Merit wrote:YogurtProducer wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:
I'm fine with that. This year's FRP is the only one I'd be willing to part with since it'll be a mediocre one. If this trade doesn't work out (and it probably won't), it allows us to pivot to a tank or trade for an actual, reliable difference-maker since we'd have all of our future picks.
Yeah this is true. Plus I think in 2 years AD as an expiring would actually have some suitors and you could re-coup 75% of what you gave up.
I mean... **** it? If it absolutely blows up in your face you just trade everyone in 2027 and blow it sky high. Rebuild with whatever picks and prospects you get for IQ / Scottie / AD / Ingram
I wouldn't LOVE doing that deal, but I could live with it as i guess theoretically, if it all goes well, you are a finals team.
If we’re moving RJ and Jak and a first, we better be getting back someone better than Tony Bradley as a secondary piece. The Indy/Gafford trade can happen without the Raps and AD.
I guess I’m just not sure that AD puts us over the top. Also, trading RJ and Jak is similar to trading Demar in terms of sadness for me.
I’ve made a few suggestions in terms of a Dallas trade already, but that’s purely speculation on my part. I would far rather make a huge play for Giannis than for AD, but if the Raps get AD I’d definitely be good with it.
I don't think Giannis wants to be here... he didn't even want to be here when Masai was in charge, definitely not now. He'll probably walk in summer of 2027 and we'd have to give up minimum Barnes to have a conversation with Milwaukee.
AD is a different move, it's a buy-low move, and we have as good a relation with Klutch as any team in the league. I'd feel more confident in keeping AD happy than Giannis.
From AD's perspective, he's playing for one last contact after this and he might have something to prove. Maybe he wants to be the best player on a finals-bound team to shed the label of being a 2nd banana. I don't know.
All the trade offers on ESPN are low-value, so if that's reflective of the actual market for AD I think you gotta go for it. You're just not getting a player that level, in a conveniently weak Eastern conference. Yeah he's injury prone and he wants term, but whatever, if your cost of purchase is low (IQ and Poeltl salary dump + mid first round pick + a prospect that likely won't pan out). I don't see any loss here, better than being a play-in team.