ImageImageImageImageImage

The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either

Moderators: Morris_Shatford, DG88, niQ, 7 Footer, lebron stopper, Reeko, Duffman100, HiJiNX, tsherkin

NotMyKawhi
Head Coach
Posts: 6,100
And1: 5,276
Joined: Jul 13, 2018

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#301 » by NotMyKawhi » Sat Jan 9, 2021 2:14 am

Psubs wrote:
Mark_83 wrote:If we get a late first for Kyle, who are some of the players you guys have interest in taking?

Of the guys I've seen so far I'm intrigued by:

Scottie Lewis
Chris Duarte
Charles Bassey
Keyontae Johnson
Corey Kispert
Ibou Dianko Badji


Late 1st is like drafting in 2020. So many possibilties.

Bassey (Mitchell Robinson)
Kispert (Joe Harris)
Kai Jones (Myles Turner)
Dosunmu
Garza
Jokubaitis
Daishen Nix
Butler
Franz Wagner (Mauritz's bro is like Mike Dunleavy Jr)


Josh Chrisptopher is gonna be nice
User avatar
Reeko
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 28,791
And1: 41,644
Joined: Jan 04, 2015
Location: East side, in a deluxe apartment in the sky.
   

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#302 » by Reeko » Sat Jan 9, 2021 2:14 am

PrinceAli wrote:
Reeko wrote:
Psubs wrote:
Late 1st is like drafting in 2020. So many possibilties.

Bassey (Mitchell Robinson)
Kispert (Joe Harris)
Kai Jones (Myles Turner)
Dosunmu
Garza
Jokubaitis
Daishen Nix
Butler
Franz Wagner (Mauritz's bro is like Mike Dunleavy Jr)


I'm seeing Bassey being mocked in the lottery, but he might fall like Precious Achiuwa did. I like Kispert, I also like Gonzaga's center Timme, he's got a really crafty game although I'm not sure how it will translate at the next level.

Another guy we should keep an eye on is Lithuanian big man Azuola Tubelis from Arizona, he's considered the best European prospect to go to college in America. He's 6'11 and he's hitting 3's at 36% clip, averaging 11 and 6 in 21 mpg.

Tubelis is intriguing. Any idea where he’s being mocked? He dropped 31 on Mobley last night

According to nbadraft.net he isn't expected to declare this year or next, because they don't have him in any of their mocks. If he does declare, I imagine he's a late first rounder at best and more likely a second rounder.
Clay Davis wrote:COMPOSED ONLY OF THE COOLEST WOMEN AND THE HOTTEST GUYS, THE TORONTO RAPTORS REALGM BOARD HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS HIGH-QUALITY DISCUSSION, PASSIONATE LOYALTY, TEMPERATE CELEBRATIONS OF VICTORY, AND GRACE IN DEFEAT.
User avatar
_MidNight_
RealGM
Posts: 12,261
And1: 7,570
Joined: May 12, 2007
 

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#303 » by _MidNight_ » Sat Jan 9, 2021 2:22 am

BBallG wrote:I like Green and Kuminga cause they seem to have more star potential than the rest. Green is quicker and more crafty/flashy but Kuminga has beastly size/skill combo and both are high flyers.

Kid takes off nearly from the ft line and makes this layup look easy but it's **** ridiculous for his size...

https://youtu.be/Vji6eBO0cuY?t=620


I want him on our team so so badly.

This is the dynamic wing player I've been hoping for year!

Please basketball Gods! :pray:
User avatar
Bruin
RealGM
Posts: 26,261
And1: 41,600
Joined: Mar 11, 2018
       

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#304 » by Bruin » Sat Jan 9, 2021 2:28 am

Reeko wrote:
PrinceAli wrote:
Reeko wrote:
I'm seeing Bassey being mocked in the lottery, but he might fall like Precious Achiuwa did. I like Kispert, I also like Gonzaga's center Timme, he's got a really crafty game although I'm not sure how it will translate at the next level.

Another guy we should keep an eye on is Lithuanian big man Azuola Tubelis from Arizona, he's considered the best European prospect to go to college in America. He's 6'11 and he's hitting 3's at 36% clip, averaging 11 and 6 in 21 mpg.

Tubelis is intriguing. Any idea where he’s being mocked? He dropped 31 on Mobley last night

According to nbadraft.net he isn't expected to declare this year or next, because they don't have him in any of their mocks. If he does declare, I imagine he's a late first rounder at best and more likely a second rounder.

I suspect his stock will continue to rise throughout the season. Good guy to keep an eye on
Image
Metallikid
RealGM
Posts: 10,723
And1: 9,974
Joined: Mar 10, 2010

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#305 » by Metallikid » Sat Jan 9, 2021 2:32 am

billy_hoyle wrote:
Metallikid wrote:
billy_hoyle wrote:
I couldn't disagree more with this stance.

