Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Psubs wrote:mademan wrote:Im all in on Tyrell Terry. Trade up for him if we must. If the dude gets a little stronger, he's a star
He looks like the 6'2 PG version of Reggie Miller.
HeadtopChunes wrote:Psubs wrote:mademan wrote:Im all in on Tyrell Terry. Trade up for him if we must. If the dude gets a little stronger, he's a star
He looks like the 6'2 PG version of Reggie Miller.
Seen multiple sources say he grew an inch over quarantine so 6’3 now!
pr0gr4m wrote:HeadtopChunes wrote:Psubs wrote:
He looks like the 6'2 PG version of Reggie Miller.
Seen multiple sources say he grew an inch over quarantine so 6’3 now!
He isn't within reach this is a weird draft as the season was cancelled. I would personally not go for him as his size will cause defensive issues down the road.
I like Reed and Woodard, they are long and have strong shooting potential. I could see Woodard developing well with the 905. Woodard's length and explosive shot blocking would be useful with small ball, he is also a good rebounder at the SF spot.
Reed
Siakam
OG
Woodard
FVV
This would be the perfect "small" line up with strong shooting, transition scorers, and half court mismatch opportunities. In a few years I can see Reed, OG, and Woodard being strong pick and roll handlers AND rollers.
pr0gr4m wrote:HeadtopChunes wrote:Psubs wrote:
He looks like the 6'2 PG version of Reggie Miller.
Seen multiple sources say he grew an inch over quarantine so 6’3 now!
He isn't within reach this is a weird draft as the season was cancelled. I would personally not go for him as his size will cause defensive issues down the road.
I like Reed and Woodard, they are long and have strong shooting potential. I could see Woodard developing well with the 905. Woodard's length and explosive shot blocking would be useful with small ball, he is also a good rebounder at the SF spot.
Reed
Siakam
OG
Woodard
FVV
This would be the perfect "small" line up with strong shooting, transition scorers, and half court mismatch opportunities. In a few years I can see Reed, OG, and Woodard being strong pick and roll handlers AND rollers.
Psubs wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:HeadtopChunes wrote:
Seen multiple sources say he grew an inch over quarantine so 6’3 now!
He isn't within reach this is a weird draft as the season was cancelled. I would personally not go for him as his size will cause defensive issues down the road.
I like Reed and Woodard, they are long and have strong shooting potential. I could see Woodard developing well with the 905. Woodard's length and explosive shot blocking would be useful with small ball, he is also a good rebounder at the SF spot.
Reed
Siakam
OG
Woodard
FVV
This would be the perfect "small" line up with strong shooting, transition scorers, and half court mismatch opportunities. In a few years I can see Reed, OG, and Woodard being strong pick and roll handlers AND rollers.
I don't think Woodard drops to #59 but who knows.
pr0gr4m wrote:Psubs wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:He isn't within reach this is a weird draft as the season was cancelled. I would personally not go for him as his size will cause defensive issues down the road.
I like Reed and Woodard, they are long and have strong shooting potential. I could see Woodard developing well with the 905. Woodard's length and explosive shot blocking would be useful with small ball, he is also a good rebounder at the SF spot.
Reed
Siakam
OG
Woodard
FVV
This would be the perfect "small" line up with strong shooting, transition scorers, and half court mismatch opportunities. In a few years I can see Reed, OG, and Woodard being strong pick and roll handlers AND rollers.
I don't think Woodard drops to #59 but who knows.
I would take Woodard with the first rounder to have him cheap long term. I see him being a contributor as soon as 1 season in. I can see him doing well in our developmental system.
The jump he took from his first to second year show he puts in work he went from shooting 27% from 3 to 43% in one season.
I think Paul Reed will drop to 59th if not him then Tillman. I would prefer Reed with his ability to switch 1-5 and also stretch the floor. He can push the ball up the floor similar to Siakam and can eventually develop with OG and Woodard to develop a handle.
