ImageImageImageImageImage

Yahoo/Sportsnet: J. O

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer

Nessah
Pro Prospect
Posts: 765
And1: 26
Joined: Jul 24, 2006

Re: Sportsnet: Trade for JO agreed in principle 

Post#181 » by Nessah » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:13 pm

they had a BREAKING NEWS interruption on 680 news 5 minutes ago for this "trade in principle"

Wow...BC has balls! I think Chris will be happy.
User avatar
booyah_child
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,651
And1: 818
Joined: Oct 26, 2007
       

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#182 » by booyah_child » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:13 pm

ohhla2000 wrote:I said this on Monday and will say it again: Jermaine is EXACTLY what this team needs. A defensive minded shotblocker/rebounder who is in his Prime. (based on his age) If i could have picked one guy in the league who was actually attainable it would have to be this guy.

It hurts to lose TJ. On the other hand, Jose was the better point guard. Ill never forget TJ's monster 5 game run in 05-06 against Portland-Seattle-Minnesota when he carried the team while Bosh was out. I'll miss him and certainly moniter Pacer games to see how he does.

Today we took a step toward competing with Boston-Orlando-Detroit. WE finally have a REAL CENTER!!! From Bradley-Mccoy-Mosio-Hoffa-Woods-Bargnani to Jermaine is an upgrade that cant even be calculated.


Didn't people say he was unhappy with playing the 5?
Image
User avatar
notic101
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,951
And1: 48
Joined: Aug 19, 2003

Re: Sportsnet: Trade for JO agreed in principle 

Post#183 » by notic101 » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:14 pm

Good luck to both Rasho and TJ, hope they have success in Indiana and elsewhere they go, they helped establish a favourable culture in the Raptorland the past two seasons, and I appreciate their contributions, controversy aside.

Welcome to TO, JO, let the t-shirt sales commence.
Image
douggood
General Manager
Posts: 9,767
And1: 6,550
Joined: Jun 13, 2001

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#184 » by douggood » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:14 pm

hoopstarr3 wrote:You guys, stop lying to yourselves to feel better about this trade. If JO is really healthy, why wouldn't the Pacers just keep him and his expiring contract?

for the same reason the raps didnt keep vince, sometimes you have to move forward.
s e n s i
RealGM
Posts: 17,110
And1: 3,636
Joined: Mar 19, 2008
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#185 » by s e n s i » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:14 pm

I'm f'n excited.

Jose/Roko
AP
Moon/Kapono
Bosh/Bargs/Hump
O'Neal/Bargs

We instantly go from having one of the softest frontcourts in the league to having one of the most feared. If Bargs steps up his play and averages say 15-6 off the bench, I think we should be in the top half of the conference regardless if we get that wing player or not. I know 3 bigs might not be enough in the long run, but who says BC is done dealing after this. My guess is he'll still try and acquire a solid rotation wing, and possibly another servicable big other than Hump, like a vet or something.
galacticos2 wrote:MLB needs to introduce an Amnesty clause. Bautista would be my first victim.

Bautista outplays his contract by more than $70 million over the next four seasons (2013-2016).
|llsT oNe
Starter
Posts: 2,264
And1: 165
Joined: Nov 13, 2004

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#186 » by |llsT oNe » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:14 pm

I wonder what happened to revive the trade and if BC caved with the pick. I hope we buy a pick in the 20's, ala Portland.
Bank Shot
RealGM
Posts: 16,339
And1: 12,091
Joined: Jun 24, 2007

Re: Sportsnet: Trade for JO agreed in principle 

Post#187 » by Bank Shot » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:14 pm

Luv 4 da game wrote:Baston or humphries ? hmmm only time will tell.

So no late second rounder coming back ? :(


Pleeeeeeaaaasssseeeeee be Baston. I don't want to have Bargs as our only back-up big. If not Baston then hopefully Joey, I really want to keep Hump.
User avatar
Vinsane15
Veteran
Posts: 2,734
And1: 21
Joined: Jan 13, 2008
Location: Tdot

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#188 » by Vinsane15 » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:14 pm

hoopstarr3 wrote:You guys, stop lying to yourselves to feel better about this trade. If JO is really healthy, why wouldn't the Pacers just keep him and his expiring contract?


I think he probably told Larry Bird that he needs a new change in life and he is tired of living in Indiana...
User avatar
raps4life~
General Manager
Posts: 7,664
And1: 25
Joined: Mar 13, 2007
Location: California
       

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#189 » by raps4life~ » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:15 pm

hoopstarr3 wrote:You guys, stop lying to yourselves to feel better about this trade. If JO is really healthy, why wouldn't the Pacers just keep him and his expiring contract?


wow that makes a load of sense.
Raptors90102
Banned User
Posts: 5,050
And1: 3
Joined: Feb 27, 2007

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#190 » by Raptors90102 » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:15 pm

Youngblood wrote:
Alfred wrote:
UNC Tar Heel Fan wrote:What are the expections? From this board?

I want 77 games, 19 points (because Bosh will still be the leading scorer at 22-23 a game) 11 rpg (what we NEED badly), 1.5 bpg, and a good 37-39 minutes a game.


Almost positive this isn't going to happen. He isn't going to get the number of shots he took in Indiana, and that might not be a bad thing considering his offensive efficiency.

Here is my bet:
14.5/8.5/1.5 on 47% shooting (from a smaller workload) in 33 minutes a game. With good defense.

Bryan will also have to GET IT THROUGH SAM'S HEAD that he can't ride Jermaine like he rode Bosh this past season. His body will simply break down.


+ a gazillion!


Sam will HAVE to ride JO hard cuz right at this moment, we don't have any other bigs besides the wildly inconsistent bargnani and humphries to back em up. None of them can play centre and none of them can be consistent.

