pingpongrac wrote:The blowout loss that Giannis was injured midway through was a game that Trae also missed. It is relevant, but one blowout game where the Bucks' offence was garbage without Giannis doesn't change the fact that the Bucks handled the Hawks perfectly fine. However way you try to slice it, Milwaukee won in 6 games and had a +7.2 NetRTG despite missing Giannis for 2.5 games.720 wrote:pingpongrac wrote:I wouldn't consider outscoring the Hawks by 7 PPG over the series to be a struggle. They needed 6 games, but they lost G1 by 3 points and had one blowout loss when Giannis left early with an injury. Also, last year's Phoenix team was better and beat better competition (Lakers, Nuggets and Clippers) than the bubble ball Heat.
When did Miami show Milwaukee is easily beatable? Tonight when the Bucks were without almost half of their rotation or in the bubble when Milwaukee was already clearly struggling and had a very different roster?
Sent from my Pixel 4 using RealGM mobile app
Funny you bring up no Giannis but don’t bring up how Atlanta didn’t have Trae for game 5 and a hobbled Trae Young in game 6. The Hawks are worse without Young more than the Bucks without Giannis because the bucks still had all star Middleton.
The Bucks struggled vs a 5th seed team, a team that probably beats them if Young didn’t get hurt in game 4. Bucks got very lucky with all the injuries. FIVE superstars were injured this past playoffs, in addition multiple allstars as well.
Milwaukee was fortunate that the Nets were without Kyrie for the last 3 games and Harden for 3 games in the middle, but they deserve full credit for their Championship. I don't know why so many people in this thread think a playoff series in a bubble after a 5-month hiatus a year ago when Milwaukee had a very different roster or a regular season game with half of their rotation out is more valid than what happened 4-5 months ago in more normal conditions.
Sent from my Pixel 4 using RealGM mobile app
Nothing changes the fact that the Bucks struggled with a 5th seed in the ecfs and needed that 5th seeds best player to go down with an injury to gain back control of the series. As well as it took game 7 OT to put away a Nets team with just KD and a bunch of old guys plus a hobbled Harden who couldn’t provide much of anything.
Both top contenders out west went down early with their respective injuries so they never even had to face them in the finals.
They get full credit for taking advantage of the record amount of injuries and eeking out a championship. Not all championships are equal though (for me personally, not saying for everyone). The longer I follow the nba the more I realize that.