Tor_Raps wrote:JB7 wrote:Tor_Raps wrote:
I'm just comparing the fillers of Nwora + Lewis to ANY of those guys. We could have let Indy pick any 2 and they would actually have a big role on our team even if you don't think they're special. Most of us were hoping for another OG like deal instead of a pick heavy deal in a horrible draft.
The difference in the Pascal vs OG deal probably just comes down to value, and teams found OG way more valuable than Pascal.
I think the biggest thing was that OG probably already agreed to stay with the Knicks so they were comfortable trading a lot to us. Siakam kept saying he wanted to test free agency so that obviously makes other teams not want to give up much in return. That's the risk you run when you keep a guy who you never planned to max out, which is what most of us are frustrated with.
I think every team knew they needed to pay Pascal the max, which would make a deal easier if teams were willing to pay it to Siakam, because the team holding his bird rights could offer him the most.
Whereas with OG, nobody was saying he was worth the max, which makes trading for him more problematic because a team could sweep in and offer him a max, if the team trading for him was not intending on maxing him. I think the connections to OG via his agent gave NYK enough assurances to trade both RJ & IQ, plus the pick.
I just don't think Pascal was worth the max to most teams, and therefore teams were not willing to offer much because of the risk he could walk to any team offering it to him in free agency.