Parataxis wrote:arbsn wrote:Raps1103 wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
…. Yea, that’s what happened .. it wasn’t cuz they truly believed that Barnes was the better prospect ( has many did, some even thinking Barnes could go top 2) it was BECAUSE THEY WANTED TO BE CUTE
![]()
![]()
Yes this is what I think. When Suggs was unanimously a top 4 prospect and Masai and Co decide to "ZAG" and pick Barnes, that is being cute. They talked themselves into their guy. Very cute, you went your own way and picked your guy. I did not say whether they were right or wrong. But it is unreasonable to argue that Suggs was not a clear top 4 prospect when every expert, mock draft, etc had him in the top 4.
Suggs very obviously wasn't a unanimous top 4 prospect.
Source - he wasn't drafted in the top 4.![]()
![]()
I always chuckle when people say Suggs was the consensus top 4 pick. If the reports are true, Orlando and OKC would've taken Barnes at #4 as well. Chad Ford was saying some teams had Barnes as high as #3.
People need to stop getting their information from places like NBA Draft Net.
