EH15 wrote:RaptorsFTL wrote:EH15 wrote:Calling it now. Nets pick won't even be top 5 unless they got lucky through the lottery.
They likely have the worst record in the NBA so at worst it's the 4th pick in the draft.
Zero chance if Lin and Russell are relatively healthy.
They were teetering on .500 when Lin was in the line up. They will be competitive enough to avoid being at the bottom. Atkinson is legit.
Lin
Russell
LeVert
RHJ
Crabbe
Really not bad considering how bare Billy King left the cupboards.
Here's the NBA depth charts for every team...
http://www.rotoworld.com/teams/depth-charts/nba.aspx
Say the 5 teams you think are worse than the Nets. The only two I'd accept the argument for are Atlanta and Indy. Every other team has at least something you can point to which gives them an advantage over the Nets. Orlando (continuity), New York (two stars), Sacramento (defense), Lakers (superstar youngsters and veteran additions), Philly (superstar youngsters and veteran additions), Phoenix, Utah, Detroit and Dallas all have WAY BETTER veteran talent right now.
Even your argument about the Nets with Lin last year doesn't hold up, given that they made significant changes to their rotation. Mozgov, Crabbe, Russell, Carroll are all new players. Lopez and others are out. So your after-February-with-Lin record doesn't matter given they're a new rotation that needs to build chemistry together.
It was an extremely valuable pick the Celtics gave up that currently projects as top 5, with about as good a chance as any for #1.