I would be all for moving Kapono to the backup SG spot, play Moon at SF and if somehow we can land Charlie V for cheap, get him to play backup SF and PF. Something like this:

Jose (34) / Roko (14) / Vet PG
AP (28) / Kapono (14) / Roko (6)
Moon (28) / Kapono (8) / Charlie (12)
Bosh (34) / Charlie (14) / Hump
JO (30) / Bargnani (18) / Hump

Play Bargnani STRICTLY at Center and play him inside. Force him to play inside and if not, you always have Hump to step in. I agree that Defense will be a crapshoot with Charlie and Kapono on the floor, but charlie can rebound and play inside-out. Will be cheap as well.
ShaqSlamsU
Banned User
Posts: 12,552
And1: 14
Joined: Dec 17, 2001

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#191 » by ShaqSlamsU » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:15 pm

hoopstarr3 wrote:You guys, stop lying to yourselves to feel better about this trade. If JO is really healthy, why wouldn't the Pacers just keep him and his expiring contract?


Maybe he wanted out? Who knows?
User avatar
sh00n
RealGM
Posts: 20,409
And1: 1,996
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
Contact:
       

Re: Sportsnet: Trade for JO agreed in principle 

Post#192 » by sh00n » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:16 pm

Bank Shot wrote:
Luv 4 da game wrote:Baston or humphries ? hmmm only time will tell.

So no late second rounder coming back ? :(


Pleeeeeeaaaasssseeeeee be Baston. I don't want to have Bargs as our only back-up big. If not Baston then hopefully Joey, I really want to keep Hump.

For another trade. :eyebrows:
Support your local artist, kids: http://www.katsenhakeron.com
@katsenhaker0n on the bird app
Nessah
Pro Prospect
Posts: 765
And1: 26
Joined: Jul 24, 2006

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#193 » by Nessah » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:17 pm

Charlie Villanueva for TJ Ford
TJ Ford for Jermaine O'Neal
......
CV for JO
User avatar
bakafool
RealGM
Posts: 10,839
And1: 4,651
Joined: Nov 03, 2005

Re: Yahoo/Sportsnet: J. O 

Post#194 » by bakafool » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:17 pm

If the 17th isn't included I would be happy and jumping for joy. If it was, I'd still be happy. Hopefully Hump isn't included as well.
Noooo!!! Not Possible! Not Possible! - Comcast commentator after the shot by Mo Peterson.
User avatar
5DOM
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 40,216
And1: 1,811
Joined: Aug 30, 2004
Contact:
       

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#195 » by 5DOM » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:17 pm

hoopstarr3 wrote:You guys, stop lying to yourselves to feel better about this trade. If JO is really healthy, why wouldn't the Pacers just keep him and his expiring contract?


because they are getting assets back;

tj ford who is a top 10-15 PG
expiring contract in rasho
#17 pick.
Image
User avatar
booyah_child
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,651
And1: 818
Joined: Oct 26, 2007
       

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#196 » by booyah_child » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:17 pm

hoopstarr3 wrote:You guys, stop lying to yourselves to feel better about this trade. If JO is really healthy, why wouldn't the Pacers just keep him and his expiring contract?


Maybe they want to start rebuilding already, and don't want to deal with him anymore. :dontknow:
Image
User avatar
garbage time
Starter
Posts: 2,364
And1: 1
Joined: Apr 27, 2008

Re: Yahoo/Sportsnet: J. O 

Post#197 » by garbage time » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:17 pm

I'm thinking this makes Raptors among the elite in the East.. That's of course provided O'Neal doesn't become unhappy in T.O or has another injury etc..
ibtl
User avatar
Yosemite Dan
RealGM
Posts: 11,431
And1: 7,893
Joined: Nov 16, 2006

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#198 » by Yosemite Dan » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:17 pm

I don't like this trade at all and had this been proposed last year at this time most of you would have agreed. The need to get rid of Ford should not cloud the Raps judgement because we will be lucky to get 50-60 games out of Jermaine and with Bosh's questionable durability there is a strong chance that next season blows up in our faces and we are a lottery team. This seems like a deal Isiah Thomas would make. Jermaine has one bad wonky knee that's just gonna get worse and don't delude yourself because when you are that big and heavy and have had multiple problems with the same knee it slows you down considerably even when you are supposedly healthy.

This reminds me of the excitement when the 76ers got Webber. Much ado about a player who has clearly seen better days and is on a downward slope. We need some perimeter defence in the worst way and given the fragile health of O'Neal at this point he is not much of an upgrade over Rasho and will play less games. So basically we gave away Ford and the 17th pick for free. Seems like a desperation move by BC because there's nothing else he can do.
User avatar
sh00n
RealGM
Posts: 20,409
And1: 1,996
Joined: Jul 15, 2006
Contact:
       

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#199 » by sh00n » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:18 pm

5DOM wrote:
hoopstarr3 wrote:You guys, stop lying to yourselves to feel better about this trade. If JO is really healthy, why wouldn't the Pacers just keep him and his expiring contract?


because they are getting assets back;

tj ford who is a top 10-15 PG
expiring contract in rasho
#17 pick.

And it's Granger's team now. He's been shopped around for the past few seasons.
Support your local artist, kids: http://www.katsenhakeron.com
@katsenhaker0n on the bird app
Drewser3131
Senior
Posts: 719
And1: 0
Joined: Oct 26, 2001

Re: Yahoo: O 

Post#200 » by Drewser3131 » Wed Jun 25, 2008 10:18 pm

Rhettmatic wrote:Sportsnet just said it was a done deal. Rasho, 17th pick, T.J., and a player to be named later.


I was watching...it said agreed in principle, not done deal. Agreed in principle is the same tidbit we got from the yahoo article, so this isn't a done deal yet.

Return to Toronto Raptors