ImageImageImageImageImage

Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) **Presser at 5:15pm** Link Pg. 24

Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

Good Deal?

Yes
208
85%
No
38
15%
 
Total votes: 246

brownbobcat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,838
And1: 3,790
Joined: Jun 09, 2006

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#281 » by brownbobcat » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:41 pm

mtcan wrote:I'm guessing IQ or Barrett are the odd guy out depending on how the draft shakes out.

We sure do have a lot of guards that could eventually take over the starting spot as well in Gradey and Jakobe who I project could be potential starters in a year or so...which just so happens to coincide with RJ's contract expiring.

Agbaji would be my candidate if they moved someone. That contract is much easier to trade
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,016
And1: 2,246
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#282 » by Shakril » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:42 pm

douggood wrote:
Risk101 wrote:Masai is just building talent at this point so he can possibly strike on another Kawhi type of deal in the future is what I am assuming.

I also believe either RJ or Poeltl will be traded in the offseason depending on where we end up in the draft.

The way the roster is currently constructed I don't see those guys on the roster for the beginning of next season.

people are getting hung up on the actual dollar value, numbers are so big now
but lets compare the team cap wise to the season before we got kawhi

kyle 29% of cap (31 years old)
demar 28% (28 years old)
ibaka 21% (28 years old)
jonas 15.6 (25 years)
cj miles 8% (30 years)
~101% of cap
plus young bench

vs now

barnes25%
ingram24.5%
iq 21%
rj 18%
jacob 12.6%
~ 101% of cap
plus young bench.


Bad comparison, as the team above was a top contender in the east for years. Our team right now has to prove themselves.
User avatar
right between the eyes
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,574
And1: 6,884
Joined: Jul 19, 2004
   

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#283 » by right between the eyes » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:43 pm

disoblige wrote:I like the length!


That's what she said!
Sorry couldn't resist lol
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,016
And1: 2,246
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#284 » by Shakril » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:43 pm

bluerap23 wrote:
douggood wrote:
Jim Todd Jr. wrote:
Is it that expensive? Seems pretty normal to me.

25%
24.5%
21%
18%
12.6%

~~101% for starting line up and thats of the regular cap, not tax line.


Phoenix is paying more for 3 players...


Do you want compare ourselves to the Suns?
Jerry Lucas
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,870
And1: 1,822
Joined: Apr 01, 2021
     

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#285 » by Jerry Lucas » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:45 pm

Jerry Lucas wrote:With this extension confirmed, the Raptors as they stand will begin the season above the luxury tax line next season if they end up with a top 3 pick.

The possible implication here (and org messaging about their feelings on this draft could back this up), is that they are so high on the 3 players at the top of their draft board, that they may have already convinced ownership to spend into the tax next season if they can add a top 3 pick specifically, to this current group of players.

Going to reply to myself as an edit instead of actually editing: I made a mistake on the initial math I did. Once I saw bluerap's calculations, I realized it should have actually said top 6 in my post instead of top 3.

Something else that is of note that should have been in my original post, a top 4 pick would have the Raptors above both the tax line and the 1st apron. So basically if we win one of the draft lotteries we will be projected above the 1st apron.
My Masai/Bobby-type FRP Barttorvik queries: 4/4, zero misses

Team Find The Next Superstar Closer
DKB333
Pro Prospect
Posts: 794
And1: 453
Joined: Jul 25, 2024
   

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#286 » by DKB333 » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:46 pm

right between the eyes wrote:
disoblige wrote:I like the length!


That's what she said!
Sorry couldn't resist lol


He lacks girth. That is what she wants. :lol:
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,016
And1: 2,246
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#287 » by Shakril » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:46 pm

Dennis 37 wrote:
Shakril wrote:
Quattro wrote:
More like posters around here are so predictable. Who in their right minds would expect him to take a pay cut?


Who in their right mind pays that much for a big question mark?

He is constantly injured, it forces us to trade one of the other guys and nobody knows how good he actually still can be.
I hope it works out, but i have no confindence in BI whatsoever.


Was Kawhi not just as big a question mark? We didn't even know if he would show. Kyle was super ticked off losing his friend. That could have all gone bad.


Kwahi had only one big injury prior to that, won a chip and was a finals MVP. Oh and a top 5 player of the league. Yeah thats a risk i gladly take. But we are talking about a one-time All-Star that has a history of injuries.

