Mikestro wrote:There's no way Prince should be starting if we want to be considered a contending team in the east. At this stage in his career he should be coming off the bench.
+1 he's done.
Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford
Mikestro wrote:There's no way Prince should be starting if we want to be considered a contending team in the east. At this stage in his career he should be coming off the bench.
Rapsobsessed7 wrote:Raps Militia wrote:However, there are also flaws in this trade, Prince is a terrible player now, he's still a very good defender, but he's offensively null, no longer able to pull from 3, he can't shoot free throws, and he has terrible percentages.
Do we need offense from that spot though?
Lowry (33) / Ennis (15)
Derozan (24) / Vas (24)
Ross (26) / Derozan (9) / Prince (13)
I'm fine with him getting like 13 minutes. Plays defense, veteran guy to teach the young ones and you let Ross have a full season at SF see how he does. Then you can properly evaluate if you need to move him or not.
Plenty of offense off the bench with Ennis/Vasquez/Patt

m83588333 wrote:The last time the Raptors had two first-round picks, they drafted Chuck V and Joey Graham, passing twice on Danny Granger.
12:23pm - 26 Jun 14
Eric Koreen

RaptorsFTL wrote:SkywalkerAC wrote:The 37th is a good pick. Wish we could hang onto it somehow.
Think of it this way though, 22 is better, and it's not as though Salmons was lighting up the world. Pure salary dump by Memphis, and we're getting the much better pick.
Salmons=/Prince
22>>>37
Landomar wrote:This is going to be disappointing when Memphis (probably) nixes this trade. Still, if it goes through, it's going to make tonight even more exciting.
grumpwalter wrote:m83588333 wrote:The last time the Raptors had two first-round picks, they drafted Chuck V and Joey Graham, passing twice on Danny Granger.
12:23pm - 26 Jun 14
Eric Koreen
As I said before, passing on Granger is not like passing on Iguodala, Granger did have a nice career, however, at the time of the draft, there were questions about his knees.
Raps Militia wrote:Rapsobsessed7 wrote:Raps Militia wrote:However, there are also flaws in this trade, Prince is a terrible player now, he's still a very good defender, but he's offensively null, no longer able to pull from 3, he can't shoot free throws, and he has terrible percentages.
Do we need offense from that spot though?
Lowry (33) / Ennis (15)
Derozan (24) / Vas (24)
Ross (26) / Derozan (9) / Prince (13)
I'm fine with him getting like 13 minutes. Plays defense, veteran guy to teach the young ones and you let Ross have a full season at SF see how he does. Then you can properly evaluate if you need to move him or not.
Plenty of offense off the bench with Ennis/Vasquez/Patt
I would prefer to get rid of him, sincerely.
7 million is too much.
Same goes for Fields, Hayes and maybe Novak.
We can't afford so many bad players with contracts so high, they are a waste of money and cap space used badly.
With this, I welcome this trade. A better pick, and Prince is still a better player than Salmons.
Kevin Willis wrote:What does Memphis gain? Is this a salary dump on their end so they can go after someone else Or lose Prince's salary and get a second round pick that they don't have to give a guaranteed contract? Do they already see that Prince cannot be their starting SF?
At 37 they can actually get a good wing defender to replace Prince for less money.

The Boy wrote:I'd rather have Pondexter than Prince

m83588333 wrote:The last time the Raptors had two first-round picks, they drafted Chuck V and Joey Graham, passing twice on Danny Granger.
12:23pm - 26 Jun 14
Eric Koreen
CrymeTime wrote:I could Massai then Moving #20 to:
Utah for #23 and #35
or
Charlotte for #24 and #45
I hope we pull off something like the Mavs, being able to trade down twice, and still got the player they wanted.
In 2009 the Mavs traded:
#22 for #24 and 2 second rounders
then
#24 for #25 and a second rounder.
so basically they got 3 second rounders by moving down 4 spots.

grumpwalter wrote:m83588333 wrote:The last time the Raptors had two first-round picks, they drafted Chuck V and Joey Graham, passing twice on Danny Granger.
12:23pm - 26 Jun 14
Eric Koreen
As I said before, passing on Granger is not like passing on Iguodala, Granger did have a nice career, however, at the time of the draft, there were questions about his knees.
dagger wrote:RaptorsFTL wrote:Double Helix wrote:If I'm not mistaken though, this move would severely limit our ability to overpay Lowry while also paying Grevis and Patman would they're likely to command.
In other words, if this deal goes down I think it means Masai is holding firm on paying Lowry no more than 11-12 mill tops and/or expects to let one of Patman or Grevis walk.
I would think you let Vasquez go.
No it wouldn't. At the start of free agency, including full salaries for Hanbrough and Amir plus our draft picks, we stand to have about $45m in committed salary. The tax line will be about $76m if I recall. What this trade would preclude is using cap space. We would have about $30-31m in money to spend below the tax line. If Lowry gets $12m, and we add Prince's salary net of Salmon's $1m guarantee, we'd still have about $10-12m for Patman and/or Vasquez before hitting the tax. If we draft a point guard, Vasquez probably walks. If we draft a PF, we might waive Hansbrough and open up a bit of room to use part or all of the MLE.
