ImageImageImageImageImage

Shams: KAT to the Knicks

Moderators: Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100

Raptors Realtor
Analyst
Posts: 3,488
And1: 3,402
Joined: Jul 16, 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#221 » by Raptors Realtor » Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:54 am

kalel123 wrote:
Raptors Realtor wrote:
kalel123 wrote:
Correct, you are. And those picks ended up being 19th pick in 2024, projected to be one of the worst draft in years! Late pick in 2024 that ended up being Isiah Collier, projected #1 pick at one point, for UTAH f'ing JAZZ! And we got Agbaji AND re-signed Olynyk both of whom bombed like none other during summer plays. And last-but-certain-to-be-the-least... A mystery mid-to-low pick in 2026!

Did I mention Ja'Kobe Walter is now injured alongside Bruce Brown? Both of them come from the great Siakam tree, the garbage that keeps on giving~!

What great returns they are. So worthless.


Uh I was just correcting the other poster who stated we only got Brown for Siakam... Secondly, we don't know what Walter will turn out to be in the future, too early, and who cares if he's injured now, that has zero impact on whatever future value a rookie has. Also, there's no idea to know what we'll get with the Pacers '26 pick. I'm not saying the immediate value was great, but based on the rumors nobody was offering anything better, would you have preferred the hawks offer of Hunter, Griffin & a 1st, or how about Sac's offer of Barnes, Huerter & a 1st?


And I'm merely correcting you that adding the POS worthless picks, don't matter how many, doesn't make the return any better when chances are, Bruce Brown could very well be the best player when all's said and done. You can throw "oh you never know" BS as many times as you want, doesn't change the fact Ja'Kobe Walter's most likely projected path is as a middling role player. That's how things normally go for most 19th picks in any draft (i.e. if they stick at all) let alone one of the worse drafts that he's a part of. And that '26 Indiana pick? Would need some type of special dumb **** to not realize that's most likely going to be another 19th-ish pick waiting to happen barring disastrous injuries to some of Indiana's players seeing as how they retained Siakam and didn't lose any of their young prospects in the process of acquiring him. We really need to stop insulting each other's intelligence and get real about that pick. There's a very good reason Indiana was willing to give that up over any of their young propsects worth a damn.

I don't know if anybody was offering anything better and neither do you (last I checked, Randle/KAT trade never showed up on any rumor mill so don't need to be genius to figure the rumors aren't necessarily all it's cracked up to be). But even if that were true, that's because they decided to wait to the last minute to deal Siakam when his value was at its lowest. Should've dealt him a year earlier when it was crystal clear that flawed core was going nowhere fast instead of doubling down on it with Poeltl by mortgaging the future. Or even during the offseason. Logic and past/present examples (RANDLE) dictate: at that point, they would've gotten more value back and doesn't take much to be better than the garbage we got. But alas, they are delusional and slow to act until reality hits them right in the face and then some, which explains why Bruce Brown is still here deciding to heal on company time.


I've read enough of your posts on here to know your whole shtick is to bitch and complain about the players, the front office, talk sh*t and troll posters... So I'm not gonna get roped into a lengthy back and forth with you over your baseless, speculative and incoherent arguments.

What I will say is that we can't debate your hopes and dreams of what we should've gotten, and that the front office must have passed on a better deal (according to you), we can only debate what has been reported and those 2 trades I stated we're the only ones widely reported in the media.
User avatar
ForeverTFC
RealGM
Posts: 17,581
And1: 19,109
Joined: Dec 07, 2004
         

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#222 » by ForeverTFC » Mon Sep 30, 2024 4:41 am

Scase wrote:
ForeverTFC wrote:
Scase wrote:Randle my guy, Randle.

Him and Siakam are borderline the same player, both on expirings. Randle in no way is picking up that option, he is an expiring in every sense.


It’s so obvious that you don’t watch the league or read anything. You realize a sizable portion of pundits think Minny won this deal right?

So clueless yet so confident. Its honestly bizarre.

Do you really need to be a dick to have a discussion? Pundits can think what they want, doesn't make me clueless because I'm capable of holding my own opinion instead of just regurgitating what others say.

Minny got worse, but they got off of a pending huge contract. The Knicks became a more serious contender. Winner or loser is purely perspective based. All those pundits said the JB contract was stupid and an overpay, but a few of us used our brains and realized that championship contention windows are small and sometimes you have to go all in.