You don't need to bottom out to get a bottom 5 pick. There has been a flattening of lottery odds for this exact reason. Add that this is a shortened season where we have started way slower than expected and we might be getting a high pick while also not being that far off from being a second round team.

Couple that with the max slot and the massive hole at C in our line-up. These things are all working to Help us quickly rebuild.

We have 3 players from a championship level core (FVV, Siakam and OG). I understand we are missing the superstar talent from the championship team recipe, but still having two-way complimentary starters is HUGE. I think this is suppressing current wins (obviously), but will enable a massive jump forward.

We have all our picks. We have veterans to trade off for more picks (Lowry, Norm).

And something that has not been discussed is the double draft next year. I think it plays right into a quick rebuild plan. We will hopefully draft high this year, then plug our center hole with our max slot, then vault into mediocrity with a young potential star trying to integrate into a veteran starting lineup.
If we are mediocre, we will have a mid teens pick, IMO this is incredibly valuable for a double draft with high schoolers. Our scouting staff will be put to the test, but I'd bet quite a bit there will be all-stars drafted in the teens and later in a double draft class.


So your assertion is that we won't be bad enough to have a bottom five record, but that we'll get something like the 8th pick and move up? That's a total crapshoot.

And our capspace isn't **** worth dick if we're a bad team without Kyle Lowry, and him and Norm can't be moved so easily like everyone here apparently thinks they can. Sacrificing our chemistry for some crappy picks that won't even be developed by the time Pascal and Fred's contracts are over is a ludicrous strategy. High picks do not fit our timeline, and we aren't likely to get one in the first place.

You are giving yourself so many charitable assumptions that honestly, it is just as reasonable for me to suggest that we should do my move for Vucevic and that a couple years from now we'll be able to trade OG (18 mil) or Fred (21 mil) and Nikola (22 mil) for someone on a supermax deal as anything you are saying.


Honestly, your opinion is basically garbage. You call having the 8th worst record a 'crapshoot' to move up. Look at the bloody flattened odds man. At the 10th spot you have a 1 in 3 chance of moving into the top 5!

That's way better than in previous years. That's why the Pelicans snagged Zion.

You want to bank on 35 yr old Lowry. That's never been the plan. We were always gearing up for Giannis. Sucks that we need to pivot, but we CAN throw money at a positive (long term) asset this summer. Let's wait and see who improves, no point in guessing right now.


So you think as a franchise we should bet our future on a 30% chance to move up in the draft...

But my opinion is garbage.

The problem with people like you is even if the Raptors did exactly what you wanted you wouldn't have anything to say and no leg to stand on when we don't move up in the draft, or we move down in the draft, or we don't get a high enough pick to begin with, or if we get a high pick but they end up being a bust. All you'll ever have to say is, 'they didn't lose enough'. Your only answer is losing. There's a word for people like that.
NotMyKawhi
Head Coach
Posts: 6,100
And1: 5,276
Joined: Jul 13, 2018

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#306 » by NotMyKawhi » Sat Jan 9, 2021 2:35 am

Jalen Green has passed Kuminga for #1 on my board

Never realized how quick he was. My only problem w him is he isn't a killer like Kuminga. Kuminga has more kobe mentally, Green has more superman talent.

The G league guys will be slept on all year.

NotMyKawhi
Head Coach
Posts: 6,100
And1: 5,276
Joined: Jul 13, 2018

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#307 » by NotMyKawhi » Sat Jan 9, 2021 2:43 am

Pistons just won, we are officially #1


lesss gooooo
CoinTossRoss31
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,511
And1: 1,516
Joined: Jan 01, 2013
Location: Ottawa
         

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#308 » by CoinTossRoss31 » Sat Jan 9, 2021 2:46 am

Detroit win was huge for the tank. If we lose tonight I dare to even call it a Michael Scott " Win-Win-Win"
Image
User avatar
blastttOFF
General Manager
Posts: 7,849
And1: 8,875
Joined: Mar 13, 2007

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#309 » by blastttOFF » Sat Jan 9, 2021 2:47 am

Jalen Green will be better overall. He can score in so many ways. Better passer and overall feel. Also a good motor.
Draft Kai Soto with a second rounder then we got an all Filipino squad
billy_hoyle
Veteran
Posts: 2,583
And1: 1,686
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#310 » by billy_hoyle » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:03 am

Metallikid wrote:
billy_hoyle wrote:
Metallikid wrote:
So your assertion is that we won't be bad enough to have a bottom five record, but that we'll get something like the 8th pick and move up? That's a total crapshoot.

