Again...
- Haliburton has been third team All-NBA twice. So has Siakam. Top 15, but not top 10.
- Haliburton has never received any votes for MVP. Siakam has: he finished 10th in 2020. So by MVP accolades, he's not considered a top 10 player. So maybe 11-20 range?
- Haliburton was voted "most overrated" by fellow NBA players in March/April.
^ Honestly are those "superstar" accolades? Would you honestly have called him a superstar a couple months ago? What about two years ago when the Pacers had Hali, Turner, Carlisle, Nesmith, Nembhard, and finished out of the playoffs at 35-47?
I don't think you would have called him a superstar then. I think if that was the Raptors, a bunch of y'all would have said, "Tear it down. Treadmill team. We need a superstar. Hali is overrated." (Ya know, "overrated", like fellow NBA players called him.)
But
now he's a superstar because this is your worldview:
- You have to have a "superstar" to be a contender.
- Siakam is not a "superstar".
- Therefore the Pacers must have a "superstar" besides Siakam.
My worldview is different. I think you have to have a good core that fits to be a contender. I think Hali, Siakam, and Turner is a good core. I think the "superstar" designation is arbitrary, and it has y'all twisting yourselves in knots.