ImageImageImageImageImage

Official RJ Barrett Thread

Moderators: Morris_Shatford, 7 Footer, DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX

User avatar
hyper316
RealGM
Posts: 14,804
And1: 10,112
Joined: Dec 23, 2006
   

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#301 » by hyper316 » Wed Jan 3, 2024 2:20 am

Boogie! wrote:
lebron stopper wrote:
brownbobcat wrote:It was the right move, but definitely disappointing. Every season since, Norm has played better, been paid less and has higher trade value today.

The only possible upside is maybe they keep him for MLE money and he transforms into a serviceable 3&D player. I still think there's potential for that


Agreed on everything, except right move.

I would instead say right idea but wrong move: they went after the wrong prospect+pick package and it was very likely going to be downhill from there IMO. There were signs before that trade that Gary Trent Jr. wasn't all that he was cracked up to be. Like, for example, the fact that he had a whopping total of 3 assists in a 5-game playoff series. Or the fact that he had trouble defending during his time with the Blazers. Look at his lack of physical tools and athleticism compared to Powell, as well as Powell's improbable development curve, and you really have to wonder how Trent got hyped as "soon to be better than Powell" back then. That imagined upside was just not there.

It's one thing to covet prospects who have actually shown serious upside to speed up your rebuild timeline, as Masai did with trading OG Anunoby for Immanuel Quickley. That kind of move is understandable, especially given the situation with OG's contract, as well as IQ's impressive track record in his first few seasons with the Knicks as a reserve. Masai did well there, and I doubt many will regret that trade whatsoever when we look back 2-3 years from now.

But it's another thing to completely gamble on guys like Trent, someone who has shown little before the Raptors acquired him, and has continued to show little since then (aside from a half-season stretch of getting away with gambling on defense, which predictably fizzled out). Not only do you have to pay those "proven prospects" much more for potential, but if they fail to show anything, you are totally screwed because you threw away good talent for much less value, and you have little recourse (can't get back more value in a trade) because those players are close to being realized. As we all know right now, a part of the reason why the Raptors are stuck is because they bet on Trent, which they lost so badly that there is no way to get any value for him anymore. My guess is he will end up walking this offseason or become a throw-in for a Siakam trade (just as Achiuwa was a throw-in for the Anunoby trade).


I never understood why they traded powell who seemingly wanted to be here, and fit the timeline of both fvv and siakam, if their goal was to build with both fvv and siakam and even og. There was already chemistry in place and norman had turned a corner and became a lights out shooter with good finishing ability inside.

I knew trying to build with fvv would be a problem, but if they were gonna do it it made more sense to keep that group together. Instead they completely rucked everything up with their direction.


Craziest thing is that Masai refused to pay Norm when he got 5 years 80M (16M per) when he gave Trent 18.5M per for a lesser player
User avatar
WaltFrazier
RealGM
Posts: 34,004
And1: 31,545
Joined: Jan 21, 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
       

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#302 » by WaltFrazier » Wed Jan 3, 2024 2:43 am

Boogie! wrote:
lebron stopper wrote:
brownbobcat wrote:It was the right move, but definitely disappointing. Every season since, Norm has played better, been paid less and has higher trade value today.

The only possible upside is maybe they keep him for MLE money and he transforms into a serviceable 3&D player. I still think there's potential for that


Agreed on everything, except right move.

I would instead say right idea but wrong move: they went after the wrong prospect+pick package and it was very likely going to be downhill from there IMO. There were signs before that trade that Gary Trent Jr. wasn't all that he was cracked up to be. Like, for example, the fact that he had a whopping total of 3 assists in a 5-game playoff series. Or the fact that he had trouble defending during his time with the Blazers. Look at his lack of physical tools and athleticism compared to Powell, as well as Powell's improbable development curve, and you really have to wonder how Trent got hyped as "soon to be better than Powell" back then. That imagined upside was just not there.

It's one thing to covet prospects who have actually shown serious upside to speed up your rebuild timeline, as Masai did with trading OG Anunoby for Immanuel Quickley. That kind of move is understandable, especially given the situation with OG's contract, as well as IQ's impressive track record in his first few seasons with the Knicks as a reserve. Masai did well there, and I doubt many will regret that trade whatsoever when we look back 2-3 years from now.