The knicks are doing just that, maybe it works out, maybe it doesn't, but they gotta shoot their shot.


Yes, because it’s impossible to have any level headed discussion with you. And at the rate that you spam threads, it’s impossible not to engage.

RGM GB puts Siakam ahead of Randle and KAT and you hand wave it away. Pundits of varying backgrounds: Bontemps (classic beat guy), Pelton (analytics guy), Marks (former GM in the NBA) say Minny won the deal and you have wave it away.

And what’s your justification for your claim that KAT is a tier above Randle and Siakam? That he shoots 3s? Because someone already showed you stats over the last 2 season and you very predictably didn’t engage.

Tell me, what is it about KAT that has you excited about his move to the Knicks beside his 3 point shooting? How do you think he’ll work in Thibs’ defense? Do you think Thibs has to adjust? How do you feel about the fact that 2 of their starting 5 and 3 of their 7 best players can’t play majority of the season? Does it concern you about their depth? What exactly is it that makes it such a no brainer for you that the Knicks got better and Minny got worse, other than “KAT shoots 3s” and “Randle is like Siakam”? Any specific games you recall last year that you think would be a good example to cite? You’re so convinced that it’s so clear, please go ahead and make your case.

All you do is spam threads, act like everything you say is a known fact and any view against yours is borderline stupid. It’s so tiring. This trade is a lot closer than you think. Minny maximized the return they could get for KAT. Knicks took a massive swing. This is such an intriguing trade to discuss. I was looking forward to coming here and getting folks’ view and seeing some analysis yet you turn the thread into **** with your participation once again.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,404
And1: 10,596
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#223 » by Scase » Mon Sep 30, 2024 4:56 am

ForeverTFC wrote:act like everything you say is a known fact and any view against yours is borderline stupid.


ForeverTFC wrote:So clueless yet so confident. Its honestly bizarre.


Loving the irony.

Don't like my posts, put me on foes and don't engage. I'm able to do it with others, and you can too. It's easier than name calling people.

Last I'll be bothering with your posts moving forward, have a good one.
Image
Props TZ!
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,404
And1: 10,596
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#224 » by Scase » Mon Sep 30, 2024 5:13 am

XTC wrote:
Scase wrote:
ForeverTFC wrote:
Eh, I guess subjective. Neither KAT or Randle make the RealGM top 30 while Siakam has been a mainstay. I want to be clear that I think both are below Siakam and consensus on this forum (on the GB) agrees with me.

With that said, DDV wanting out is irrlevant. OG also wanted out. Point remains that KAT has a claim for the worst contract in the league. In my opinion, our return was “better”.

With that said, I will again say that I think Siakam is a more valuable player than both and therefore I still think we should have gotten more for Siakam.

The real GM top 30 means quite literally nothing lol. This entire forum is dominated by the Raps board, so that is unsurprising. Personally, I think KAT is a tier above both Randle/Siakam whom of which I consider to be the same level of player, but I can understand different people value different skills.

But ultimately we are in agreement, that our return was not very good and should have been better.

KAT definitely peaked higher than Pascal, but he's been on the down swing for awhile now.

The past two seasons here are their stats. For fun let's add Randle into the mix aswell.

KAT
21.4/8.3/3.9/0.7/0.6
50.1/39.9/87.4
TS 63.1%
PER 18.8
BPM 2.7

Pascal
22.9/7.4/5.0/0.8/0.4
50.7/33.4/75.5
TS 58.3%
PER 20.0
BPM 2.5

Randle
24.7/9.7/4.4/0.6/0.3
46.4/33.4/76.6
TS 57.7%
PER 19.8
BPM 3.0

Like I said KAT definitely peaked higher when he was younger, but his play has been on the downswing for awhile, and Pascal/Randle have been out producing him the last couple years. KAT's value is his shooting, and his ability to play the 5, but I'm not so sure he's better than either player at the moment. I do think he's a better fit on the Knicks just because they lack shooting, and KAT has shown the ability to play the 5.



KAT is putting up similar/slightly better numbers than Siakam....on a downswing and that's the argument for him being worse? Not sure I follow the logic. Siakam is wildly less efficient despite playing closer to the basket, and last year was his most efficient year since the chip, and the gap is still a massive 5% TS%. If KAT is on a downswing, and matching or slightly beating out Siakams best year since 18-19, that doesn't exactly say "same level player" to me.

And Randle is cut from the same cloth, except he's a better rebounder than both.

