grant101 wrote:Mark_83 wrote:Psubs wrote:
I guess Black is putting up poor numbers but people think he can shoot better. He relies too much on his athleticism, if he gets hurt he's going to be affected a lot.
Black has impressive athleticism and feel, but most of his buckets are off the fast break or steals. His half court scoring basically consists of baseline drives off the pick and roll. I don't know how he and Scottie would play together tbh. Both need the ball in their hands and then there's Pascal. This is going to sound like blasphemy but I'd trade Scottie for any of Scoot, Miller, or Walker at this point if we're keeping Pascal and Yak and OG. He doesn't fit unless he adds shooting.
Was agreeing with this post, then nearly fell out of my chair reading the last part! Scottie for Scoot, absolutely. Scoot has the earmarks of is a bonafide superstar. For the other two, not even close for me (and I say this as a huge Jarace fan). Do you really see Jarace and Miller as primary options?
Keep in mind that was a conditional statement. If X then Y. I would rather the team move Pascal and put Scottie at the 4, where his lack of shooting would be muted.
If the team is going to build the roster around Pascal and assuming we keep Yak then we need shooters.
Also keep in mind nobody wanted us to pick Scottie. Few people had him ranked in their top 5 that year. I was one of the handful of people who wanted him at our pick and thought he would be a good player. Scoot is actually the guy out of that group I'd be most hesitant to move him for (but I'm the low guy on Scoot). Not that I don't think he'll be a good player or put up numbers, but we've seen this archetype before, and teams with players like that as their centerpiece have a ceiling. Miller and Walker are different types of players from Scottie, but imo they're every bit as talented as Scottie was in his draft year.
Not saying its the same situation, but I remember the year I was saying we should trade Jonas (who was highly regarded at the time) for one of the top picks in the draft to take Embiid. People were lambasting me, and calling me an idiot. But Embiid looked special and in retrospect I would have been right. Let me see if I can find that thread for receipts.
Again, not saying either of those players are going to eclipse Scottie like Embiid did Jonas, but in my opinion they can be at least as good and have a better skillset fit with our roster.
Do I see Miller or Jarace as primary options? Miller, yes. Jarace, not really. But Scottie is not a primary option either. Especially with Pascal around, which causes him to defer and be passive early in games.
I guess my problem is I don't really get attached to players. Even ones I pushed and wanted us to draft initially.