FluLikeSymptoms wrote:He's going in the lottery. Not a great pick for us but maybe GSW looks for Bogut insurance.
If they look for Bogut insurance, they go with Zeller over Leonard.
Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
FluLikeSymptoms wrote:He's going in the lottery. Not a great pick for us but maybe GSW looks for Bogut insurance.
drew_8730 wrote:wow i cant beleive there is a meyers leonard thread....this guy is a bust for sure id rather draft marquis teague at 8 than meyers leonard.
Dr Mufasa wrote:
PRODUCTION: Meyers was slightly better across the board. Higher volume (PTs), much higher efficiency (TS%/2P%), higher REBs, much higher BLKs due to his size, much better FTA/FGA. PJIII has the slight edge in A/T, Ast, and TOs. PER was 23.9 for Leonard vs 21.2 for PJIII. Leonard had by far the highest PER on his team, PJIII was 3rd behind Acy and Jackson. There were 3 players with a higher TS% than PJIII on his team with two others tied with him at .54, Leonard had the highest TS% on his team by a full 6 pts with .62 vs .56 and 3rd highest TS% on his team was 10 points behind him at .52. Leonard compared to his teammates dominated in the efficient scoring, rebounding and blk categories. Nothing PJIII did statistically separated himself from teammates.
FIT ON OUR TEAM: PJIII gives us the same type of production and role Bargnani does, unless you make the ill fated decision of believing a player with his size and ball skills can be a 3. IMO I like the Leonard fit more because then we have a dual 7 footers, twin towers type of lineup, plus he and Bargnani can play together a lot better than PJIII/Bargnani. I'm as sold on Meyers offensively as I am PJIII and I'm far, far more sold on his defensive potential
There is next to no reason to be in a mode of saying draft PJIII and "hahaha fk this guy" with Leonard at the same time. PJIII has every reason to like or dislike him that Meyers does.
Weems wrote:He's a lot more interesting than guys like the Jones', Zeller, Miller, Marshall, Rivers, and Lilliard to me. 7 footer who possesses a nice combo of athleticism, skills, and potential. I was originally indifferent to Valanciunas last season, but opened to it because I saw some good qualities and a 7 ft tall player in an uninspiring draft position (5th in a weak draft, similar situation here where we're projected 8th/9th or whatever). My feeling is that we're a really bad basketball who shouldn't be looking for fit, so why not be open to anything? He could easily be BPA imo.
Al_Oliver wrote:Weems wrote:He's a lot more interesting than guys like the Jones', Zeller, Miller, Marshall, Rivers, and Lilliard to me. 7 footer who possesses a nice combo of athleticism, skills, and potential. I was originally indifferent to Valanciunas last season, but opened to it because I saw some good qualities and a 7 ft tall player in an uninspiring draft position (5th in a weak draft, similar situation here where we're projected 8th/9th or whatever). My feeling is that we're a really bad basketball who shouldn't be looking for fit, so why not be open to anything? He could easily be BPA imo.
but he's not even one of the best 15 available. wroten, waiters, rivers, jones and Q, are all way better options in the back of the lottery. those are talents that even fit us better too

kmatrixg wrote:FluLikeSymptoms wrote:He's going in the lottery. Not a great pick for us but maybe GSW looks for Bogut insurance.
If they look for Bogut insurance, they go with Zeller over Leonard.
Dr Mufasa wrote:

lolwut wrote:Dr Mufasa wrote:
I've never seen this guy play, but one look at this picture and I can tell you he sucks.
FluLikeSymptoms wrote:kmatrixg wrote:FluLikeSymptoms wrote:He's going in the lottery. Not a great pick for us but maybe GSW looks for Bogut insurance.
If they look for Bogut insurance, they go with Zeller over Leonard.
Maybe, I wasn't necessarily trying to replace Bogut's game or to fill-in next year, more of a long-term insurance policy in the event he gets hit by lightning or final destination or something.
I do think Zeller is underrated and that he could go in the top 10. I don't know why anybody would take Sullinger over him if they were looking for a bulky scorer to potentially help next year, he's probably 3 inches taller and that jump-hook will translate. They'll both stink on D.
kmatrixg wrote:For the record, I'm not saying Jones is a sureshot superstar. I'm also not saying Leonard is as good as he is. If Jones is a 4, he's going to need a lot of work to become stronger and more post-oriented. He's a fantastic rebounder and defender so he's got that going for him. Leonard, if he wants to become a starting Center, needs to get a lot stronger (because remember, pounds don't equal muscle) and work on his offense to the point of not being entirely dependent on post-feeds. But, at least he can make free throws.
Dr Mufasa wrote:I believe Jonas will be one of the biggest draft busts of all time.To me he's an unathletic Javale McGee.
Darknemo2000 wrote:I probably was too influenced mentally by the 2011 summer where Jonas made meyers his bitch and Meyers had no chance stopping him even with double-triple teams. He could not defend and could not rebound and on O he looked too scared of Jonas to make some noise under the basket.
Whenever I look at Meyers I remember those moments from he game and its to hard for me to consider him being worthy of Raptors pick.
Dr Mufasa wrote:He reminds me a lot of a more athletic/jacked Valanciunas offensively, with elite hands and efficiency and both players liking those hookshots. Leonard looks better in the post and also hits those midrange shots in the way we expect Valanciunas can learn to but don't know about yet. I consider Leonard to be the better offensive prospect outright, while Valanciunas has him in rebounding and likely defensive aggressiveness.
lolwut wrote:Dr Mufasa wrote:
I've never seen this guy play, but one look at this picture and I can tell you he sucks.

xprt wrote:He isnt even lottery pick and Raptors arent taking another C unless his name is Drummond
edquantum wrote:Dr Mufasa wrote:He reminds me a lot of a more athletic/jacked Valanciunas offensively, with elite hands and efficiency and both players liking those hookshots. Leonard looks better in the post and also hits those midrange shots in the way we expect Valanciunas can learn to but don't know about yet. I consider Leonard to be the better offensive prospect outright, while Valanciunas has him in rebounding and likely defensive aggressiveness.
Lithuania U19 Team 108, USA U19 Team 75
Leonard: ZERO points, ZERO rebounds, FOULED OUT in 8 min.
Valanciunas: 23 points, 11 rebounds in 25 min.
Lithuania U19 Team 105, USA U19 Team 107
Leonard: 3 points, 3 rebounds in 13 min.
Valanciunas: 30 points, 15 rebounds, 4 blocks in 38 min.
You are definitely right.