ItsDanger wrote:Ramako wrote:ItsDanger wrote:Hey, it worked on a lot of people here didn't it? Check mate.
So what's your point exactly?
First your position was essentially "well, it's weird that Masai brought someone to film the meeting. You can't blame Ed for being suspicious"
The counter was, "The guy wasn't filming the meeting, and nowhere was it claimed that he filmed the meeting. Ed was just making uninformed assumptions because he's a buffoon"
And your response is, "Stop being a pawn! They're obviously just trying to make Ed look bad!"
Whenever your nonsense gets countered, whether it's here or in the anti-vax thread, your 'go-to' move is just to claim that everyone else is just a pawn for not seeing the big picture.
Oh... what a brilliant and insightful perspective you must have on the wiles of the world!
So you think this isn't about RCI power struggle? Public opinion is often utilized, that's a common go to move. Just coincidence this Masai story came out days afterwards? Why didn't it come out weeks ago? Nothing that I'm saying is unusual in the business world. This crap is routine.
Of course that’s why it came out now. You don’t need to be as smart as you seem to think you are to come to that conclusion. That does t mean it isn’t true. They cited sources directly on the board and they’re not making vague accusations. They’re referencing very specific conversations/events/ and demands made by Rogers. They conclude by saying he was overruled by LT and complained to Silver.
I’m sure Rogers has his own version of events but it beggars belief that someone fabricated this entire story. It’s just not plausible particularly since the reporting done here is in a newspaper that presumably still has journalistic standards in terms of vetting sources rather than some random fool blogging on the net. This isn’t some story about a player wanting a trade either. You’d better believe that they didn’t run this story without having confirmed sources.




























