REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:Ren you're more cooked without DelAbbot than Lively is without Luka. Lively will be fine.
He’s as cooked as you are.
You don’t draft lob catchers with a top 7 pick.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:Ren you're more cooked without DelAbbot than Lively is without Luka. Lively will be fine.
Jcity08 wrote:Crazy how much of a debate there is around Maluach, the dude is pretty raw from everything we've seen unless you only look at highlight reels.
I'm only speaking for myself when I say this but I'd rather not use one of the only lottery draft picks we'll get in a while on someone as offensively limited and charmin soft for a 7+ footer.
I'd rather another team take the risk than us at the 7/8/9 pick.
Indeed wrote:To be fair, Embiid was 20, while Maluach is 18.
However, those skills where you got good footwork with counters (bags) may not be a year of development. And his block rate isn't even good, meaning his focus may just be on defense.
Personally, I don't think he will be a bust, but I am not very high on him. Perhaps just a starting C.
Indeed wrote:Psubs wrote:
He's my #3 PG prospect after Harper and Fears. Fears might just be a combo guard though.
Fears with around 28% passing rate is definitely near the top in passing as a PG, his vision is also being praised by multiple scouting reports I read.
As for De Larrea, if his quickness with the ball is good, he could be Herro lite.
ciueli wrote:Indeed wrote:To be fair, Embiid was 20, while Maluach is 18.
However, those skills where you got good footwork with counters (bags) may not be a year of development. And his block rate isn't even good, meaning his focus may just be on defense.
Personally, I don't think he will be a bust, but I am not very high on him. Perhaps just a starting C.
His block rate is low because Duke aggressively switched him onto perimeter players, it's very hard to get good rebound and block numbers when you are a switch defender as you are pulled away from the basket on defence. They also did nothing to develop or take advantage of his perimeter game, this is why I really dislike college as a developmental path for young players, the coach and organization is 100% focused on winning a title each year and players are not developed they way they are in the NBA, they're just told to do the narrow thing they do well or the team needs them to do to maximize the chance of winning as everyone knows they are gone after 1 year.
TrustFundBaby wrote:
Think this is what's happening on the board right now, many guys are overthinking this.
7'2 with a 7'8 wingspan, fluid on the perimeter and pretty decent on switches for being 7'2. only 18, has around 5 years of basketball experience. Soft hands, hyper-efficient with 74% TS. Willing to go out to the 3 and take shots there, but even if that doesn't develop he would at minimum be a dominant lob threat.
Khaman-Scottie-Ingram as an FC is massively long, it would give opposing offences fits driving into that. Not to mention, you have to look at where the league is going. Wembenyama, Jokic, Giannis, and after them are guys like AD, JJJ, Mobley, Gobert, Chet. Many are huge C's that can protect the paint and most of them can step out to the 3.
This guy is super raw, I take this bet every day, and I bet Masai does too. BAL's best product is coming home to TOR. I would go as far as saying I'd take him at #2.
Tha Cynic wrote:Based on Masai’s exit interview, his biggest disappointment this year was the Chomche injury and he made a point to mention that he thinks Chomche is the dark horse in the players they drafted.
I don’t think it’s so clear cut that they’ll draft Maluach. The issue is that a lot of players in our range either have poor athleticism, size or don’t project as great defenders.
This isn’t going to be easy. A lot of players have good skills but will they actually be elite or even great winning players. They’re going to have to weight raw potential and size against established skills on offence with poor defense and lack of size/athleticsm.
They’re other thing is, there seem to be few very intriguing role players in the 10-15 range. Man, if they can just find a way to get someone to take RJ for one of those picks.
TrustFundBaby wrote:Tha Cynic wrote:Based on Masai’s exit interview, his biggest disappointment this year was the Chomche injury and he made a point to mention that he thinks Chomche is the dark horse in the players they drafted.
I don’t think it’s so clear cut that they’ll draft Maluach. The issue is that a lot of players in our range either have poor athleticism, size or don’t project as great defenders.
This isn’t going to be easy. A lot of players have good skills but will they actually be elite or even great winning players. They’re going to have to weight raw potential and size against established skills on offence with poor defense and lack of size/athleticsm.
They’re other thing is, there seem to be few very intriguing role players in the 10-15 range. Man, if they can just find a way to get someone to take RJ for one of those picks.
I like Chomche and Mogbo, especially from where we picked them at. But I think realistically, we're happy if Chomche is just a rotation big and Mogbo is a solid backup PF/C.
