docholliday99 wrote:Yallbecrazy wrote:I don't think anyone realizes where we would have been without Fred last year. He had a down year in a system that didn't suit him and was still our 2nd most important player.
That's lost around here it seems. I believe MU will resign him.
ATLTimekeeper wrote:Spates wrote:You're not really paying attention to what I'm saying. I'm not suggesting Scottie run PNRs, I'm saying we should figure out how to maximize his strengths and the strengths of others. PNRs are utilized for its advantage creation. It's not mandatory. If you don't have people who can run it well. Then don't. Fred isn't proficient enough to lament his loss because of the PNR. The offense isn't good anyways. Denver, Sacramento, and GSW used the least pNRs this year... Do have a problem with their offense?
It's absolutely mandatory. I don't think you understand a pretty basic truth here: the PnR is the staple of every single NBA offense. Some use it more than others, but it's still more frequently used than any other type of offensive initiator in the half court. So Denver, Sacramento and GSW are still using PnR more than any other play. So what Los was saying is accurate, if you lose Fred his function on offense as a ballhandler has to be replaced. That's typically "the PG" whether that looks like Chris Paul, Steph Curry, Jamal Murray or DeMar DeRozan, that's the guy with the ball running pick and rolls.
It's not all speed. Pace, change of speed, change of direction, etc. Do I really need to explain further? Dowtin has got a bit of herky jerky. I want to see him get an opportunity. I think you're actually oversimplifying things. It's about leveraging creation opportunities.
Herky jerky doesn't get guarded tightly without a jump shot. They just back up and dare him to shoot over length.
Also, I didn't know Gabe was a PG but I could describe his game to you..... What matters more — knowing what a player does on the court or knowing the position they're labelled with?
So you knew he did PG things on the court, but didn't know he was a PG. Okay.
This is a headache. I'm stuck in an argument I don't want to have. Where can we agree to disagree?
I'll move away from the unnecessary. Ball screens are an important part of the game. They open up a variety of options for teams to move defenses, get players into space, create matchup advantages, etc. What I'm contesting is that losing Fred is a huge issue regarding ball screen usage. Losing the primary handler in a bad shooting offense isn't a tragedy. He shot terribly and had a pretty bad assist to usage ratio. Democratize the ball screens and adapt your play initiation.
You really need to move away from this PG argument. Typically when a teams best player is a non-big, that player will be using the most ball screens whether pg, sg, or sf. Tatum and Butler use the most ball screens for their teams. Jokic creates most looks for his team and he barely uses at ball screens.