Ell Curry wrote:dozo wrote:Ell Curry wrote:
If Scoot is let's say John Wall and going behind Miller, then I think Siakam and #13 for let's say Hayward and #3 is probably worth it in the long run. Save like 25-30M a year, balance out the rotation, try to win when Barnes is hopefully ready in 2-3 years after getting a bump from getting to play the 4 (which should help him, as it does virtually all 3s now that traditional Davis brother type 4s are largely obsolete).
Poeltl-Koloko
Barnes-Achiuwa
OG-Hayward/Porter
Trent-Scoot/MLE
VanVleet-Scoot
and either Hayward expires and our cap situation is clean, or we move Hayward for a backup wing, either with a pick (for a good 6th man type) or some meh guys on smaller deals from a team wanting cap space, like Brooklyn with their extra wings. Ideally you sign like Josh Richardson or Strus with the MLE but probably actually get like Lonnie Walker or Nunn or someone like that. We should have signed Malik Monk, that was annoying to miss on him twice, same as Hartenstein.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/syndication.bleacherreport.com/amp/1239079-10-craziest-draft-day-trades-of-all-time.amp.html
Draft day trades are usually one-sided e.g. Antonio Davis for Johnthan Bender. I would be reluctant to make the above trade due to history of draft day trades.
Totally fair. It's a high-risk move, but unless Masai really likes a shot creating guard and one falls to us (Smith or George seem the likeliest) then I'm not sure how we address that spot, and we're obviously in a weird spot where we aren't a contender but can't tank.
I guess I could see us moving the pick for a future 1st and something else and looking to move Boucher and that pick into a guard down the line?
The trade proposal is good a couple tweaks and I can see both teams accepting the trade. I agree no risk no reward. History has shown that Ujiri is reluctant (Giannis, Shai) to make draft day trades. Its clear as day that the guard depth/play is holding this team back. C.Wallace would be a great addition.