VanWest82 wrote:Wonder if this means Knicks are no longer in the running for a big FVV contract: https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/260154/Fred-VanVleet-Seen-As-More-Effective-For-Established-Team-Than-As-The-Lone-StarLeague sources see Fred VanVleet as being more effective on an established than "being the lone star," according to Marc Berman of the New York Post.
I'd be ecstatic if Raptors could get Fred locked up for < 20M AAV but this stare down feels a little risky. Fred was our second best player last year behind Lowry who's turning 35. Fred is a team leader and the only every-day PG option on the roster. If Siakam is a good deal @ 30M+ how is Fred not a good deal @ 20M when Fred is currently the better player?
Who said Siakam at 30m is a good deal? Also we don’t have a superstar yet. If we did, I’d be ok with Fred at 20m, max. Teams without superstars shouldn’t start filling up their cap with average starters on 20+ mill contracts imo. Especially if they have flaws that can’t be overcome (height). I think there are certain situations where I’d want Fred back, but with our current roster/cap situation I don’t personally want to retain Fred at all, let alone at 20+ mill. We need as clean a slate as possible for Masai to do what he can when the Giannis FA starts. Hampering that for a slightly above average but undersized PG is too risky imo. His market value as an NBA player, and his value to us doesn’t equate.















Masai’s Rebuilt Raptors 