Mark_83 wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:HeadtopChunes wrote:
Seen multiple sources say he grew an inch over quarantine so 6’3 now!
He isn't within reach this is a weird draft as the season was cancelled. I would personally not go for him as his size will cause defensive issues down the road.
I like Reed and Woodard, they are long and have strong shooting potential. I could see Woodard developing well with the 905. Woodard's length and explosive shot blocking would be useful with small ball, he is also a good rebounder at the SF spot.
Reed
Siakam
OG
Woodard
FVV
This would be the perfect "small" line up with strong shooting, transition scorers, and half court mismatch opportunities. In a few years I can see Reed, OG, and Woodard being strong pick and roll handlers AND rollers.
Big fan of Woodard. He has the size, length, strength, and athleticism to guard 1 through 4.
His measurements are comparable to OG, except he has more vertical hops.
OG: 6'7 232lbs 7'2 wingspan
RW: 6'7 230lbs 7'1 wingspan
Would love to throw Woodard out there on defense against a guy like Jaylen Brown.
Dalek wrote:Mark_83 wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:He isn't within reach this is a weird draft as the season was cancelled. I would personally not go for him as his size will cause defensive issues down the road.
I like Reed and Woodard, they are long and have strong shooting potential. I could see Woodard developing well with the 905. Woodard's length and explosive shot blocking would be useful with small ball, he is also a good rebounder at the SF spot.
Reed
Siakam
OG
Woodard
FVV
This would be the perfect "small" line up with strong shooting, transition scorers, and half court mismatch opportunities. In a few years I can see Reed, OG, and Woodard being strong pick and roll handlers AND rollers.
Big fan of Woodard. He has the size, length, strength, and athleticism to guard 1 through 4.
His measurements are comparable to OG, except he has more vertical hops.
OG: 6'7 232lbs 7'2 wingspan
RW: 6'7 230lbs 7'1 wingspan
Would love to throw Woodard out there on defense against a guy like Jaylen Brown.
Interesting comparison between Woodward and OG. I am not a fan of Woodward's shot, as he only made a low volume of threes but he looks pretty tough and should offer some ability to guard 3s and 4s.
I would like for Toronto to have a floor spreader, preferably someone who can shoot off movement, but adding some size and shooting along with defensive switchability is a good bet.
Jordan Nwora could be that guy. Reminds me a bit of Duncan Robinson, a shooter with size at 6'8", and he hit 153 threes through 65 games over his final two college seasons. He is more of a catch and shoot guy, but he hit over 40% which is good on that kind of volume. His wingspan is mediocre at 6'10" and he is not a freak athlete, but he is a pretty sound defender and can handle a bit. He rebounds decently as well.Spoiler:
On a side note, Nwora played for Nigeria and against Canada in an exhibition leading all scorers in the game last year.
Raptors_128 wrote:Is there any way we can trade up to acquire Killian Hayes with some combination of Norm/29th/TD/Thomas/McCaw/2021 1st?
Am I wrong to think he can be our PG of the future?
pr0gr4m wrote:Psubs wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:He isn't within reach this is a weird draft as the season was cancelled. I would personally not go for him as his size will cause defensive issues down the road.
I like Reed and Woodard, they are long and have strong shooting potential. I could see Woodard developing well with the 905. Woodard's length and explosive shot blocking would be useful with small ball, he is also a good rebounder at the SF spot.
Reed
Siakam
OG
Woodard
FVV
This would be the perfect "small" line up with strong shooting, transition scorers, and half court mismatch opportunities. In a few years I can see Reed, OG, and Woodard being strong pick and roll handlers AND rollers.
I don't think Woodard drops to #59 but who knows.
I would take Woodard with the first rounder to have him cheap long term. I see him being a contributor as soon as 1 season in. I can see him doing well in our developmental system.
The jump he took from his first to second year show he puts in work he went from shooting 27% from 3 to 43% in one season.