Kwahis avalance of injuries came with the clippers.
User avatar
TimeForChange
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,644
And1: 4,938
Joined: Dec 23, 2023

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#288 » by TimeForChange » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:48 pm

Shakril wrote:
ForeverTFC wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:Where are all the posters who thought he would sign a deal starting at $34m? :lol:

This organization is so predictable.


I mean, it does start at $37 if you factor in max raises which most were. Is that so far off?



People sadly are quick to insult people for thinking differently. Creates a toxic environment.

agreed. why do people stick their nose in others business and start defending people when they don't even know the whole story?

Image

Tor_Raps decides to interject with his made up statistic of 95% when all I said was BI wouldn't settle for $34m in year 1 of his deal.

But let's continue, shall we?

Image

Oh look at that. Again, a reasonable response stating that if he did take a pay cut it would be great.

But again, let's continue.

Image

A reasonable prediction that was pretty much spot on, as 25% of the cap.

So now that $34m is pretty much the same as $38.1m, then I guess we're all right :rofl:
User avatar
Ado05
RealGM
Posts: 18,218
And1: 6,092
Joined: Aug 22, 2012
     

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#289 » by Ado05 » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:52 pm

Pretty much as expected, though I don’t think Ingram is a 40 mill a year guy.
User avatar
CPT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,508
And1: 3,031
Joined: Jan 21, 2002
Location: Osaka/Seoul/Toronto
         

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#290 » by CPT » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:53 pm

Better than I expected, but still more than I think he's worth.

Relieved that it doesn't seem to be among the worst contracts in the league, despite the PO.
Tripod
RealGM
Posts: 13,035
And1: 12,430
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
 

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#291 » by Tripod » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:55 pm

TSN betting analyst is on Overdrive and just said if Brown left at the end of the year, the Raps would have nothing to show for trading Siakam. Absolutely nothing!

How can a paid guy on TV who covers bball not know Walter and Ochai ate also part if the deal and if we didn't do the deal, we would still have KO+ the 1st.

Unbelievable
canada_dry
General Manager
Posts: 9,080
And1: 7,111
Joined: Aug 22, 2017

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#292 » by canada_dry » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:56 pm

Scase wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
Jim Todd Jr. wrote:
Is it that expensive? Seems pretty normal to me.


It’s expensive but that kinda goes away if they’re a top 6 seed team.

If they aren’t that, IQ or RJ are a goner.

A 6th seed right now is a .500 record. I would hope you'd get more for 160mil and all that experience. If we are attempting the trade a paperclip for a house, method here, then yeah RJ needs to go in the off season.
This year. With Orlando and philly decimated by injuries. I dont think .500 is gonna be the 6th seed next year. Maybe though. Who knows.
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,016
And1: 2,246
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#293 » by Shakril » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:56 pm

TimeForChange wrote:
Shakril wrote:
ForeverTFC wrote:
I mean, it does start at $37 if you factor in max raises which most were. Is that so far off?



People sadly are quick to insult people for thinking differently. Creates a toxic environment.

agreed. why do people stick their nose in others business and start defending people when they don't even know the whole story?

Image

Tor_Raps decides to interject with his made up statistic of 95% when all I said was BI wouldn't settle for $34m in year 1 of his deal.

But let's continue, shall we?

Image

Oh look at that. Again, a reasonable response stating that if he did take a pay cut it would be great.

But again, let's continue.

Image

A reasonable prediction that was pretty much spot on, as 25% of the cap.

So now that $34m is pretty much the same as $38.1m, then I guess we're all right :rofl:


Your defense against beeing toxic is, beeing toxic?

Mocking him and others about their believe that 34/35/36 Mil was a reasonable price - thats toxic.

And your defense right now, just adds to the mockery.

In the end you were right, but i and others still think its not wise to give BI that contract. I just hope we are wrong and everything works out. But what if we end up beeing right? Shall we mock you and point that out? I dont think that would be a nice thing to do.
User avatar
Scase
RealGM
Posts: 14,640
And1: 10,782
Joined: Feb 02, 2009
Location: Ottawa by way of MTL
       

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#294 » by Scase » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:56 pm

Dennis 37 wrote:
Shakril wrote:
Quattro wrote:
More like posters around here are so predictable. Who in their right minds would expect him to take a pay cut?


Who in their right mind pays that much for a big question mark?

He is constantly injured, it forces us to trade one of the other guys and nobody knows how good he actually still can be.
I hope it works out, but i have no confindence in BI whatsoever.


Was Kawhi not just as big a question mark? We didn't even know if he would show. Kyle was super ticked off losing his friend. That could have all gone bad.