The only knock against KAT is his contract, and that is an absolutely legitimate knock on his value. The biggest differentiating factor Siakam would have had an argument for, was his defence. But that has been mediocre to downright bad for years, so even that isn't a fair argument.

I'm not saying Siakam or Randle are trash and KAT is some elite top tier player, simply that based on general play, and the fact that he commanded more in a trade, it's fair to assume he’s a more valuable/better player. The AAV difference is like 7.5mil we aren't talking a 40 vs 60 difference.

KAT is an incredible 3pt shooting centre, they always have a premium attached due to how rare that is. It's not his fault he was good enough to qualify for a supermax and Siakam wasn't, that alone says enough. If the MIN ownership wasn't afraid of the cap changes, they wouldn't have let him go for a second.
Image
Props TZ!
User avatar
WaltFrazier
RealGM
Posts: 32,964
And1: 30,711
Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
       

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#225 » by WaltFrazier » Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:09 pm

Read on Twitter
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
User avatar
JShuttlesworth
RealGM
Posts: 10,128
And1: 13,285
Joined: Dec 09, 2013
Location: Toronto
 

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#226 » by JShuttlesworth » Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:11 pm

I don't really understand what the TWolves are doing from a forward looking strategy perspective.

In July of 2022, they go "all-in" for Rudy Gobert, trading 4 FRP's (2023, 2025, 2027, and 2029) and a swap (2026), but just two short years later they break it up for financial reasons. Remind me, what was they point of trading away all those picks again? What did they think they were going to accomplish in 2-years that made that trade worthwhile?

Their draft pick situation looks awful. According to Fanspo, they don't have their own 1st Rounder again until 2028. But it gets worse, they don't own their 2029, 2030 (SAS Swap), or 2031 FRP's either. It's just a total disaster for them moving forward.

Both Randle and Gobert have player options for the 2025/26 season. I'm going to assume that Randle opts out and skips town as fast as possible. Rudy opts-in, he won't walk away from that $46.5 million, will he? I doubt he re-signs after though. So the Wolves will end up losing Randle in 2025, and Rudy + Conley in 2026 -- and replacing these guys with 2nd Round picks.

Minnesota isn't a Free Agent destination either...I just don't understand what they're trying to accomplish
TheGeneral99
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,061
And1: 5,363
Joined: Mar 11, 2023
   

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#227 » by TheGeneral99 » Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:18 pm

This is a great trade for the Knicks.

They proved last year they didn't need Randle to be a great team in the East, especially if OG is healthy.

Now they add one of the best offensive bigs in the game.

Brunson and KAT will be one of the most lethal pick and roll duo's for many years.
User avatar
WaltFrazier
RealGM
Posts: 32,964
And1: 30,711
Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
       

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#228 » by WaltFrazier » Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:32 pm

KATs defense better than ppl think, good breakdown here

There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 35,313
And1: 66,925
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#229 » by OakleyDokely » Mon Sep 30, 2024 1:46 pm

The big issue has always been KAT defensively at the 5 and he isn't exactly a high bball IQ guy. NY is probably one of the better spots for him though because they have elite defenders allover the court and OG is capable of guarding up.

The interesting question is how he handles the pressure because there will be a lot of pressure when you're making 50-60 million a year, especially in the NY market. Not to mention, he didn't exactly gel with Thibs the first time around.

The Knicks went all-in. They traded their haul of picks, they have guys on huge deals that will be hard to move if they underachieve and they aren't particularly young as most of their core is in their late 20s. Their time is now.
User avatar
bluerap23
Head Coach
Posts: 6,904
And1: 7,086
Joined: Aug 15, 2012
   

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#230 » by bluerap23 » Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:21 pm

DreamTeam09 wrote:
bluerap23 wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:Ant and Randle won't work. That's a terrible trade by Minny imo.


this has little to do with Randle. I wouldn't be surprised if he is made 6th man on that team. Reid fits better than Kat on a defence first team. Don't expect to see Randle on the floor with Gobert very often.

I might be in the minority but I think both teams win this trade.


Naz
Randle
McDaniels
Ant
Donte

To close games. Still leaves Ant in a position to make decisions & plays for himself n others.

Leaves you to think why they didn't just go get Ingram + Alverado or something. Maybe they'd didn't want Kat in the west still, maybe they like Randle


This is better for them than a straight Towns for Ingram deal. Not sure what else would have been in the deal. Ingrams stock is so low right now someone should go after him.
Image
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 35,313
And1: 66,925
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#231 » by OakleyDokely » Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:42 pm

DiVincenzo is the key for Minny. He had a low key great year.