Khaman is just another level than these guys, I doubt MU thinks of them when considering this pick.
REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:Ren you're more cooked without DelAbbot than Lively is without Luka. Lively will be fine.
Please don't bait.
deeps6x wrote:I guarantee you that (Jaylen) Brown and (Kris) Dunn are drafted OUT of the top 5.
Los_29 wrote:REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:Ren you're more cooked without DelAbbot than Lively is without Luka. Lively will be fine.
Please don't bait.
Do you still believe Lively can be a top 24 player in this league?
I frankly don’t see it.
TrustFundBaby wrote:
Think this is what's happening on the board right now, many guys are overthinking this.
7'2 with a 7'8 wingspan, fluid on the perimeter and pretty decent on switches for being 7'2. only 18, has around 5 years of basketball experience. Soft hands, hyper-efficient with 74% TS. Willing to go out to the 3 and take shots there, but even if that doesn't develop he would at minimum be a dominant lob threat.
Khaman-Scottie-Ingram as an FC is massively long, it would give opposing offences fits driving into that. Not to mention, you have to look at where the league is going. Wembenyama, Jokic, Giannis, and after them are guys like AD, JJJ, Mobley, Gobert, Chet. Many are huge C's that can protect the paint and most of them can step out to the 3.
This guy is super raw, I take this bet every day, and I bet Masai does too. BAL's best product is coming home to TOR. I would go as far as saying I'd take him at #2.
TrustFundBaby wrote:
Think this is what's happening on the board right now, many guys are overthinking this.
7'2 with a 7'8 wingspan, fluid on the perimeter and pretty decent on switches for being 7'2. only 18, has around 5 years of basketball experience. Soft hands, hyper-efficient with 74% TS. Willing to go out to the 3 and take shots there, but even if that doesn't develop he would at minimum be a dominant lob threat.
Khaman-Scottie-Ingram as an FC is massively long, it would give opposing offences fits driving into that. Not to mention, you have to look at where the league is going. Wembenyama, Jokic, Giannis, and after them are guys like AD, JJJ, Mobley, Gobert, Chet. Many are huge C's that can protect the paint and most of them can step out to the 3.
This guy is super raw, I take this bet every day, and I bet Masai does too. BAL's best product is coming home to TOR. I would go as far as saying I'd take him at #2.
Clutch0z24 wrote: i don't like how people try and convince people that Maluach is more than just a P&R Lob threat on offense....Because im pretty sure thats all he will be....He can't pass, Can't Dribble, Can't really shoot (I watched tape of him and his jumpshots brick badly or air ball alot) Can't really make a post up move or beat a defender with a go to move...
Clutch0z24 wrote:Yes he can develop but the chances of him being the player everyone thinks he can become one day are prolly 30 percent.....He prolly would need a Luka/CP3 level PG to play with to really maximize him....We do not have that kind of a player to really showcase Maluach if we draft him so it might look ugly for a few years till we find a guy to pair with him.
Problem for me with Maluach is he is the type of player you add to a team if you already have a Luka Doncic type player you are building around....Some people will say thats Barnes....Which i disagree....I think Queen will be the better player than Maluach at the end of the day....But we shall see.
Clutch0z24 wrote:Los_29 wrote:REJECTEDBYCLARK wrote:Ren you're more cooked without DelAbbot than Lively is without Luka. Lively will be fine.
Please don't bait.
Do you still believe Lively can be a top 24 player in this league?
I frankly don’t see it.
Lively will never be top 25 because he will always rely on another player to get him baskets....This is the exact reason i am a little hesitant to draft Maluach....Will Maluach be better than Lively? Prolly not or they are prolly the same level of player....Which doesn't really excite me if we do not have a Luka level play maker.
Tha Cynic wrote:Based on Masai’s exit interview, his biggest disappointment this year was the Chomche injury and he made a point to mention that he thinks Chomche is the dark horse in the players they drafted.
I don’t think it’s so clear cut that they’ll draft Maluach. The issue is that a lot of players in our range either have poor athleticism, size or don’t project as great defenders.
This isn’t going to be easy. A lot of players have good skills but will they actually be elite or even great winning players. They’re going to have to weight raw potential and size against established skills on offence with poor defense and lack of size/athleticsm.
They’re other thing is, there seem to be few very intriguing role players in the 10-15 range. Man, if they can just find a way to get someone to take RJ for one of those picks.