Raptaurus wrote:SocialistHipHop wrote:VanWest82 wrote:Whether the FO wants to rebuild or not is irrelevant if ownership won't back it. Something tells me they won't.
That pretty much sums it up. The Poetl trade happened to appease ownership with a playoff appearance. I can’t see MLSE walking way from playoff revenue, unless they actually believe that this team has no chance to make the playoffs, which may be the case after the play-in implosion, but doubtful since MLSE seem delusional.
I think that their goal is Round One playoff revenue. But your point is still valid that it’s not that difficult to turn this current team into consistent first round fodder.
The problem is that it’s not very difficult to put together a team to compete for a play-in spot. Every team in the NBA has at least some level of talent. You really just need for them to show up and play with some effort (and not purposefully try to tank). That’s all that MLSE may desire though - maintaining the illusion of fielding a “competitive” team to fill the seats day in and day out over the entire season. Extra revenue from one or two play-in games is like the cherry on top.
Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
- SocialistHipHop
- Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1,491
- And1: 1,825
- Joined: Apr 12, 2014
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
islandboy53
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,709
- And1: 862
- Joined: May 09, 2016
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
Kordic27 wrote:John Murdoch wrote:DLO + Beasly+ #17 for FVV + GTJ
DLO's contract is a negative, and he hasn't even signed one yet!
And Beasley is at best a lateral move from Trent Jr. There would need to be more coming this way to move VV for DLo, and I'm nt sure Lakers have enough to make it work.
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
islandboy53
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,709
- And1: 862
- Joined: May 09, 2016
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
OakleyDokely wrote:JKiddy wrote:Hypo:
If the Nets secured LaVine and he was the 3rd/4th option behind Bridges, LaVine, CamJo, and would be tied for the 4th option with Claxton do you think that can work as a contender in the East?
Lineup would be:
VV
LaVine
Bridges
CamJo
Claxton
Possible Bench:
Royce O'Neale
Cam Thomas
Yuta Watanabe
1st Round pick BK keeps this season
D. Sharpe
FA Stretch 4/Rebounder
I think VV is a quality starter on a really good team. He just can't be one of your top scorers and on that team, he wouldn't be, so I think that lineup would be a good fit for him.
Sounds like an interesting move. What would be coming back?
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
Kordic27
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,305
- And1: 3,347
- Joined: Dec 10, 2005
- Location: TO
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
John Murdoch wrote:Kordic27 wrote:John Murdoch wrote:DLO + Beasly+ #17 for FVV + GTJ
DLO's contract is a negative, and he hasn't even signed one yet!
Meh , he was solid in that GSW series..matchups make fights
He's one of those rare guys who I'd literally prefer to not have on my team. Like, minimum salary, no thanks.
Trusted Ujiri Watcher
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
JKiddy
- Starter
- Posts: 2,247
- And1: 497
- Joined: Jul 28, 2002
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
islandboy53 wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:JKiddy wrote:Hypo:
If the Nets secured LaVine and he was the 3rd/4th option behind Bridges, LaVine, CamJo, and would be tied for the 4th option with Claxton do you think that can work as a contender in the East?
Lineup would be:
VV
LaVine
Bridges
CamJo
Claxton
Possible Bench:
Royce O'Neale
Cam Thomas
Yuta Watanabe
1st Round pick BK keeps this season
D. Sharpe
FA Stretch 4/Rebounder
I think VV is a quality starter on a really good team. He just can't be one of your top scorers and on that team, he wouldn't be, so I think that lineup would be a good fit for him.
Sounds like an interesting move. What would be coming back?
VV is an UFA correct?
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
- PhilBlackson
- RealGM
- Posts: 31,894
- And1: 46,627
- Joined: May 02, 2017
- Location: No Wastemans Land
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
John Murdoch wrote:DLO + Beasly+ #17 for FVV + GTJ
Absolutely no interest in DLO whatsoever.
You can pick which guard but it would be for Beasley + 17, DLo can go dance at the end of the bench somewhere else. I’d try to leverage whichever remaining guard in another S&T package before I’d pay DLo for no reason.
