Raps in 4 wrote:Norm with the FVV stat line today

Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX
Raps in 4 wrote:Norm with the FVV stat line today

Los_29 wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Norm with the FVV stat line today
Minus the defense and assists then you might be onto something.
MoneyBall wrote:I know this is a Norm thread but I never thought I'd say we dodged a bullet by not re-signing Kawhi.

AkelaLoneWolf wrote:Los_29 wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Norm with the FVV stat line today
Minus the defense and assists then you might be onto something.
not sure why fred needs to be mentioned here...like i said, he lives rent free in two heads collectively.
bape_lovers wrote:B2b champs in the bubble had he just sign for a yearMoneyBall wrote:I know this is a Norm thread but I never thought I'd say we dodged a bullet by not re-signing Kawhi.
MoneyBall wrote:bape_lovers wrote:B2b champs in the bubble had he just sign for a yearMoneyBall wrote:I know this is a Norm thread but I never thought I'd say we dodged a bullet by not re-signing Kawhi.
If Kawhi had re-signed I doubt it would have been for the one season.
Ranger One wrote:lebron stopper wrote:Raptors_Dynasty wrote:I might be alone on this but imo if we allowed Norm the same opportunities as Pascal I think he'd be a much more potent offensive player (minus playmaking).
You're definitely not alone in thinking that. Frankly, given what Powell has showed over his career and particularly the last few years, I don't see how that should be a particularly controversial opinion either.
The Raptors FO had always clearly undervalued Powell every step of the way, to the point where they deluded themselves into thinking a random garden-variety chucker like Grent could easily replace what he does. It was a bad trade then and it's even worse now, not because the Raptors didn't keep him, but because the Raptors sold very low on him (without even realizing it) and then watched their cheap shiny new toy lose all of its luster within two years.
Of course, anyone like me who actually paid attention to Powell's entire career (down to even the teeny-tiny minutiae) knew that the idea of Powell being that easily replaceable was farcical. Not surprisingly, those who didn't figure it out back then are still spewing very bad takes when it comes to Powell - they don't know anything when it comes to him, and I doubt they ever will.
It was a cost cutting move plain and simple. Anyone thinking it had anything to do with age or potential or ceiling blah blah blah are idiots. The FO didnt want to pay powell what he was worth and thats all theres to it. They chose to pay Siakam and FVV instead, which as we all know was the WRONG choice.
mdenny wrote:Ranger One wrote:lebron stopper wrote:
You're definitely not alone in thinking that. Frankly, given what Powell has showed over his career and particularly the last few years, I don't see how that should be a particularly controversial opinion either.
The Raptors FO had always clearly undervalued Powell every step of the way, to the point where they deluded themselves into thinking a random garden-variety chucker like Grent could easily replace what he does. It was a bad trade then and it's even worse now, not because the Raptors didn't keep him, but because the Raptors sold very low on him (without even realizing it) and then watched their cheap shiny new toy lose all of its luster within two years.
Of course, anyone like me who actually paid attention to Powell's entire career (down to even the teeny-tiny minutiae) knew that the idea of Powell being that easily replaceable was farcical. Not surprisingly, those who didn't figure it out back then are still spewing very bad takes when it comes to Powell - they don't know anything when it comes to him, and I doubt they ever will.
It was a cost cutting move plain and simple. Anyone thinking it had anything to do with age or potential or ceiling blah blah blah are idiots. The FO didnt want to pay powell what he was worth and thats all theres to it. They chose to pay Siakam and FVV instead, which as we all know was the WRONG choice.
Does norm even make much more than trent? How was it a strictly cost-cutting move when he makes the same money as trent? If anything....Trent is the more expensive option because norm was looking to get locked in for multiple years while trent is hunting his first big payday.
We "all know" what? Norm is a quality 6th man who has since been traded for scraps. Pascal has been all nba and fred's been an allstar lol.
mdenny wrote:Ranger One wrote:lebron stopper wrote:
You're definitely not alone in thinking that. Frankly, given what Powell has showed over his career and particularly the last few years, I don't see how that should be a particularly controversial opinion either.
The Raptors FO had always clearly undervalued Powell every step of the way, to the point where they deluded themselves into thinking a random garden-variety chucker like Grent could easily replace what he does. It was a bad trade then and it's even worse now, not because the Raptors didn't keep him, but because the Raptors sold very low on him (without even realizing it) and then watched their cheap shiny new toy lose all of its luster within two years.
Of course, anyone like me who actually paid attention to Powell's entire career (down to even the teeny-tiny minutiae) knew that the idea of Powell being that easily replaceable was farcical. Not surprisingly, those who didn't figure it out back then are still spewing very bad takes when it comes to Powell - they don't know anything when it comes to him, and I doubt they ever will.
It was a cost cutting move plain and simple. Anyone thinking it had anything to do with age or potential or ceiling blah blah blah are idiots. The FO didnt want to pay powell what he was worth and thats all theres to it. They chose to pay Siakam and FVV instead, which as we all know was the WRONG choice.
Does norm even make much more than trent? How was it a strictly cost-cutting move when he makes the same money as trent? If anything....Trent is the more expensive option because norm was looking to get locked in for multiple years while trent is hunting his first big payday.
We "all know" what? Norm is a quality 6th man who has since been traded for scraps. Pascal has been all nba and fred's been an allstar lol.
mdenny wrote:In anycase....Masai is probably gonna make Fred the first active player/head coach in franchise history now that Nurse is out of the way. That's been the plan all along.
Van_Trump wrote:Remind me why the Trailblazers traded Norman

ItsDanger wrote:27 pts tonight. Trent? Shopping for a new poncho.
AkelaLoneWolf wrote:ItsDanger wrote:27 pts tonight. Trent? Shopping for a new poncho.
also allowed booker to score 47 points on him.
having said that, norm has handled himself well during these playoffs. but the catch22 is there. play him too many minutes he'll score you points but be a defensive liability and the team will lose.
he's a good role player but the more you play him the worse his impact becomes. he's best suited in his current role as off the bench player.
it will be interesting to see the changes that the clippers make this offseason. he might get a bigger role if one of PG or Kawhi are traded.