But it's another thing to completely gamble on guys like Trent, someone who has shown little before the Raptors acquired him, and has continued to show little since then (aside from a half-season stretch of getting away with gambling on defense, which predictably fizzled out). Not only do you have to pay those "proven prospects" much more for potential, but if they fail to show anything, you are totally screwed because you threw away good talent for much less value, and you have little recourse (can't get back more value in a trade) because those players are close to being realized. As we all know right now, a part of the reason why the Raptors are stuck is because they bet on Trent, which they lost so badly that there is no way to get any value for him anymore. My guess is he will end up walking this offseason or become a throw-in for a Siakam trade (just as Achiuwa was a throw-in for the Anunoby trade).


I never understood why they traded powell who seemingly wanted to be here, and fit the timeline of both fvv and siakam, if their goal was to build with both fvv and siakam and even og. There was already chemistry in place and norman had turned a corner and became a lights out shooter with good finishing ability inside.

I knew trying to build with fvv would be a problem, but if they were gonna do it it made more sense to keep that group together. Instead they completely rucked everything up with their direction.

Yup they could have kept Norm, kept the group together - Pascal FVV OG Norm, let Kyle go as they did. As Norm said later, keep the four guys together who came up together behind Kyle and DD. Added a C and a Quickley type guard along the way, and had a nice competitive team to build on. Assuming if we'd kept Norm in the Tampa year we still get Scottie after. Or Wagner, Sengun etc.
There goes my hero. Watch him as he goes.
cbosh4mvp
Suspended
Posts: 5,172
And1: 816
Joined: Jun 02, 2005
Location: Vaughan
 

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#303 » by cbosh4mvp » Wed Jan 3, 2024 6:48 am

Lots of people underestimating the Barrett acquisiton.

Barrett is 23 and is arguably one of the top 7 prospects to ever put on a Raptor uniform. If not at least top 10.

Think about it.

1. Vince
2. Barnes
3. TMAC
4. Bosh
5. Derozan
7. ?

Am I missing someone? He's not terrible and actually I see the trio of Quickley/Barnes/Barrett a really promising one. All 3 can create off the dribble, have good size at their position and 2/3 are good post up options too. Siakam makes this a truly scary combo but obviously we may go the other direction for the time being.

In any case, he's a good prospect, a top 3 pick, 23 years old and last I checked is a 18PPG for his career. In no way is this guy a Bust. He's also not a complete player, he's got a lot of room to grow and evolve. I see a lot Demar in him in terms of footwork. If he can become a reliable 20/5/4 guy with good efficiency and good TEAM D, thats a perfect SG to roll with. Quickly as your PG, Barnes at 3 or 4. You can build around this.
HKBOY
Rookie
Posts: 1,020
And1: 1,657
Joined: Mar 14, 2011

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#304 » by HKBOY » Wed Jan 3, 2024 8:47 am

cbosh4mvp wrote:Lots of people underestimating the Barrett acquisiton.

Barrett is 23 and is arguably one of the top 7 prospects to ever put on a Raptor uniform. If not at least top 10.

Think about it.

1. Vince
2. Barnes
3. TMAC
4. Bosh
5. Derozan
7. ?

Am I missing someone? He's not terrible and actually I see the trio of Quickley/Barnes/Barrett a really promising one. All 3 can create off the dribble, have good size at their position and 2/3 are good post up options too. Siakam makes this a truly scary combo but obviously we may go the other direction for the time being.

In any case, he's a good prospect, a top 3 pick, 23 years old and last I checked is a 18PPG for his career. In no way is this guy a Bust. He's also not a complete player, he's got a lot of room to grow and evolve. I see a lot Demar in him in terms of footwork. If he can become a reliable 20/5/4 guy with good efficiency and good TEAM D, thats a perfect SG to roll with. Quickly as your PG, Barnes at 3 or 4. You can build around this.


6-9 are probably Stoudamire, Camby, JV, Bargs.

I agree with you. Right now, RJ is a less athletic pre-2013 DeMar but with more offensive skills and plays better defense. He has flaws in his game but he is definitely not a bust and he competes hard. I think a lot of people are underrating him because of where he was drafted. Many expected him to be a star but he won't have that pressure here.