I think Paul Reed will drop to 59th if not him then Tillman. I would prefer Reed with his ability to switch 1-5 and also stretch the floor. He can push the ball up the floor similar to Siakam and can eventually develop with OG and Woodard to develop a handle.
Dalek wrote:Mark_83 wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:He isn't within reach this is a weird draft as the season was cancelled. I would personally not go for him as his size will cause defensive issues down the road.
I like Reed and Woodard, they are long and have strong shooting potential. I could see Woodard developing well with the 905. Woodard's length and explosive shot blocking would be useful with small ball, he is also a good rebounder at the SF spot.
Reed
Siakam
OG
Woodard
FVV
This would be the perfect "small" line up with strong shooting, transition scorers, and half court mismatch opportunities. In a few years I can see Reed, OG, and Woodard being strong pick and roll handlers AND rollers.
Big fan of Woodard. He has the size, length, strength, and athleticism to guard 1 through 4.
His measurements are comparable to OG, except he has more vertical hops.
OG: 6'7 232lbs 7'2 wingspan
RW: 6'7 230lbs 7'1 wingspan
Would love to throw Woodard out there on defense against a guy like Jaylen Brown.
Interesting comparison between Woodward and OG. I am not a fan of Woodward's shot, as he only made a low volume of threes but he looks pretty tough and should offer some ability to guard 3s and 4s.
I would like for Toronto to have a floor spreader, preferably someone who can shoot off movement, but adding some size and shooting along with defensive switchability is a good bet.
Jordan Nwora could be that guy. Reminds me a bit of Duncan Robinson, a shooter with size at 6'8", and he hit 153 threes through 65 games over his final two college seasons. He is more of a catch and shoot guy, but he hit over 40% which is good on that kind of volume. His wingspan is mediocre at 6'10" and he is not a freak athlete, but he is a pretty sound defender and can handle a bit. He rebounds decently as well.Spoiler:
On a side note, Nwora played for Nigeria and against Canada in an exhibition leading all scorers in the game last year.
Indeed wrote:Dalek wrote:Mark_83 wrote:Big fan of Woodard. He has the size, length, strength, and athleticism to guard 1 through 4.
His measurements are comparable to OG, except he has more vertical hops.
OG: 6'7 232lbs 7'2 wingspan
RW: 6'7 230lbs 7'1 wingspan
Would love to throw Woodard out there on defense against a guy like Jaylen Brown.
Interesting comparison between Woodward and OG. I am not a fan of Woodward's shot, as he only made a low volume of threes but he looks pretty tough and should offer some ability to guard 3s and 4s.
I would like for Toronto to have a floor spreader, preferably someone who can shoot off movement, but adding some size and shooting along with defensive switchability is a good bet.
Jordan Nwora could be that guy. Reminds me a bit of Duncan Robinson, a shooter with size at 6'8", and he hit 153 threes through 65 games over his final two college seasons. He is more of a catch and shoot guy, but he hit over 40% which is good on that kind of volume. His wingspan is mediocre at 6'10" and he is not a freak athlete, but he is a pretty sound defender and can handle a bit. He rebounds decently as well.Spoiler:
On a side note, Nwora played for Nigeria and against Canada in an exhibition leading all scorers in the game last year.
The difference between Woodard and OG are the quickness. OG has elite first step. Woodard may have trouble guarding elite PG, while OG may able to recover with his quickness.
As for Nwora, his defense would be a concern. He can be used as off the bench scorer if we based on the current minutes of player. It depends how we are going to build our team. Celtics built based on 3+D, they prefer players who can defend over scoring. Heat built based on offense, they prefer players who can shoot the ball.
Psubs wrote:Nwora may drop to #59.
Indeed wrote:pr0gr4m wrote:Psubs wrote:
I don't think Woodard drops to #59 but who knows.
I would take Woodard with the first rounder to have him cheap long term. I see him being a contributor as soon as 1 season in. I can see him doing well in our developmental system.
