Alfred wrote:TDotRep wrote:Clearly that analogy is terrible because if you are comparing the accuracy of a doctor to the accuracy of the scouts at dx than year heart must be located on your foot after a surgery, they are people who grew up watching ball and making a website. They mess up we mess up. Doctors goto school for more than 8 years these guys? If they are so good at what they do im sure they would be apart of an organization.
They are a professional scouting website that taps the shoulders of real NBA scouts. You don't think that scouting is a real profession? Then why do NBA teams employ them, and pay them handsomely?
In any case your argument "They mess up, we mess up" is a pretty flawed way of thinking. Scouting isn't an exact science, but there is certainly skill and dedication required in coming to conclusions about prospects. Wall Street traders mess up too, but if they messed up more than they actually made the correct decision, they'd be broke. The same thing applies here. If DraftExpress was constantly wrong about prospects and their rankings, then nobody would take them seriously -- but they aren't and people do.
Wall street analogy is better, and my argument was there is a science behind being a doctor of course people mess up but it is less likely to say a doctor would, thats why your analogy is terrible.



