Once Pascal is gone, the new pecking order would be Barnes, IQ, hopefully another blue chip prospect from the Pascal trade, RJ. He just has to bring his efficiency up a little bit and be a solid 4th option for us. With a more defined role, this should be achievable given his size and talents.
mdenny
General Manager
Posts: 7,558
And1: 7,307
Joined: Jul 05, 2019
         

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#305 » by mdenny » Wed Jan 3, 2024 9:10 am

RJ is gonna be a source of hate from casual fans. Free throw attempts aren't reflected in efficiency numbers. Efficiency #s are the love of video game and fantasy league fans. OG could not dribble the ball. RJ can dribble. It's one upside even tho OG is clearly the better player currently. Rj can say "eff it" and bully his way into the paint.
sbsat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,564
And1: 6,175
Joined: Jan 03, 2014

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#306 » by sbsat » Wed Jan 3, 2024 9:22 am

mdenny wrote:RJ is gonna be a source of hate from casual fans. Free throw attempts aren't reflected in efficiency numbers. Efficiency #s are the love of video game and fantasy league fans. OG could not dribble the ball. RJ can dribble. It's one upside even tho OG is clearly the better player currently. Rj can say "eff it" and bully his way into the paint.


Ts% accounts for fta
brownbobcat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,839
And1: 3,790
Joined: Jun 09, 2006

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#307 » by brownbobcat » Wed Jan 3, 2024 9:43 am

lebron stopper wrote:Agreed on everything, except right move.

Right move meaning the idea, not necessarily the execution. You also have to keep in mind this was the Tampa tank, so they didn't have Barnes yet. Trying to rebuild around Siakam/FVV/OG/Norm would've been very challenging.
User avatar
Boogie!
RealGM
Posts: 68,415
And1: 57,534
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Ba da da da daaaaaa. If you build it, they will come!
Contact:
   

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#308 » by Boogie! » Wed Jan 3, 2024 12:07 pm

brownbobcat wrote:
lebron stopper wrote:Agreed on everything, except right move.

Right move meaning the idea, not necessarily the execution. You also have to keep in mind this was the Tampa tank, so they didn't have Barnes yet. Trying to rebuild around Siakam/FVV/OG/Norm would've been very challenging.


But building around siakam/fvv/og/trent is less challenging?
mdenny wrote:In anycase....Masai is probably gonna make Fred the first active player/head coach in franchise history now that Nurse is out of the way. That's been the plan all along.
User avatar
GIZMO
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,674
And1: 2,795
Joined: Dec 22, 2005

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#309 » by GIZMO » Wed Jan 3, 2024 12:51 pm

Boogie! wrote:
brownbobcat wrote:
lebron stopper wrote:Agreed on everything, except right move.

Right move meaning the idea, not necessarily the execution. You also have to keep in mind this was the Tampa tank, so they didn't have Barnes yet. Trying to rebuild around Siakam/FVV/OG/Norm would've been very challenging.


But building around siakam/fvv/og/trent is less challenging?

I never understood the Norm trade. We didn’t want to pay Norm just so you can have the luxury to overpay Gary, who does nothing better than Norm. I know about potential and that’s why they did it but it doesn’t make sense imo.
User avatar
CPT
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 14,522
And1: 3,045
Joined: Jan 21, 2002
Location: Osaka/Seoul/Toronto
         

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#310 » by CPT » Wed Jan 3, 2024 1:43 pm

mdenny wrote:RJ is gonna be a source of hate from casual fans. Free throw attempts aren't reflected in efficiency numbers. Efficiency #s are the love of video game and fantasy league fans. OG could not dribble the ball. RJ can dribble. It's one upside even tho OG is clearly the better player currently. Rj can say "eff it" and bully his way into the paint.


Casual has been called.

I see it the other way around. Casuals are going to drink the TSN/Sportsnet Kool-aid that he was the prize of this trade. They might turn on him if he doesn't live up to that hype though. Casuals don't typically know about advanced stats.

Maybe by casual you mean Blog Boys?
sbsat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,564
And1: 6,175
Joined: Jan 03, 2014

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#311 » by sbsat » Wed Jan 3, 2024 1:47 pm

GIZMO wrote:
Boogie! wrote:
brownbobcat wrote:Right move meaning the idea, not necessarily the execution. You also have to keep in mind this was the Tampa tank, so they didn't have Barnes yet. Trying to rebuild around Siakam/FVV/OG/Norm would've been very challenging.


But building around siakam/fvv/og/trent is less challenging?

I never understood the Norm trade. We didn’t want to pay Norm just so you can have the luxury to overpay Gary, who does nothing better than Norm. I know about potential and that’s why they did it but it doesn’t make sense imo.