30 mins a game, 15/4/3/1 on shooting splits of 44/40/75 and TS% close to 60. And he was a big minute guy on the Knicks playoff run.

He's on a great deal as well, signed for 3 more years at only 11-12 mill a year.

Randle is probably only a rental for them, and might even be flipped again during the season if the team underachieves or he doesn't complement Gobert.
User avatar
720
RealGM
Posts: 33,036
And1: 67,611
Joined: Nov 01, 2012
Location: Malton
     

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#232 » by 720 » Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:47 pm

This raises their ceiling somewhat. But I still don’t think they’re better than the Celtics or the Bucks,
Image
Image
DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 16,990
And1: 10,327
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#233 » by DreamTeam09 » Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:53 pm

OakleyDokely wrote:DiVincenzo is the key for Minny. He had a low key great year.

30 mins a game, 15/4/3/1 on shooting splits of 44/40/75 and TS% close to 60. And he was a big minute guy on the Knicks playoff run.

He's on a great deal as well, signed for 3 more years at only 11-12 mill a year.

Randle is probably only a rental for them, and might even be flipped again during the season if the team underachieves or he doesn't complement Gobert.


Randle won't be a rental, I believe he was targeted and has a relationship with Finch. I think he'll pick up his option cuz the teams with cap space aren't going to be giving it to Julius.
There's going to to be a moratorium on spending until the cap jumps up a little. Bobby marks said expect the next two summers to be chill.

Randle will probably pick up option & extend off of that, or resign on a 3yr 100 deal.
Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust
User avatar
OakleyDokely
RealGM
Posts: 35,313
And1: 66,925
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: 416
 

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#234 » by OakleyDokely » Mon Sep 30, 2024 2:57 pm

DreamTeam09 wrote:
OakleyDokely wrote:DiVincenzo is the key for Minny. He had a low key great year.

30 mins a game, 15/4/3/1 on shooting splits of 44/40/75 and TS% close to 60. And he was a big minute guy on the Knicks playoff run.

He's on a great deal as well, signed for 3 more years at only 11-12 mill a year.

Randle is probably only a rental for them, and might even be flipped again during the season if the team underachieves or he doesn't complement Gobert.


Randle won't be a rental, I believe he was targeted and has a relationship with Finch. I think he'll pick up his option cuz the teams with cap space aren't going to be giving it to Julius.
There's going to to be a moratorium on spending until the cap jumps up a little. Bobby marks said expect the next two summers to be chill.

Randle will probably pick up option & extend off of that, or resign on a 3yr 100 deal.


I think it will depend on how his season goes. The FA class looks very light. Maybe he doesn't get a 30 mill average, but if he can get something like 3/75 or 2/50 like Tobias got, he might opt for that type of security.
kalel123
Head Coach
Posts: 6,170
And1: 4,571
Joined: Oct 19, 2004

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#235 » by kalel123 » Mon Sep 30, 2024 3:02 pm

Raptors Realtor wrote:
kalel123 wrote:
Raptors Realtor wrote:
Uh I was just correcting the other poster who stated we only got Brown for Siakam... Secondly, we don't know what Walter will turn out to be in the future, too early, and who cares if he's injured now, that has zero impact on whatever future value a rookie has. Also, there's no idea to know what we'll get with the Pacers '26 pick. I'm not saying the immediate value was great, but based on the rumors nobody was offering anything better, would you have preferred the hawks offer of Hunter, Griffin & a 1st, or how about Sac's offer of Barnes, Huerter & a 1st?


And I'm merely correcting you that adding the POS worthless picks, don't matter how many, doesn't make the return any better when chances are, Bruce Brown could very well be the best player when all's said and done. You can throw "oh you never know" BS as many times as you want, doesn't change the fact Ja'Kobe Walter's most likely projected path is as a middling role player. That's how things normally go for most 19th picks in any draft (i.e. if they stick at all) let alone one of the worse drafts that he's a part of. And that '26 Indiana pick? Would need some type of special dumb **** to not realize that's most likely going to be another 19th-ish pick waiting to happen barring disastrous injuries to some of Indiana's players seeing as how they retained Siakam and didn't lose any of their young prospects in the process of acquiring him. We really need to stop insulting each other's intelligence and get real about that pick. There's a very good reason Indiana was willing to give that up over any of their young propsects worth a damn.

