ImageImageImageImageImage

Grading the Ingram Trade

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer

Grading the Ingram Trade

A
113
37%
B
129
42%
C
36
12%
D
21
7%
F
6
2%
 
Total votes: 305

User avatar
Childs
RealGM
Posts: 12,980
And1: 29,007
Joined: Jun 23, 2010
 

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#21 » by Childs » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:14 pm

B- or C+. He’s pretty injury prone and if we have to give a max, wouldn’t be happy about that.
Dexjackson
Junior
Posts: 270
And1: 209
Joined: Apr 03, 2022
       

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#22 » by Dexjackson » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:15 pm

Duffman100 wrote:Tough, I gave it a B but...

How much is he signed for?
Do we tank the end of the season?

Those two could swing it up to an A or down to a C.


This is how I feel about it too. It's a B for me now given what we know of the current situation. The salary, his availability, and fit will determine whether the grade goes up and down. So many variables right now that could shift it either direction.
User avatar
Jim Todd Jr.
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,444
And1: 1,670
Joined: Jul 10, 2006
Location: TORONTO
     

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#23 » by Jim Todd Jr. » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:19 pm

Tanking doesnt matter much now. We are finishing bottom 2 and we arent climbing up from bottom 7.

Look at lotto odds, its not that impactful. And this is a two man draft IMO.
Chips with the dip baybeeee.
User avatar
zong
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,290
And1: 102
Joined: Sep 27, 2007
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#24 » by zong » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:21 pm

A if he's extended to a decent deal
C if he walks or gets overpaid
Since neither has happened, I chose B :P
User avatar
hyper316
RealGM
Posts: 14,788
And1: 10,074
Joined: Dec 23, 2006
   

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#25 » by hyper316 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:22 pm

bluerap23 wrote:This gives BI a 200M Contract (40M AAV)
Image


Looks good, Scottie top earners, entire team under 30yrs old
User avatar
Nature
Sophomore
Posts: 222
And1: 454
Joined: Jul 16, 2019
 

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#26 » by Nature » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:22 pm

A
Image
User avatar
bluerap23
Head Coach
Posts: 7,165
And1: 7,298
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
   

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#27 » by bluerap23 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:23 pm

Kinda crazy how many dislike the trade. Gave up expirings and a pick likely around 20th for a possible all-star entering his prime that fits into the starting lineup very well. I’m not sure if it will work with RJ but he is a bigger talent and better fit than RJ. Maybe RJ has to go to bench but that isn’t a terrible outcome. We’re still tanking this year and we weren’t tanking next year either way. Low risk, high reward.
Image
User avatar
Parataxis
General Manager
Posts: 9,682
And1: 5,943
Joined: Jan 31, 2010
Location: Penticton, BC
       

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#28 » by Parataxis » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:24 pm

INC

Won't be able to reasonably assess a grade until we see BIs next contract. It's absolutely dependent on if (and how much for) we're re-signing him.
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,246
And1: 13,860
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#29 » by Los_29 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:24 pm

In terms of value, it’s an A. None of us thought he could be acquired so cheaply.
brownbobcat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,837
And1: 3,789
Joined: Jun 09, 2006

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#30 » by brownbobcat » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:25 pm

HumbleRen wrote:B because I don’t know what his contract will look like.

An A if he isn’t overpaid. We gave up nothing of value for an all star caliber player when healthy.

Yeah, big INC grade right now. I'd say borderline All Star when healthy, but that's splitting hairs.
User avatar
720
RealGM
Posts: 33,097
And1: 67,701
Joined: Nov 01, 2012
Location: Malton
     

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#31 » by 720 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:26 pm

Duffman100 wrote:Tough, I gave it a B but...

How much is he signed for?
Do we tank the end of the season?

Those two could swing it up to an A or down to a C.

With this trade it all be ensures one of IQ or RJ is gone. The finances just doesn’t make sense. We’re not good enough to be a 1st apron team. Unless Ingram signs for something less.
Image
Image
User avatar
Duffman100
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 48,054
And1: 72,588
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
   

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#32 » by Duffman100 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:27 pm

720 wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:Tough, I gave it a B but...