Potential is exactly why they did it. Do you remember gtj had a stretch of 5 games in a row where he scored 30+ points? Do you remember the season where he was menace with steals? This guy flashed a lot of potential it just didnt pan out.
User avatar
GIZMO
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,674
And1: 2,795
Joined: Dec 22, 2005

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#312 » by GIZMO » Wed Jan 3, 2024 1:58 pm

sbsat wrote:
GIZMO wrote:
Boogie! wrote:
But building around siakam/fvv/og/trent is less challenging?

I never understood the Norm trade. We didn’t want to pay Norm just so you can have the luxury to overpay Gary, who does nothing better than Norm. I know about potential and that’s why they did it but it doesn’t make sense imo.


Potential is exactly why they did it. Do you remember gtj had a stretch of 5 games in a row where he scored 30+ points? Do you remember the season where he was menace with steals? This guy flashed a lot of potential it just didnt pan out.

Do you remember 13 game Bargnani, he was oozing potential too.
Too many teams pay an absurd amount for potential that amount to nothing!
Boselecta
Senior
Posts: 698
And1: 779
Joined: Aug 13, 2021
   

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#313 » by Boselecta » Wed Jan 3, 2024 2:24 pm

This board is way too negative on Barrett. I've honestly never seen this level of negativity towards a newly acquired player.

Dude is a 23 year old on a decent contract and was a blue chip prospect being the 3rd pick. At this point in his career he has been more successful than Demar was at his age. He's going to surprise a lot of people very soon I feel a breakout coming.
TheGeneral99
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,732
And1: 6,231
Joined: Mar 11, 2023
   

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#314 » by TheGeneral99 » Wed Jan 3, 2024 2:35 pm

RJ is intriguing.

His sophomore season he averaged 18 and 6 on 44%fg and 40%3fg but has seemed to regress a little after. Maybe that has to do with Thibs basketball but we'll see if at 23 he can start improving.

https://www.reddit.com/r/nbadiscussion/comments/17vuaq9/is_rj_barrett_tricking_us/

This reddit thread above has an interesting analysis:
brownbobcat
Head Coach
Posts: 6,839
And1: 3,790
Joined: Jun 09, 2006

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#315 » by brownbobcat » Wed Jan 3, 2024 3:13 pm

Boogie! wrote:
brownbobcat wrote:
lebron stopper wrote:Agreed on everything, except right move.

Right move meaning the idea, not necessarily the execution. You also have to keep in mind this was the Tampa tank, so they didn't have Barnes yet. Trying to rebuild around Siakam/FVV/OG/Norm would've been very challenging.


But building around siakam/fvv/og/trent is less challenging?

Obviously you wouldn't just stop at trading Norm, the strategy would've been to continue the rebuild by moving out the vets. I tend to think that was loosely the plan until the FO started believing Scottie could be that star.
ATLTimekeeper
RealGM
Posts: 42,591
And1: 23,777
Joined: Apr 28, 2008

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#316 » by ATLTimekeeper » Wed Jan 3, 2024 3:28 pm

CPT wrote:
mdenny wrote:RJ is gonna be a source of hate from casual fans. Free throw attempts aren't reflected in efficiency numbers. Efficiency #s are the love of video game and fantasy league fans. OG could not dribble the ball. RJ can dribble. It's one upside even tho OG is clearly the better player currently. Rj can say "eff it" and bully his way into the paint.


Casual has been called.

I see it the other way around. Casuals are going to drink the TSN/Sportsnet Kool-aid that he was the prize of this trade. They might turn on him if he doesn't live up to that hype though. Casuals don't typically know about advanced stats.

Maybe by casual you mean Blog Boys?


I think there's a tendency with Blog Boys to underrate scoring, like a vestige of all those anti-Iverson arguments. In terms of RJ, just because you're worse at something you do a lot than most of the players that do it a lot, it doesn't mean you're so bad that you shouldn't be doing it. Worse is relative. You wouldn't want Stanley Johnson or OG hurtling to the rim that much, because the results would be catastrophic and not merely below average.

Ultimately, OG to me is one of the best 3&D players in the league, and those players tend to get 2 middling FRPs at best. That's sort of what the Raptors got in return, but with live rotation players instead of the uncertainty of the draft picks.
sbsat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,564
And1: 6,175
Joined: Jan 03, 2014

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#317 » by sbsat » Wed Jan 3, 2024 3:40 pm

GIZMO wrote:
sbsat wrote:
GIZMO wrote:I never understood the Norm trade. We didn’t want to pay Norm just so you can have the luxury to overpay Gary, who does nothing better than Norm. I know about potential and that’s why they did it but it doesn’t make sense imo.


