Tenacious_C wrote:^^ He's an option.
tbh, he seems a bit undersized to be a legit C at 6'9
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Tenacious_C wrote:^^ He's an option.
Tenacious_C wrote:http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Patric-Young-5746/
Is who I like.

Tenacious_C wrote:http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Patric-Young-5746/
Is who I like.
bboyskinnylegs wrote:Tenacious_C wrote:http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Patric-Young-5746/
Is who I like.
So what about the 19-year old Patric Young (who is 6'9", 220lbs, 7'1" to 7'2" wingspan, put up 3.4ppg/3.8rpg/0.8bpg in 17.8mpg) makes him a better C prospect than any of the three C's we're looking at this year?
truthrising wrote:Tenacious_C wrote:^^ He's an option.
tbh, he seems a bit undersized to be a legit C at 6'9
Strategist1 wrote:I think Kanter will have a better rookie season, maybe better 1st couple of seasons compared to Biyombo...but Biyombo will be better than him in the long run.
I still think Biyombo is the better prospect. Of course this is just my speculation... I really want more news/videos...etc. to get a better idea.
bboyskinnylegs wrote:Yeah I can't wait until the lottery (where if we get lucky we'll just end up having to choose between Kyrie/Williams) and the combine where we can get some definitive answers about some of these guys' length/athleticism etc. May 17th can't come soon enough.
All of the three bigs have a lot to gain or lose after the combine
Tenacious_C wrote:bboyskinnylegs wrote:Tenacious_C wrote:http://www.draftexpress.com/profile/Patric-Young-5746/
Is who I like.
So what about the 19-year old Patric Young (who is 6'9", 220lbs, 7'1" to 7'2" wingspan, put up 3.4ppg/3.8rpg/0.8bpg in 17.8mpg) makes him a better C prospect than any of the three C's we're looking at this year?
I like that he's getting another year of college hoops under his belt, where he can get bigger and better. I'm getting tired of the Euro experiment, I want a NA C playing for this team.
Strategist1 wrote:I think Kanter will have a better rookie season, maybe better 1st couple of seasons compared to Biyombo...but Biyombo will be better than him in the long run.
I still think Biyombo is the better prospect. Of course this is just my speculation... I really want more news/videos...etc. to get a better idea.
ansoncarter wrote:Strategist1 wrote:I think Kanter will have a better rookie season, maybe better 1st couple of seasons compared to Biyombo...but Biyombo will be better than him in the long run.
I still think Biyombo is the better prospect. Of course this is just my speculation... I really want more news/videos...etc. to get a better idea.
sounds like he'll be a huge fan favourite anyway. DX says he plays with the intensity of garnett. Toronto fans go nuts for that stuff
plus guy is a prince I can't picture an actual prince failing, he most likely has some kind of win gene
Youngblood wrote:
Isn't Al-Farouq Aminu a prince as well? I haven't seen that Garnett intensity though. Those are HUGE shoes to fill.
Strategist1 wrote:I think Kanter will have a better rookie season, maybe better 1st couple of seasons compared to Biyombo...but Biyombo will be better than him in the long run.
I still think Biyombo is the better prospect. Of course this is just my speculation... I really want more news/videos...etc. to get a better idea.

Indeed wrote:Strategist1 wrote:I think Kanter will have a better rookie season, maybe better 1st couple of seasons compared to Biyombo...but Biyombo will be better than him in the long run.
I still think Biyombo is the better prospect. Of course this is just my speculation... I really want more news/videos...etc. to get a better idea.
Unless Kanter has injury issue, otherwise, Kanter should be the better player.
Kanter is more rounded, he has game in different aspect, which helps your teammates a lot.
As much as Ben Wallace can do, he needs much better offense surrounding him, and not every system fits his style of play (Chicago/Cleveland). So Kanter should be the better player if he measure out with some C attributes.
ATLTimekeeper wrote:Indeed wrote:Strategist1 wrote:I think Kanter will have a better rookie season, maybe better 1st couple of seasons compared to Biyombo...but Biyombo will be better than him in the long run.
I still think Biyombo is the better prospect. Of course this is just my speculation... I really want more news/videos...etc. to get a better idea.
Unless Kanter has injury issue, otherwise, Kanter should be the better player.
Kanter is more rounded, he has game in different aspect, which helps your teammates a lot.
As much as Ben Wallace can do, he needs much better offense surrounding him, and not every system fits his style of play (Chicago/Cleveland). So Kanter should be the better player if he measure out with some C attributes.
Ben Wallace needed the most pedestrian cast of teammates to win a championship in NBA history. It's not like he was surrounded with offensive dynamos. Billups and Rip were really the only two above average scorers. They never even had one legit first option on offense.
An impact player that doesn't require touches is going to fit in on any team.