I don't know if anybody was offering anything better and neither do you (last I checked, Randle/KAT trade never showed up on any rumor mill so don't need to be genius to figure the rumors aren't necessarily all it's cracked up to be). But even if that were true, that's because they decided to wait to the last minute to deal Siakam when his value was at its lowest. Should've dealt him a year earlier when it was crystal clear that flawed core was going nowhere fast instead of doubling down on it with Poeltl by mortgaging the future. Or even during the offseason. Logic and past/present examples (RANDLE) dictate: at that point, they would've gotten more value back and doesn't take much to be better than the garbage we got. But alas, they are delusional and slow to act until reality hits them right in the face and then some, which explains why Bruce Brown is still here deciding to heal on company time.


I've read enough of your posts on here to know your whole shtick is to bitch and complain about the players, the front office, talk sh*t and troll posters... So I'm not gonna get roped into a lengthy back and forth with you over your baseless, speculative and incoherent arguments.

What I will say is that we can't debate your hopes and dreams of what we should've gotten, and that the front office must have passed on a better deal (according to you), we can only debate what has been reported and those 2 trades I stated we're the only ones widely reported in the media.



Taking the cheap way out, huh? Well, bye.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,404
And1: 10,596
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#236 » by Scase » Mon Sep 30, 2024 4:08 pm

bluerap23 wrote:
DreamTeam09 wrote:
bluerap23 wrote:
this has little to do with Randle. I wouldn't be surprised if he is made 6th man on that team. Reid fits better than Kat on a defence first team. Don't expect to see Randle on the floor with Gobert very often.

I might be in the minority but I think both teams win this trade.


Naz
Randle
McDaniels
Ant
Donte

To close games. Still leaves Ant in a position to make decisions & plays for himself n others.

Leaves you to think why they didn't just go get Ingram + Alverado or something. Maybe they'd didn't want Kat in the west still, maybe they like Randle


This is better for them than a straight Towns for Ingram deal. Not sure what else would have been in the deal. Ingrams stock is so low right now someone should go after him.

The problem with Ingram isn't the cost to acquire him, but rather the rumoured expectations he/his agent have for his next contract. For some delusional reason he thinks he should be making 50mil/yr. No team should ever even consider that level of contract for his performance + health issues. And I can't think of any team that would be willing or able to send out 30-35mil worth in salary + assets to acquire a guy they won't want to pay that much, and ends up being a massive flight risk since he's a UFA.

I mean maybe DET does it so they can stop being a horrible 20ish win team, it's a terrible long term plan, but it is DET after all, so I wouldn't be surprised. Otherwise I don't see any reason any teams that are looking decent make that move. He's like a moderately worse version of Siakam with WAY worse injury history, and only a couple years younger. If Siakam wasn't getting that level of contract, there is no way in hell Ingram should.

As for MIN, this just screams pure cost cutting. DDV will help spread the floor with KAT gone, but he's still not a starter so he's not gonna be jacking up 9, 3PA or anything like he was in NYC. I know some folks think they re-sign Randle, and from an asset perspective they probably do/will. It always felt like Naz was going to be the guy to move up in the rotation with KAT gone, but with Randle there I'm not sure how that works.

I also wonder how this all affects NAW. DDV should be above him if the goal is to win, so do they keep him, or try and flip/combine him into something else since they are pretty thin at the 3 spot.
Image
Props TZ!
User avatar
ontnut
RealGM
Posts: 12,035
And1: 9,023
Joined: Jan 31, 2009
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#237 » by ontnut » Mon Sep 30, 2024 4:20 pm

JShuttlesworth wrote:I don't really understand what the TWolves are doing from a forward looking strategy perspective.

In July of 2022, they go "all-in" for Rudy Gobert, trading 4 FRP's (2023, 2025, 2027, and 2029) and a swap (2026), but just two short years later they break it up for financial reasons. Remind me, what was they point of trading away all those picks again? What did they think they were going to accomplish in 2-years that made that trade worthwhile?

Their draft pick situation looks awful. According to Fanspo, they don't have their own 1st Rounder again until 2028. But it gets worse, they don't own their 2029, 2030 (SAS Swap), or 2031 FRP's either. It's just a total disaster for them moving forward.

Both Randle and Gobert have player options for the 2025/26 season. I'm going to assume that Randle opts out and skips town as fast as possible. Rudy opts-in, he won't walk away from that $46.5 million, will he? I doubt he re-signs after though. So the Wolves will end up losing Randle in 2025, and Rudy + Conley in 2026 -- and replacing these guys with 2nd Round picks.

