
BoyzNTheHood wrote:Rapsfan07 wrote:I gotta say - I'm surprised that there is serious debate around moving #9 + Barrett for Johnson and #19.
It's a no for me.
Barrett still has two years left at a fairly reasonable price and is still just 25. Johnson is almost 30
Johnson is injured quite frequently
Johnson plays the same position as our two best players
Plus we have to move 10 spots back in the draft after having to endure this past year of basketball?
This should be a fairly easy no, guys.
People like shiny new rookies. No one analyzes things objectively. If RJ Barrett were in this draft he goes top 3, maybe 2. Even at 23, take RJ’s skill set and put it on an NCAA roster and you’re not trading this guy for the 19th pick and Cam Johnson, much less giving up 9.
HumbleRen wrote:BoyzNTheHood wrote:Rapsfan07 wrote:I gotta say - I'm surprised that there is serious debate around moving #9 + Barrett for Johnson and #19.
It's a no for me.
Barrett still has two years left at a fairly reasonable price and is still just 25. Johnson is almost 30
Johnson is injured quite frequently
Johnson plays the same position as our two best players
Plus we have to move 10 spots back in the draft after having to endure this past year of basketball?
This should be a fairly easy no, guys.
People like shiny new rookies. No one analyzes things objectively. If RJ Barrett were in this draft he goes top 3, maybe 2. Even at 23, take RJ’s skill set and put it on an NCAA roster and you’re not trading this guy for the 19th pick and Cam Johnson, much less giving up 9.
That’s only because RJ would be on a rookie deal lol.
RJ is just not a winning player. I get that he’s Canadian and all that stuff but this is the same trap a lot of Demar fans fell for.
He will always be a guy that every single team wants to upgrade on when they go from a middling team to a team that’s serious about winning.
Knicks won’t be first team, we won’t be the last team, this will be his legacy for every team that he lands on.
There’s not a single playoff team that would take RJ over Johnson.
Duffman100 wrote:M3tro wrote:A few mocks have us going with Essengue now
Essengue vs Bryant, what's the main difference other than Bryant can shoot.
I feel if both are at that pick you go Bryant.
bobbyp3588 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:BoyzNTheHood wrote:People like shiny new rookies. No one analyzes things objectively. If RJ Barrett were in this draft he goes top 3, maybe 2. Even at 23, take RJ’s skill set and put it on an NCAA roster and you’re not trading this guy for the 19th pick and Cam Johnson, much less giving up 9.
That’s only because RJ would be on a rookie deal lol.
RJ is just not a winning player. I get that he’s Canadian and all that stuff but this is the same trap a lot of Demar fans fell for.
He will always be a guy that every single team wants to upgrade on when they go from a middling team to a team that’s serious about winning.
Knicks won’t be first team, we won’t be the last team, this will be his legacy for every team that he lands on.
There’s not a single playoff team that would take RJ over Johnson.
I don’t believe that for a second. And who are you for me to believe. Opinions are like ****. We all have one. Why should we care about yours?
HumbleRen wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
That’s only because RJ would be on a rookie deal lol.
RJ is just not a winning player. I get that he’s Canadian and all that stuff but this is the same trap a lot of Demar fans fell for.
He will always be a guy that every single team wants to upgrade on when they go from a middling team to a team that’s serious about winning.
Knicks won’t be first team, we won’t be the last team, this will be his legacy for every team that he lands on.
There’s not a single playoff team that would take RJ over Johnson.
I don’t believe that for a second. And who are you for me to believe. Opinions are like ****. We all have one. Why should we care about yours?
We literally just tried to trade him at the trade deadline and a team like the poverty Pelicans said nah I’m good on RJ.
Knicks immediately went from a play in team to winning at a 80% rate by simply replacing him with OG in the starting line up.
It turns out that it’s probably a wise idea to upgrade on a guy that’s on both these lists and is a weak defender too.
Masai will trade him as soon as he can find a team that wants him.
Duffman100 wrote:M3tro wrote:A few mocks have us going with Essengue now
Essengue vs Bryant, what's the main difference other than Bryant can shoot.
I feel if both are at that pick you go Bryant.
PhilBlackson wrote:Duffman100 wrote:M3tro wrote:A few mocks have us going with Essengue now
Essengue vs Bryant, what's the main difference other than Bryant can shoot.
I feel if both are at that pick you go Bryant.
Bryant is also a much better defender. I know it sounds cliche but honestly ask Arizona fans, he really does make winning plays. I’m not sure if he’ll be a star but I’m confident he will/would make this team better.
Gavin_TDThree wrote:Can someone talk me into Cedric Coward. I've see the highlights, the shooting touch, the stats, but I'm not sold. He wasn't playing that strong of competition and he's an older prospect. For the Cowards heads out there, if the raps were to grab him at 9th what am I getting?
ATLTimekeeper wrote:RJ is turning 26 this year, Cam is turning 30 and has bad knees. There's no way Masai is moving DOWN to pick up a worse, older player. I think Masai has a lot to prove to earn back the trust of the fanbase, but he's not capable of making a trade this bad.
Mark_83 wrote:Still fully on board the Carter Bryant train. Just hoping no one jumps the gun and takes him ahead of us. Hoping for another first rounder to take Jase Richardson. But assuming we stand pat I'll go Kalkbrenner in the 2nd round, and sign Mark Sears and Jalon Moore to camp deals.
HumbleRen wrote:bobbyp3588 wrote:HumbleRen wrote:
That’s only because RJ would be on a rookie deal lol.
RJ is just not a winning player. I get that he’s Canadian and all that stuff but this is the same trap a lot of Demar fans fell for.
He will always be a guy that every single team wants to upgrade on when they go from a middling team to a team that’s serious about winning.
Knicks won’t be first team, we won’t be the last team, this will be his legacy for every team that he lands on.
There’s not a single playoff team that would take RJ over Johnson.
I don’t believe that for a second. And who are you for me to believe. Opinions are like ****. We all have one. Why should we care about yours?
We literally just tried to trade him at the trade deadline and a team like the poverty Pelicans said nah I’m good on RJ.
Knicks immediately went from a play in team to winning at a 80% rate by simply replacing him with OG in the starting line up.
It turns out that it’s probably a wise idea to upgrade on a guy that’s on both these lists and is a weak defender too.
Masai will trade him as soon as he can find a team that wants him.