Brinbe wrote:RoteSchroder wrote:Brinbe wrote:he's a way better defender than all those guys. and trying to call him a tunnel vision player just shows you have no zero clue here lol
c'mon man...
the tape, the production and the results don't lie on him. and a combine score or a body type doesn't change that he's a winning player.
You probably don’t even know what that stat indicates. Pfeifer manually tracked each prospects passes and subjectively labeled any pass that requires a high degree of skill as a “big time pass”
So if Queen passes 10 times in a game, 3.7 out of 10 passes are where he’s trying to do something fancy. If you actually want to disprove my point, track where he’s looking to score, but is in a situation where he needs to pass, then compare the pass/shoot ratio to other prospects.
With your level of analysis, gotta take whatever you say with a grain of salt.
of course, I know what it is. you don't even need the stats. you just need eyes and a working brain instead of trying to play a contrarian.
since you're great with stats, tell me how many games has derik queen lost in the past two years at montverde and maryland combined? how many has he won? what's his winning percentage? answer that for me. i'll even help you out a bit.


'doing something fancy' when his teams consistently win. but sure, he's just gettin 'carried' right? taking my opinions with a grain of salt when you're just a nonsense hater. let me guess, he's too fat and dumb?
Listen dude, I get he’s a poor man’s version of Sabonis. He can be a great 6th man, I just don’t want a fat tunnel vision version of Sabonis, I want a rich man’s Sabonis, to which we both can agree he’s not.
Using highlight packages and the misuse of stats isn’t something I’m interested in.
Lol @quoting a team with Flagg, McNeeley, Newell also on the roster. With this level of analysis, gotta take your word with a grain of salt.