And our capspace isn't **** worth dick if we're a bad team without Kyle Lowry, and him and Norm can't be moved so easily like everyone here apparently thinks they can. Sacrificing our chemistry for some crappy picks that won't even be developed by the time Pascal and Fred's contracts are over is a ludicrous strategy. High picks do not fit our timeline, and we aren't likely to get one in the first place.

You are giving yourself so many charitable assumptions that honestly, it is just as reasonable for me to suggest that we should do my move for Vucevic and that a couple years from now we'll be able to trade OG (18 mil) or Fred (21 mil) and Nikola (22 mil) for someone on a supermax deal as anything you are saying.


Honestly, your opinion is basically garbage. You call having the 8th worst record a 'crapshoot' to move up. Look at the bloody flattened odds man. At the 10th spot you have a 1 in 3 chance of moving into the top 5!

That's way better than in previous years. That's why the Pelicans snagged Zion.

You want to bank on 35 yr old Lowry. That's never been the plan. We were always gearing up for Giannis. Sucks that we need to pivot, but we CAN throw money at a positive (long term) asset this summer. Let's wait and see who improves, no point in guessing right now.


So you think as a franchise we should bet our future on a 30% chance to move up in the draft...

But my opinion is garbage.

The problem with people like you is even if the Raptors did exactly what you wanted you wouldn't have anything to say and no leg to stand on when we don't move up in the draft, or we move down in the draft, or we don't get a high enough pick to begin with, or if we get a high pick but they end up being a bust. All you'll ever have to say is, 'they didn't lose enough'. Your only answer is losing. There's a word for people like that.


I'm not pro tank.

I'm of the opinion we will naturally be in that range, and that we are naturally at the end of Lowry's time with the team.

Your the one who can't recognize that we need more talent, and that we are going through a natural downswing.

It doesn't matter what I want. The standings will playout. We will end up around where we were always going to eventually end up, trading Lowry isn't going to impact 10 games in the standings. Maybe 4-5. We have competent PGs on this team. The draft will distribute talent as it always has. We have great management with a keen eye for talent. I'm happy for them to have a wider group to select from (that's all a higher draft pick does, there is no guarantee we don't pick a bust).

I'm just agreeing that things are naturally setting up for a quick rebuild, which is exactly the point the other poster made.

You can prefer to trade those picks for win now players, I think that's much, much less than 30% likely to help us. Obviously, that depends on the players available to trade.

Your one of those posters that thinks we can trade TD, Baynes and 2 x 1sts for Beal...

It's easy to make dumb strawman arguments.
Metallikid
RealGM
Posts: 10,723
And1: 9,974
Joined: Mar 10, 2010

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#311 » by Metallikid » Sat Jan 9, 2021 3:27 am

billy_hoyle wrote:
Metallikid wrote:
billy_hoyle wrote:
Honestly, your opinion is basically garbage. You call having the 8th worst record a 'crapshoot' to move up. Look at the bloody flattened odds man. At the 10th spot you have a 1 in 3 chance of moving into the top 5!

That's way better than in previous years. That's why the Pelicans snagged Zion.

You want to bank on 35 yr old Lowry. That's never been the plan. We were always gearing up for Giannis. Sucks that we need to pivot, but we CAN throw money at a positive (long term) asset this summer. Let's wait and see who improves, no point in guessing right now.


So you think as a franchise we should bet our future on a 30% chance to move up in the draft...

But my opinion is garbage.

The problem with people like you is even if the Raptors did exactly what you wanted you wouldn't have anything to say and no leg to stand on when we don't move up in the draft, or we move down in the draft, or we don't get a high enough pick to begin with, or if we get a high pick but they end up being a bust. All you'll ever have to say is, 'they didn't lose enough'. Your only answer is losing. There's a word for people like that.


I'm not pro tank.

I'm of the opinion we will naturally be in that range, and that we are naturally at the end of Lowry's time with the team.

Your the one who can't recognize that we need more talent, and that we are going through a natural downswing.

It doesn't matter what I want. The standings will playout. We will end up around where we were always going to eventually end up, trading Lowry isn't going to impact 10 games in the standings. Maybe 4-5. We have competent PGs on this team. The draft will distribute talent as it always has. We have great management with a keen eye for talent. I'm happy for them to have a wider group to select from (that's all a higher draft pick does, there is no guarantee we don't pick a bust).

I'm just agreeing that things are naturally setting up for a quick rebuild, which is exactly the point the other poster made.

You can prefer to trade those picks for win now players, I think that's much, much less than 30% likely to help us. Obviously, that depends on the players available to trade.

Your one of those posters that thinks we can trade TD, Baynes and 2 x 1sts for Beal...