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<<
*INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON* Wemby is HIM

Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley

Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
mtcan
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,872
- And1: 24,296
- Joined: May 19, 2001
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
JKiddy wrote:islandboy53 wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:
I think VV is a quality starter on a really good team. He just can't be one of your top scorers and on that team, he wouldn't be, so I think that lineup would be a good fit for him.
Sounds like an interesting move. What would be coming back?
VV is an UFA correct?
You think Fred is signing for the minimum?
Dude is looking to get PAID...and last I checked the Nets are capped out.
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
- InfraRedshaw
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 852
- And1: 818
- Joined: Nov 23, 2012
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
JKiddy wrote:islandboy53 wrote:OakleyDokely wrote:
I think VV is a quality starter on a really good team. He just can't be one of your top scorers and on that team, he wouldn't be, so I think that lineup would be a good fit for him.
Sounds like an interesting move. What would be coming back?
VV is an UFA correct?
No, not right now, he has 1 year left as a player option, he has yet to opt out or opt in, so right now he is still a Raptor until he decides he's not
Just 8* years ago Andrea Bargnani was my franchise player, you MF'ers can't rain on my parade
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
JKiddy
- Starter
- Posts: 2,247
- And1: 497
- Joined: Jul 28, 2002
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
If you read in between the lines the Nets would have removed the contracts of several players making about 65M will bringing 40M back from LaVine. They also have some TEs worth about 25M combined I believe.
This is all hypothetical. After getting some intel from this board, if FVV is not healthy I would not be too keen on bringing him aboard.
If he was pretty healthy I have no idea what his market would be. But, you are correct, he might just opt in for one more year of solid earnings.
This is all hypothetical. After getting some intel from this board, if FVV is not healthy I would not be too keen on bringing him aboard.
If he was pretty healthy I have no idea what his market would be. But, you are correct, he might just opt in for one more year of solid earnings.
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
Raptors Realtor
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,613
- And1: 3,545
- Joined: Jul 16, 2009
- Location: Toronto, ON
- Contact:
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
JKiddy wrote:If you read in between the lines the Nets would have removed the contracts of several players making about 65M will bringing 40M back from LaVine. They also have some TEs worth about 25M combined I believe.
This is all hypothetical. After getting some intel from this board, if FVV is not healthy I would not be too keen on bringing him aboard.
If he was pretty healthy I have no idea what his market would be. But, you are correct, he might just opt in for one more year of solid earnings.
He'll opt out, and will be looking for a multi year contract in the $30M/per range.
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
srhcan
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,125
- And1: 2,073
- Joined: Mar 25, 2021
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
They are not going to do a full rebuild. Masai realizes the limitations of Toronto; a full rebuild can seriously hurt the bottom line. Plus Toronto do not have FRP next year.
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
- ItsDanger
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,773
- And1: 25,963
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
A full rebuild would imply acquiring additional draft picks for THIS draft. If they don't workout prospects in relative ranges of hypothetical picks, then rebuild chances decrease dramatically. Some of the workout news will leak out from agents, players, etc. So far, I would say its not looking good at all on the rebuild front unfortunately.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
mtcan
- RealGM
- Posts: 27,872
- And1: 24,296
- Joined: May 19, 2001
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
JKiddy wrote:If you read in between the lines the Nets would have removed the contracts of several players making about 65M will bringing 40M back from LaVine. They also have some TEs worth about 25M combined I believe.
This is all hypothetical. After getting some intel from this board, if FVV is not healthy I would not be too keen on bringing him aboard.
If he was pretty healthy I have no idea what his market would be. But, you are correct, he might just opt in for one more year of solid earnings.
Thr injuries are probably due to Fred being among league leaders in minutes played.
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
dagger
- RealGM
- Posts: 41,369
- And1: 14,414
- Joined: Aug 19, 2002
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
Raptors Realtor wrote:It's not complicated... You let GMs know you're listening and you let the caliber of the offers decide for you.
I think that's the best way to sum things up. If you commit publicly to a fire sale, you get bad offers for your talent, or get stuck with bad contracts and picks for your best assets, which means it will take a year or two longer just to hit bottom. If you were the GM who wants a significant rebuild, you want a clean sheet as soon as possible so you can rent out cap pace for extra picks. Taking on bad money to move a good player might mean you don't get bad enough fast enough and end up with the 8th or 9th worst record for multiple years.
