UN-Owen wrote:garbagnani wrote:UN-Owen wrote:The "right" decision would've been to trade down, acquire an additional asset and then take Ross a little closer to his projected draft slot
Taking Ross at #8 wasn't maximizing the value of the pick -- which another poster articulated earlier in the thread
How do you know that taking Ross wasn't Maximizing value for the pick? He could end up the best player available at 8. Had we traded down he might not of been available. you are talking about projected draft slots based on Draftexpress etc. You have no idea where actual GM's projected Ross to be drafted.
In theory, any player that was available at #8 could wind up being the best player in the draft
Does that mean you would defend BC had he drafted Andrew Nicholson?
It would depend on where actual GMS ranked Nicholson. Based on actual draft position (19) it would have been a huge reach, and waste of value. If we wanted Nicholson we should trade down.
We have no idea where T.Ross would have been drafted had we not selected him 8th. Can't use internet mock drafts (where he slated around 14th) as a means to determine where TRoss would have been drafted..




