Minnesota isn't a Free Agent destination either...I just don't understand what they're trying to accomplish

Yeah, puzzling. It's not like they didn't see this cap crunch coming either. Their FO/Ownership is alllll over the place and that has pretty much always been the case though. There's rumours than Glen Taylor saw that A-rod et al were going to cut payroll and duck the 2nd apron after buying the team, so he reneged on the deal and just did it himself lol. MIN just can never get it right. They had KG, did nothing to surround him. K Love? Nothing. Couldn't develop Wiggins. Traded Lavine and Markkanen for Jimmy, and then he immediately bolted because of their sh*t culture. Couldn't figure out how to surround Towns, until they massively overpaid for Gobert, then blow it up 2 years later. Now it's Ant-man's turn to be tossed into the fray as the undisputed #1. I mean, the amount of talent that has passed through MIN in the last decade or two is astonishing, with nothing to show for it until last year. And they immediately blow it up for money reasons. SMFH.
Image
will
RealGM
Posts: 52,083
And1: 50,740
Joined: Jan 08, 2006
Location: Pat's Homestyle Jamaican Restaurant. Shouts to Sheryl's Caribbean Cuisine
Contact:
         

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#238 » by will » Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:08 pm

Finally the TWolves can build around ANT.
DreamTeam09
RealGM
Posts: 16,990
And1: 10,327
Joined: Jan 06, 2009
Location: Scarborough
 

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#239 » by DreamTeam09 » Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:33 pm

Knicks out..

IQ/RJ/Randle/Donte + 6 1st + 2 2nds + 1 pick swap
For
OG/Mikal/Precious/Towns
Image

In Raptor Ball I Trust
djsunyc
RealGM
Posts: 98,533
And1: 72,334
Joined: Dec 28, 2003

Re: Shams: KAT to the Knicks 

Post#240 » by djsunyc » Mon Sep 30, 2024 7:37 pm

ontnut wrote:
JShuttlesworth wrote:I don't really understand what the TWolves are doing from a forward looking strategy perspective.

In July of 2022, they go "all-in" for Rudy Gobert, trading 4 FRP's (2023, 2025, 2027, and 2029) and a swap (2026), but just two short years later they break it up for financial reasons. Remind me, what was they point of trading away all those picks again? What did they think they were going to accomplish in 2-years that made that trade worthwhile?

Their draft pick situation looks awful. According to Fanspo, they don't have their own 1st Rounder again until 2028. But it gets worse, they don't own their 2029, 2030 (SAS Swap), or 2031 FRP's either. It's just a total disaster for them moving forward.

Both Randle and Gobert have player options for the 2025/26 season. I'm going to assume that Randle opts out and skips town as fast as possible. Rudy opts-in, he won't walk away from that $46.5 million, will he? I doubt he re-signs after though. So the Wolves will end up losing Randle in 2025, and Rudy + Conley in 2026 -- and replacing these guys with 2nd Round picks.

Minnesota isn't a Free Agent destination either...I just don't understand what they're trying to accomplish

Yeah, puzzling. It's not like they didn't see this cap crunch coming either. Their FO/Ownership is alllll over the place and that has pretty much always been the case though. There's rumours than Glen Taylor saw that A-rod et al were going to cut payroll and duck the 2nd apron after buying the team, so he reneged on the deal and just did it himself lol. MIN just can never get it right. They had KG, did nothing to surround him. K Love? Nothing. Couldn't develop Wiggins. Traded Lavine and Markkanen for Jimmy, and then he immediately bolted because of their sh*t culture. Couldn't figure out how to surround Towns, until they massively overpaid for Gobert, then blow it up 2 years later. Now it's Ant-man's turn to be tossed into the fray as the undisputed #1. I mean, the amount of talent that has passed through MIN in the last decade or two is astonishing, with nothing to show for it until last year. And they immediately blow it up for money reasons. SMFH.


i think denver wanted to change their identity to a defensive one and went out and got the premiere defensive big in the league. it cost them alot but it got them to the conference finals beating the defending champs so in that respect, it worked.

ownership, etc played a part but basketball wise, i think they saw the team and figured ant is young enough that they can try and win now (even if they may not have enough for a chip) while having deals ending around 2026 to re-tool the roster around him again.

Return to Toronto Raptors