Potential is exactly why they did it. Do you remember gtj had a stretch of 5 games in a row where he scored 30+ points? Do you remember the season where he was menace with steals? This guy flashed a lot of potential it just didnt pan out.

Do you remember 13 game Bargnani, he was oozing potential too.
Too many teams pay an absurd amount for potential that amount to nothing!


Hindsight is 20/20. The point is he flashed enough to take a flier on him and the hope was hed pan out to something better. Ppl on here want to act like geniuses using 20/20 vision but the logic of making the deal made some sense
User avatar
Hero_Panda
Veteran
Posts: 2,522
And1: 3,996
Joined: Oct 15, 2015
Location: SHINE ON!
   

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#318 » by Hero_Panda » Wed Jan 3, 2024 3:47 pm

I'm not down on Barrett like others have posted since I'm not expecting too much from him. Two main things I'm looking for in Barrett:

1. Improved efficiency. I don't expect Barrett to be a first option type of player with 50/40/90 splits that averages 25+ PPG. If he can provide 45/35/80 shooting and be a reliable 2nd/3rd option playing alongside Barnes and Quickley, that'd be a great return.

2. "Bulldog" mentality. A Knick fan provided a very insightful comment regarding Barrett's game, in that he's got a killer mentality that falls short due to his limited skillset. BUT, if that killer mentality can be spread over to Scottie and the rest of the team, it'll come a long way and will certainly reverse the narrative that the Raptors do not have any "bulldogs".
"My life has been full of terrible misfortunes most of which never happened."-Montaigne
"at the Fed level, I'm a libertarian; state level, Republican; local level, Democrat; family and friends level, a socialist."-G & V Graham
User avatar
Boogie!
RealGM
Posts: 68,415
And1: 57,534
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Ba da da da daaaaaa. If you build it, they will come!
Contact:
   

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#319 » by Boogie! » Wed Jan 3, 2024 4:59 pm

sbsat wrote:
GIZMO wrote:
Boogie! wrote:
But building around siakam/fvv/og/trent is less challenging?

I never understood the Norm trade. We didn’t want to pay Norm just so you can have the luxury to overpay Gary, who does nothing better than Norm. I know about potential and that’s why they did it but it doesn’t make sense imo.


Potential is exactly why they did it. Do you remember gtj had a stretch of 5 games in a row where he scored 30+ points? Do you remember the season where he was menace with steals? This guy flashed a lot of potential it just didnt pan out.


Go find the original thread when the trade happened and look at what I said about Gary back then. Anyone who understands skill sets would've seen thst gary was limited from the get go. The guy had no potential other than be a streaky shooter. His best case scenario was he could start shooting at higher efficiency. Other than that nothing in his skillset showed more than him being a volume shooter.
mdenny wrote:In anycase....Masai is probably gonna make Fred the first active player/head coach in franchise history now that Nurse is out of the way. That's been the plan all along.
User avatar
Boogie!
RealGM
Posts: 68,415
And1: 57,534
Joined: Oct 27, 2005
Location: Ba da da da daaaaaa. If you build it, they will come!
Contact:
   

Re: Official RJ Barrett Thread 

Post#320 » by Boogie! » Wed Jan 3, 2024 5:01 pm

sbsat wrote:
GIZMO wrote:
sbsat wrote:
Potential is exactly why they did it. Do you remember gtj had a stretch of 5 games in a row where he scored 30+ points? Do you remember the season where he was menace with steals? This guy flashed a lot of potential it just didnt pan out.

Do you remember 13 game Bargnani, he was oozing potential too.
Too many teams pay an absurd amount for potential that amount to nothing!


Hindsight is 20/20. The point is he flashed enough to take a flier on him and the hope was hed pan out to something better. Ppl on here want to act like geniuses using 20/20 vision but the logic of making the deal made some sense


Nope no hindsight logic, again pull up the original thread I told everyone exactly who gary was. Said the same thing about og when people thought he was the next kawhi.

Barrett has more potential than trent and yet everyone here talks about him like he's capped out. I'm glad we got quickley but I've also not given up on Barrett. He's 23 and much like Barnes is a consistent jumper away from being great. He already has good footwork and strength around the basket and can get to the line. Again kind of like a young demar.
mdenny wrote:In anycase....Masai is probably gonna make Fred the first active player/head coach in franchise history now that Nurse is out of the way. That's been the plan all along.

Return to Toronto Raptors