tsherkin wrote:Scase wrote:I'm not sure what is getting lost in translation here, I've been pretty clear that I expect the team to be better than last year, full stop. Same way I expected the Pistons to be better than their prior year, but them adding Harris isn't exactly something to look forward to down the line as a viable way to improve the team long term, same with BI.
And again, people need to stop with the hyperbole. I never said I expect 30 -> chip, that is literally the nonsense I was saying needs to stop.
I know you didn't say that. I was pointing out that we are in a transition phase. Bitching about our future prospects while we are in that space doesn't make a lot of sense.
I don't see how this iteration of the roster has the growth potential to eventually become a contender.
And that's precisely why I made the remark I did. No one saw the path forward with the Demar/Lowry team, either. It will either present itself, or it will not. In the meantime, we should be enjoying a return to winning basketball, and not overly concerning ourselves with contender status at this point in the team's journey. We just had a 30-win season; all talk about pathways to contention are ridiculous at this point. All analyses and considerations about whether or not we can, or how we would get there are premature and mostly inappropriate.
So I am basing my opinion on the current roster and my evaluation of their room for growth, that's all. No one is expecting the Spurs to go from 34 wins to a chip, but you can bet your ass they have a lot of expectations and justifiable hope for the long term future due to Wemby. We don't have any player on the roster to offer up even half the level of optimism he provides, hence the "Yeah, we'll be better, but to what end?" vibe that I have with this team.
Right, but this is a problematic attitude which produces nothing but negativity. Yes, we don't have a generational talent on our roster. Okay. Loads of teams don't. Until they do. Or until they find other paths to talent acquisition and get themselves to a strong level of competitive play.
There's SOME degree to which we need to start pushing away from purely negative responses and try to find some of the positives here, or all we will be doing is contributing to a toxic environment. We can't JUST be a pool of unlimited negativity, or what's the point? No one wants to come here and just be like "ugh, yeah, the Raptors are **** and aren't going anywhere. Me MIGHT win 43 games, and that'll suck."
People want to have conversations, not just rehashes of old battle lines, right? And sometimes we need to work on ourselves to find something more than just pessimism and dismay.
So what exactly is the purpose of a discussion, if all we do is ignore the negatives and only try and seek positives? No one is saying this is the worst team in history or anything so outlandish, simply stating that the team is mid. Realism =/= negativity. I am still hopeful for Gradey to continue to grow, and maybe that we can see Scottie shine on defence, but again there is nothing overwhelmingly hopeful to be positive about, it's just kinda meh.
So the two options we have at our disposal here is, say anything negative and it turns into some out of control cesspool, or toxic positivity where you have to dig to the core of the earth to find something? Not sure I subscribe to either of those. There are people here with unbridled optimism, bless their hearts, and there are people who are not enthused by the team currently.
If there are noticeably more of one side vs the other, that says something about the team, and not the fanbase. So if we want to have honest discussions you have to live with both sides, if you want to have an echo chamber, we better start getting the perma ban hammer out for all those who don't think things are sunshine and rainbows.
I just don't understand the push for trying to dictate what people think and are allowed to discuss if it's related to the team. I wouldn't want people faking some attempt at positivity any more than I would for someone to nitpik on something like BI "only" played 75 games next season.