The jump he took from his first to second year show he puts in work he went from shooting 27% from 3 to 43% in one season.
I think Paul Reed will drop to 59th if not him then Tillman. I would prefer Reed with his ability to switch 1-5 and also stretch the floor. He can push the ball up the floor similar to Siakam and can eventually develop with OG and Woodard to develop a handle.
His 3 point shooting is a small sample size, so some scouting report question his 3 point shooting, particularly his free throw is not shooting very well.
Indeed wrote:Dalek wrote:Mark_83 wrote:Big fan of Woodard. He has the size, length, strength, and athleticism to guard 1 through 4.
His measurements are comparable to OG, except he has more vertical hops.
OG: 6'7 232lbs 7'2 wingspan
RW: 6'7 230lbs 7'1 wingspan
Would love to throw Woodard out there on defense against a guy like Jaylen Brown.
Interesting comparison between Woodward and OG. I am not a fan of Woodward's shot, as he only made a low volume of threes but he looks pretty tough and should offer some ability to guard 3s and 4s.
I would like for Toronto to have a floor spreader, preferably someone who can shoot off movement, but adding some size and shooting along with defensive switchability is a good bet.
Jordan Nwora could be that guy. Reminds me a bit of Duncan Robinson, a shooter with size at 6'8", and he hit 153 threes through 65 games over his final two college seasons. He is more of a catch and shoot guy, but he hit over 40% which is good on that kind of volume. His wingspan is mediocre at 6'10" and he is not a freak athlete, but he is a pretty sound defender and can handle a bit. He rebounds decently as well.Spoiler:
On a side note, Nwora played for Nigeria and against Canada in an exhibition leading all scorers in the game last year.
The difference between Woodard and OG are the quickness. OG has elite first step. Woodard may have trouble guarding elite PG, while OG may able to recover with his quickness.
As for Nwora, his defense would be a concern. He can be used as off the bench scorer if we based on the current minutes of player. It depends how we are going to build our team. Celtics built based on 3+D, they prefer players who can defend over scoring. Heat built based on offense, they prefer players who can shoot the ball.
Mark_83 wrote:Indeed wrote:Dalek wrote:
Interesting comparison between Woodward and OG. I am not a fan of Woodward's shot, as he only made a low volume of threes but he looks pretty tough and should offer some ability to guard 3s and 4s.
I would like for Toronto to have a floor spreader, preferably someone who can shoot off movement, but adding some size and shooting along with defensive switchability is a good bet.
Jordan Nwora could be that guy. Reminds me a bit of Duncan Robinson, a shooter with size at 6'8", and he hit 153 threes through 65 games over his final two college seasons. He is more of a catch and shoot guy, but he hit over 40% which is good on that kind of volume. His wingspan is mediocre at 6'10" and he is not a freak athlete, but he is a pretty sound defender and can handle a bit. He rebounds decently as well.Spoiler:
On a side note, Nwora played for Nigeria and against Canada in an exhibition leading all scorers in the game last year.
The difference between Woodard and OG are the quickness. OG has elite first step. Woodard may have trouble guarding elite PG, while OG may able to recover with his quickness.
As for Nwora, his defense would be a concern. He can be used as off the bench scorer if we based on the current minutes of player. It depends how we are going to build our team. Celtics built based on 3+D, they prefer players who can defend over scoring. Heat built based on offense, they prefer players who can shoot the ball.
I'm not sure about that. Woodard is pretty quick and athletic. What separates him more from OG at present is probably instincts.
I wouldn't want him guarding elite 1s over a long stretch but he's quick enough to stay in front of elite 2s and strong enough to bang with most modern day 4s in the post.
The only downside is, he's more of a wing than a 2 on offense. Unless one of them improves their handles we can't possibly play both OG and RW on the floor at the same time at the 2 and 3. He does have an underrated post game though that I think we could exploit against most 2s in the league.
