Pointgod wrote:Clutch0z24 wrote:Pointgod wrote:
This is why John Hollinger is an idiot
Whoever pays for his takes is a fool.....The Dude really is way off and throws **** at the wall and hope it sticks
John Hollinger is what happens when you’ve built a one dimensional career and religiously stick to that dimension just because it’s what your brand is built on, even if you’re hilariously wrong and look like an idiot. I know that’s not a mock draft but even as a big board it’s pretty ****.
From Hollinger's interview with Koreen today:
Koreen: Assuming Cunningham, Mobley and Green are the first three picks in some order, which seems likely, would you pick the very Raptors-y Barnes or Sengun over Suggs?
Hollinger: If anything, I’m questioning why I didn’t put Barnes higher. If I was Toronto I would definitely go after Barnes, because I think he has the best chance of becoming a big star and, even if he doesn’t, he fits really well into a lot of the stuff Nick Nurse tries to do defensively with pressuring the ball and forcing turnovers.
I really like Sengun too, but it’s trickier with 5s because it’s so hard to play multiple bigs together. Toronto obviously could use some help at center, but the Raps would need a pretty high degree of belief in Sengun to roll with him here. (Also, realistically, if Sengun is their guy, they probably should trade down first and get more assets).
I mean, Hollinger's not an "idiot". But his PER stat overvalues certain counting stats. It's still a useful way to compare players. Top PER players are top players, period.