Instead, you try to induce the market to bid up your best players.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
ArthurVandelay
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,563
- And1: 6,302
- Joined: Feb 10, 2023
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
mtcan wrote:JKiddy wrote:If you read in between the lines the Nets would have removed the contracts of several players making about 65M will bringing 40M back from LaVine. They also have some TEs worth about 25M combined I believe.
This is all hypothetical. After getting some intel from this board, if FVV is not healthy I would not be too keen on bringing him aboard.
If he was pretty healthy I have no idea what his market would be. But, you are correct, he might just opt in for one more year of solid earnings.
Thr injuries are probably due to Fred being among league leaders in minutes played.
And putting on a lot of weight over the last 4 years.
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
islandboy53
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,709
- And1: 862
- Joined: May 09, 2016
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
InfraRedshaw wrote:JKiddy wrote:islandboy53 wrote:
Sounds like an interesting move. What would be coming back?
VV is an UFA correct?
No, not right now, he has 1 year left as a player option, he has yet to opt out or opt in, so right now he is still a Raptor until he decides he's not
It's virtually certain that VanVleet opts out (there's a very small chance he opts in and extends with the Raptors). However, while he could sign elsewhere as a UFA, you should expect the starting salary will be $28mil, give or take. While he could sign with one of the handful of teams with cap space, it seems most likely that he'll either be back with the Raptors or moved in a sign and trade. Hence, my query as to what you propose to send back (you'd be needing roughly $23mil in salary).
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
islandboy53
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,709
- And1: 862
- Joined: May 09, 2016
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
ItsDanger wrote:A full rebuild would imply acquiring additional draft picks for THIS draft. If they don't workout prospects in relative ranges of hypothetical picks, then rebuild chances decrease dramatically. Some of the workout news will leak out from agents, players, etc. So far, I would say its not looking good at all on the rebuild front unfortunately.
Glad to hear it!!
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
- ItsDanger
- RealGM
- Posts: 28,773
- And1: 25,963
- Joined: Nov 01, 2008
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
If you took the opportunity to rebuild, you can take back bad contracts in a sign and trade as a cost. Keeping status quo means you're quite limited.
Organization can be defined as an organized body of people with a particular purpose. Not random.
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
-
JKiddy
- Starter
- Posts: 2,247
- And1: 497
- Joined: Jul 28, 2002
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
islandboy53 wrote:InfraRedshaw wrote:JKiddy wrote:
VV is an UFA correct?
No, not right now, he has 1 year left as a player option, he has yet to opt out or opt in, so right now he is still a Raptor until he decides he's not
It's virtually certain that VanVleet opts out (there's a very small chance he opts in and extends with the Raptors). However, while he could sign elsewhere as a UFA, you should expect the starting salary will be $28mil, give or take. While he could sign with one of the handful of teams with cap space, it seems most likely that he'll either be back with the Raptors or moved in a sign and trade. Hence, my query as to what you propose to send back (you'd be needing roughly $23mil in salary).
I do not think the Nets will have interest in FVV unless he was a total UFA. If not, I think he stays put or is S&T'd elsewhere. I guess there is a chance the Nets do a S&T but it won't be something insane.
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
- InfraRedshaw
- Pro Prospect
- Posts: 852
- And1: 818
- Joined: Nov 23, 2012
-
Re: Kevin O'Connor: "There's people in that front office that want full rebuild"
islandboy53 wrote:InfraRedshaw wrote:JKiddy wrote:
VV is an UFA correct?
No, not right now, he has 1 year left as a player option, he has yet to opt out or opt in, so right now he is still a Raptor until he decides he's not
It's virtually certain that VanVleet opts out (there's a very small chance he opts in and extends with the Raptors). However, while he could sign elsewhere as a UFA, you should expect the starting salary will be $28mil, give or take. While he could sign with one of the handful of teams with cap space, it seems most likely that he'll either be back with the Raptors or moved in a sign and trade. Hence, my query as to what you propose to send back (you'd be needing roughly $23mil in salary).
Yeah I know, and agree that he is very likely to opt out, I was just answering* the question about his current status
Just 8* years ago Andrea Bargnani was my franchise player, you MF'ers can't rain on my parade









