MEDIC wrote:Really didn't like watching this:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0F2ZGqXYnbc&list=UUtA1fanU-infOsCodhDiroA&index=290&feature=plpp_video[/youtube]
Still an interesting prospect, but that defense.....if you wanna call it that.....was terrible.
Really lacked any kind of defensive intensity & intelligence in that video.
Makes me sour on him a bit...
All those clips are from his freshman season, not this year. He's very coachable and has the physical tools, under Casey he will be fine defensively. Most 19 year olds (especially those who are regarded highly for their scoring skills) are bad defenders regardless, especially in their first few seasons in the NBA. He does make a lot of nice defensive plays too, he plays like someone who wants to get better, but I agree he does have a tendency to get lost on both ends. It's weird because IMO it's not an intelligence issue because his bball IQ is very good, it's not an effort/commitment issue because he is known to work really hard (and his skills/improvement show this)...I'd say more of an "engagement" issue, or inconsistent intensity/aggressiveness, from possession to possession (on both ends).
I wouldn't brand him a low motor player though because he puts in some serious work in the gym, he already added what looked like around 10 lbs last year, showed off his improved handles (said he worked everyday in the summer on them) and pull up game, and at times he works so hard/well off the ball in ways "low motor" guys just don't....but then he will have a 5 minute stretch of doing nothing, completely passive. Low motor guys don't have his hunger to get better, this is a guy who wasn't recruited highly in high school and in a couple of years has worked his way into becoming a top 10 pick. I don't question his motivation, effort or work ethic at all, only his confidence and killer instinct on the court. He needs to play like he's the f-ing man, when you watch him iso up on guys he can get anything on them that he wants, break them down or get a shot, but after doing that he'll just go 5 possessions without making any sort of an attacking move. Though it should be noted that college offenses are a lot different than NBA ones, star players don't just demand the ball and go one on one, most college stars are a part of the offense not THE offense. So when I say he goes 5 minutes without doing anything, it's not always him standing around and being passive, sometimes they just aren't running plays for him, sometimes his point guards dominate the ball too much and start chucking.
Also, I think someone made the point of him looking really bad against Syracuse. He looked bad ANYTIME the opposing team played zone. A lot of that has to do with that UConn simply didn't have a good offensive approach to attacking the zone this year, there was a lot of dead ball movement (ie. passes without any purpose) and the ball would rarely make it down below the FT line. The team looked completely unprepared against the zone, basically would result in the guards taking a long jumper. Probably has to do with the fact that Calhoun couldn't be with the team for long stretches due to suspension and then health problems. I'm also somewhat comforted with Lamb's poor performance against zone defense by the fact that NBA teams break down the zone much more easily (better and more open spacing, multiple guys on teams usually who can attack it off the dribble) and a guy who has a nice stroke like Lamb won't have any problem against it in the NBA, in fact it plays to his strengths.
Lamb's weaknesses to me aren't the glaring types you get from guys who fail to deliver at the NBA level. Biggest reasons guys, especially perimeter players, disappoint at the NBA level?
Lack of skills - except he's not a raw prospect you are drooling over because "once he learns to shoot" or "once he learns to put the ball on the floor"...the skills are already there and they are better than anyone else at his position in this draft.
Inability to create own shot - he can do this all day, has NBA caliber moves to create space.
Physical tools - you see this with guys who are stars at the college level but can't cut it in the NBA because they are not athletic enough or undersized or lack a true position. Except Lamb has a great combo of athleticism and length (length somewhat compares to that of KD at SF) suited to the NBA game.
Work ethic - everything from what I've heard and more importantly, what he's shown in his progress year to year, leads me to believe this is not something to be concerned about.
Low ceiling/potential - I don't think this is something anyone will argue. He's got a lot of room to improve. He hasn't even filled out his body, still learning to mix up his offensive skills, has barely scratched the surface of his potential as a defender/rebounder, is improving his skills every year and still "finding himself" as a player.
All in all we have a guy who is the most skilled at his position, has the best combo of length/athleticism at his position, has the highest ceiling at his position and on top of that works hard? Yea, we should totally not draft this guy. He's being penalized for being so skilled and talented that he "didn't do more", while still putting up better numbers than the other wings (btw, I'd love to see the other guys play with a backcourt of Napier and Boatright and try getting enough touches game to game to put up 18 ppg, nevermind doing it as efficiently as Lamb did). Also UConn's disappointing year as a team also seems to have made people forget that Lamb was on the championship team in his freshman year and put up
16.1 ppg on 58 FG%/70 TS% in the tournament. Just keep that in mind when people create this (non-existent) gap between guys like Beal/MKG/Barnes and Lamb because those other guys had more team success this year.
Trust me, I'm more aware of his flaws than his most vocal haters on here and it's crazy how people are overlooking the weaknesses of all the other prospects (more major/fundamental imo), and I partly blame people drawing their opinions from mock drafts (they see him 11th or 12th on some and assume his weaknesses must be more glaring than everyone else). And also, not sure if serious at people doing a PER, TS% etc etc comparison of Lamb with DeMar in college like it means ANYTHING when evaluating how well a college prospect's game translates to the NBA. Anyways I've kind of stopped caring about who we draft now, we're not in a position to choose anymore, we're hoping to pick up the scraps after the other 7 teams have picked...fukking sucks.