Sure, if you ignore him winning a championship and a FMVP. BI has accomplished nothing in his career aside from a single ASG appearance 6 years ago. Taking a risk on a proven player who has injury concerns is vastly different from a player with no career accomplishments AND injury concerns.

It's also very different when you had a 50+ win team for years in a row unable to get past the hump, vs 2 back to back 20ish win teams.
Image
Props TZ!
Shakril
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,016
And1: 2,246
Joined: Feb 10, 2023

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#295 » by Shakril » Tue Feb 11, 2025 10:58 pm

Tripod wrote:TSN betting analyst is on Overdrive and just said if Brown left at the end of the year, the Raps would have nothing to show for trading Siakam. Absolutely nothing!

How can a paid guy on TV who covers bball not know Walter and Ochai ate also part if the deal and if we didn't do the deal, we would still have KO+ the 1st.

Unbelievable


They are paid to talk, not to know. Barely any of those talking heads are doing there research themselves.
User avatar
TimeForChange
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,644
And1: 4,938
Joined: Dec 23, 2023

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#296 » by TimeForChange » Tue Feb 11, 2025 11:02 pm

Shakril wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:
Shakril wrote:

People sadly are quick to insult people for thinking differently. Creates a toxic environment.

agreed. why do people stick their nose in others business and start defending people when they don't even know the whole story?

Image

Tor_Raps decides to interject with his made up statistic of 95% when all I said was BI wouldn't settle for $34m in year 1 of his deal.

But let's continue, shall we?

Image

Oh look at that. Again, a reasonable response stating that if he did take a pay cut it would be great.

But again, let's continue.

Image

A reasonable prediction that was pretty much spot on, as 25% of the cap.

So now that $34m is pretty much the same as $38.1m, then I guess we're all right :rofl:


Your defense against beeing toxic is, beeing toxic?

Mocking him and others about their believe that 34/35/36 Mil was a reasonable price - thats toxic.

And your defense right now, just adds to the mockery.

In the end you were right, but i and others still think its not wise to give BI that contract. I just hope we are wrong and everything works out. But what if we end up beeing right? Shall we mock you and point that out? I dont think that would be a nice thing to do.
who was I toxic to exactly? were there any names in my original post?

The TFC dude is the one who started going off on me without any context.

and yes, if I am wrong, I want to be called out. hell, you have called me and others out about Jak lot's of times.

this is a message board. people have been calling others out on message boards forever. don't take things so personal.
Quattro
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,040
And1: 9,621
Joined: Jan 29, 2016
   

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#297 » by Quattro » Tue Feb 11, 2025 11:02 pm

Shakril wrote:
Tripod wrote:TSN betting analyst is on Overdrive and just said if Brown left at the end of the year, the Raps would have nothing to show for trading Siakam. Absolutely nothing!

How can a paid guy on TV who covers bball not know Walter and Ochai ate also part if the deal and if we didn't do the deal, we would still have KO+ the 1st.

Unbelievable


They are paid to talk, not to know. Barely any of those talking heads are doing there research themselves.


Sometimes they get confused when they don't see a little rubber puck.
sbsat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,563
And1: 6,175
Joined: Jan 03, 2014

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#298 » by sbsat » Tue Feb 11, 2025 11:03 pm

Quattro wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:Where are all the posters who thought he would sign a deal starting at $34m? :lol:

This organization is so predictable.


More like posters around here are so predictable. Who in their right minds would expect him to take a pay cut?


This place thinks every contract weve ever signed is an overpay
DKB333
Pro Prospect
Posts: 794
And1: 453
Joined: Jul 25, 2024
   

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#299 » by DKB333 » Tue Feb 11, 2025 11:03 pm

People are not understanding that the Raptors just got a USA player that wanted to be traded here. That has never happened. He would have got this deal somewhere else. This is a huge win and BI is a baller. I do not understand the hate for this. It is not like he got a LaVine deal. He got a fair deal AND WANTS TO BE IN TORONTO.
















ha
User avatar
TimeForChange
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,644
And1: 4,938
Joined: Dec 23, 2023

Re: Shams: BI extension (3 Years $120M) 

Post#300 » by TimeForChange » Tue Feb 11, 2025 11:04 pm

sbsat wrote:
Quattro wrote:
TimeForChange wrote:Where are all the posters who thought he would sign a deal starting at $34m? :lol:

This organization is so predictable.


More like posters around here are so predictable. Who in their right minds would expect him to take a pay cut?


This place thinks every contract weve ever signed is an overpay

this place also thinks every move the organization makes is a tremendous move

Return to Toronto Raptors