tanuki1031 wrote:According to the ringer we've had the 4th easiest schedule so far and have the 2nd hardest remaining.
Booyeah!
They haven't played any games vs Detroit, Minnesota or Washington yet.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
tanuki1031 wrote:According to the ringer we've had the 4th easiest schedule so far and have the 2nd hardest remaining.
Booyeah!

Psubs wrote:tanuki1031 wrote:According to the ringer we've had the 4th easiest schedule so far and have the 2nd hardest remaining.
Booyeah!
They haven't played any games vs Detroit, Minnesota or Washington yet.

Mark_83 wrote:If we fell outside of the top 5 who's the next best guy up? Barnes? Moody? Bouknight?

PhilBlackson wrote:Mark_83 wrote:If we fell outside of the top 5 who's the next best guy up? Barnes? Moody? Bouknight?
Imo right now it looks like any of Williams, Johnson, Barnes, Christopher or Boston could end up being steals and my next best 5 personally...

KL78192020 wrote:bluerap23 wrote:ReggieSlater wrote:I'll clarify my position one more time, and leave it at that.
I'm not against trading Lowry if the team decides to do that. My only argument is that incremental success is possible, and any teams current ceiling isn't static. I'd personally rather not get into the rut of star chasing like the Knicks have been doing for years, but that model failed because they chased terrible stars, and had terrible management. Proper management trumps all decisions. Having a good draft pick, and terrible talent evaluators means nothing. You'll just make back draft picks. Likewise, if you're a "treadmill" team and need to make a jump forward (or back) it can be (and has been) done with proper management.
Pointing to the entirety of the draft and saying this pool of players is ours, what you got, is pointless. Good teams draft good players in the draft while maintaining a competitive roster. It's harder, no doubt about it, but is it harder to draft late round gems with proper management or draft HoF talent in the lottery with incompetent management. The Spurs draft picks in the late first / second round rivals a lot of crap teams stuck in the lottery.
Last years team was one of the best teams in any sport I have had the pleasure to watch. I knew we weren't going to win a championship but it was immensely enjoyable. I'm curious to know if the pro-tankers were watching raptor ball when we were a tanking team?
No one said anything about tanking last year. Last years team was fine to watch, are you enjoying watching the current team as constructed?

Brinbe wrote:I think injuries are the only real way this works out. But it could happen. This team is only a playoff team if everyone stays healthy. Masai will have some tough decisions to make. We very well could be in a playoff position and the FO will have decide to sell on Lowry/Norm.
I'd imagine that would be a contentious decision, but logically, the right one. But we'll have to see if that's where their head's at.
The draft and the tank will work itself out. But the more important thing we don't know yet is what Masai/Bobby's mid/long-term plan is with this team.
What does plan B, without Giannis, look like in their eyes?
That's the discussion we need to be having and pondering.
They theoretically could use this pick (if it turns out to be a high one) as additional trade ballast to chase a star.
ATLTimekeeper wrote:Brinbe wrote:I think injuries are the only real way this works out. But it could happen. This team is only a playoff team if everyone stays healthy. Masai will have some tough decisions to make. We very well could be in a playoff position and the FO will have decide to sell on Lowry/Norm.
I'd imagine that would be a contentious decision, but logically, the right one. But we'll have to see if that's where their head's at.
The draft and the tank will work itself out. But the more important thing we don't know yet is what Masai/Bobby's mid/long-term plan is with this team.
What does plan B, without Giannis, look like in their eyes?
That's the discussion we need to be having and pondering.
They theoretically could use this pick (if it turns out to be a high one) as additional trade ballast to chase a star.
They don't plan long-term, because, as you can see, a season can just get away with you. They locked up Siakam, Fred and OG and will likely try and win with those guys, this year or the next.

Mark_83 wrote:If we fell outside of the top 5 who's the next best guy up? Barnes? Moody? Bouknight?


bluerap23 wrote:KL78192020 wrote:bluerap23 wrote:
Last years team was one of the best teams in any sport I have had the pleasure to watch. I knew we weren't going to win a championship but it was immensely enjoyable. I'm curious to know if the pro-tankers were watching raptor ball when we were a tanking team?
No one said anything about tanking last year. Last years team was fine to watch, are you enjoying watching the current team as constructed?
I am talking about rebuilding our team to that level next season.
As in - I don't want to repeat this season or worse for multiple years, thus i am anti-tank.