It's easy to make dumb strawman arguments.


I don't know what you're talking about I've never wanted Beal.
billy_hoyle
Veteran
Posts: 2,583
And1: 1,686
Joined: Jun 16, 2008

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#312 » by billy_hoyle » Sat Jan 9, 2021 4:18 am

Metallikid wrote:
billy_hoyle wrote:
Metallikid wrote:
So you think as a franchise we should bet our future on a 30% chance to move up in the draft...

But my opinion is garbage.

The problem with people like you is even if the Raptors did exactly what you wanted you wouldn't have anything to say and no leg to stand on when we don't move up in the draft, or we move down in the draft, or we don't get a high enough pick to begin with, or if we get a high pick but they end up being a bust. All you'll ever have to say is, 'they didn't lose enough'. Your only answer is losing. There's a word for people like that.


I'm not pro tank.

I'm of the opinion we will naturally be in that range, and that we are naturally at the end of Lowry's time with the team.

Your the one who can't recognize that we need more talent, and that we are going through a natural downswing.

It doesn't matter what I want. The standings will playout. We will end up around where we were always going to eventually end up, trading Lowry isn't going to impact 10 games in the standings. Maybe 4-5. We have competent PGs on this team. The draft will distribute talent as it always has. We have great management with a keen eye for talent. I'm happy for them to have a wider group to select from (that's all a higher draft pick does, there is no guarantee we don't pick a bust).

I'm just agreeing that things are naturally setting up for a quick rebuild, which is exactly the point the other poster made.

You can prefer to trade those picks for win now players, I think that's much, much less than 30% likely to help us. Obviously, that depends on the players available to trade.

Your one of those posters that thinks we can trade TD, Baynes and 2 x 1sts for Beal...

It's easy to make dumb strawman arguments.


I don't know what you're talking about I've never wanted Beal.


Ya... That's my point. I was giving an example of a strawman argument, to mirror your take on my post. You said you think the only way to win is to make trades. I'm pointing out that we have no idea what the value other clubs will accept in trade. That and the fact trades in theory are zero sum acts. You need to give to get. How do you come out ahead? Your basically just trying to trade the future for now, or now for the future. That's a crapshoot to me.

The draft is actually specifically set up to redistribute better players/talent to worse teams.

You criticized the idea that we need to rely on FA and the draft to rebuild assets (which I think is obvious).
User avatar
BramptonYute
Head Coach
Posts: 6,847
And1: 8,683
Joined: Mar 14, 2013
     

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#313 » by BramptonYute » Sat Jan 9, 2021 4:49 am

Read on Twitter
720
Banned User
Posts: 33,172
And1: 67,799
Joined: Nov 01, 2012

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#314 » by 720 » Sat Jan 9, 2021 4:55 am

BramptonYute wrote:
Read on Twitter

:clap: :nod:
C-R-E-A-M-
Senior
Posts: 515
And1: 803
Joined: Mar 27, 2016
 

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#315 » by C-R-E-A-M- » Sat Jan 9, 2021 5:31 am

get wins every once in a while. keep the tank a secret. Cade is coming home boys
720
Banned User
Posts: 33,172
And1: 67,799
Joined: Nov 01, 2012

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#316 » by 720 » Sat Jan 9, 2021 5:57 am

Read on Twitter


:lol:
jimmy keys
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,013
And1: 2,889
Joined: Jan 04, 2009

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#317 » by jimmy keys » Sat Jan 9, 2021 1:42 pm

Top 5 looks stacked. All of them have superstar potential, all of them are better than anyone from the 2020 class. If there ever was a year to tank it's this one. Let's go!
720
Banned User
Posts: 33,172
And1: 67,799
Joined: Nov 01, 2012

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#318 » by 720 » Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:03 am

The Timberwolves have been next level with their Tank but Towns is finally back so they should start winning some games.
User avatar
Bruin
RealGM
Posts: 26,261
And1: 41,600
Joined: Mar 11, 2018
       

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#319 » by Bruin » Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:08 am

720 wrote:The Timberwolves have been next level with their Tank but Towns is finally back so they should start winning some games.

Fortunately they don’t own their pick so they have no reason to try at least. Unless they just tank super hard since they have the pick 1-3 protected
Image
User avatar
Son Goku 25
RealGM
Posts: 27,115
And1: 42,189
Joined: Jan 18, 2010
 

Re: The Official Cunningham vs Suggs Thread #Tank4Either 

Post#320 » by Son Goku 25 » Sun Jan 10, 2021 2:21 am

The pain of these losses (from 2021 season) as a Raps fanc will subside very quickly. The honor of a champion will remain and soon we'll be back at the top.

Return to Toronto Raptors