ArthurVandelay wrote:Indeed wrote:ArthurVandelay wrote:
Now you’re moving goal posts.
I said they had comparable stats overall, with some better and some worse.
And again, Maluach is putting up comparable numbers as a freshman as an 18 year old when Williams was 19 and Lively 20. Plus he has been playing for 5 years.
He has better TS%, FTr, Reb%, WS/40, BPM as a freshman than either.
I’m not saying the blk% and ast% aren’t concerns, they are. But I’m not going to put the whole evaluation and projection on two stats either.
FWIW over the last 8 games Maluach has raised his blk% from 5.8 to 6.9%. Again, another example of progress and him playing better as the games matter more and competition gets harder.
So what is wrong for me saying him "two years from being two years"?
He is a year young, and to me, that is at least two years away from other bigs being drafted that high, no?
All you are pointing is "potential", which isn't it exactly what I am saying "two years from being two years", and that is the only thing I said, no?
Yeah, I'm probably misinterpreting 2 years away from 2 years away. My interpretation of that line is it being more of a slander and a guy who never develops....like our very own Bruno the OG 2 years away....
Yeah, no development would be the same, just that there are certain risks in players reaching the full potential.
The average case of Maluach for me is a bigger longer Boucher.
Scouting report:



