How much is he signed for?
Do we tank the end of the season?

Those two could swing it up to an A or down to a C.

With this trade it all be ensures one of IQ or RJ is gone. The finances just doesn’t make sense. We’re not good enough to be a 1st apron team.


I'm good with that. I'm not overly attached to either of those guys.
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,931
And1: 2,203
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#33 » by Shakril » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:28 pm

B : If he is healthy with us
D- : if he continues to be injured like his whole career
User avatar
mad-man
Rookie
Posts: 1,140
And1: 747
Joined: Oct 15, 2009
     

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#34 » by mad-man » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:29 pm

canz55 wrote:I'm a huge supporter of this FO but I gave it a "C" ultimately.

I'm not upset at the cost but this team became a lot more expensive with players who are huge questionmarks i.e. the health of IQ, BI going forward and the viability of a player like RJ starting.

Sent from my SM-S908W using RealGM mobile app


Im not concerned about the health of anyone on our team based on this season.

Clearly we are being overly cautious to rack up losses.
-Demar Derozan: "We haven't did nothing"
earthtone
Junior
Posts: 477
And1: 575
Joined: Nov 25, 2024
     

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#35 » by earthtone » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:31 pm

Shakril wrote:B : If he is healthy with us
D- : if he continues to be injured like his whole career

He’s averaged 78% of games played per season before this one, and that’s including a couple years where he was shut down to tank and the end of the year.

He’s no ironman, but the injury concerns are way overblown, especially considering he comes from the worst organization in the league when it comes to injury management.
KP730
Junior
Posts: 416
And1: 420
Joined: Jan 13, 2008

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#36 » by KP730 » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:31 pm

gave it an A because:

- bought LOW on a very talented player who is now the team’s best pure scorer. assuming BI resigns, this is good asset management

- doesn’t impact our tank this year if we don’t want it to. Ie. BI can sit most of the remaining season, playing limited minutes only to assess how he best fits. Plus Brown and KO were key to our recent winning stretch, losing them helps the tank

- prepares this team to start winning next season. while this season makes complete sense to tank the way it’s gone - we can’t be perpetually losing. need to start winning ASAP after this season is done with
MiamiSPX
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,067
And1: 6,254
Joined: May 19, 2023
         

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#37 » by MiamiSPX » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:33 pm

A from me.
MiamiSPX
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,067
And1: 6,254
Joined: May 19, 2023
         

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#38 » by MiamiSPX » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:37 pm

720 wrote:
Duffman100 wrote:Tough, I gave it a B but...

How much is he signed for?
Do we tank the end of the season?

Those two could swing it up to an A or down to a C.

With this trade it all be ensures one of IQ or RJ is gone. The finances just doesn’t make sense. We’re not good enough to be a 1st apron team. Unless Ingram signs for something less.


I think this acquisition further cements my belief that RJ is not held in such high regard with our FO as he is with some of us fans (only because he's Canadian IMO). Never gets mentioned by Masai as a core piece. I know it could just be an oversight but this has happened multiple times. We used to joke about the same thing with GTJ and it turned out to be true, the FO didn't care for him at all.
tsherkin
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 92,573
And1: 32,100
Joined: Oct 14, 2003
 

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#39 » by tsherkin » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:38 pm

earthtone wrote:He’s averaged 78% of games played per season before this one, and that’s including a couple years where he was shut down to tank and the end of the year.

He’s no ironman, but the injury concerns are way overblown, especially considering he comes from the worst organization in the league when it comes to injury management.


I mean, no. That's definitely wrong.

18-24...

59, 52, 62, 61 (this is only 11 games missed), 55 (this is 17 games missed), 45, 64.

He misses a lot of games. That is an average of 22.3 games missed per year over the past 7 seasons, and he hasn't been healthy this season either.

There isn't space to argue that he doesn't have significant availability issues.
User avatar
Mak
RealGM
Posts: 26,841
And1: 4,929
Joined: Apr 24, 2001
Location: Fire Nurse

Re: Grading the Ingram Trade 

Post#40 » by Mak » Thu Feb 6, 2025 3:39 pm

A right now, a lot can change if Ingram is injured or gets the full max.

Return to Toronto Raptors