Dr Mufasa wrote:I know he's the hate item here but I'm betting on Montiejunas ending up better than most of the other players in the top 25. This reminds me a bit of the Budinger hate which ended up pretty unfounded
He is IMO the 3rd most talented prospect. Defense and effort concerns are real. But I don't know if the reason Bargnani isn't a star is effort. I think he has serious flaws in his talent base. He can't really jump, has horrible rebounding instincts, has a crappy lower body strength. Most importantly I think the fact that he played SF so long really killed him instincts wise. I think Bargs had star talent and weak mental strength, he would still be a lot better than he is now. He'd still be a 20 PER player
Montiejunas has star talent. The effort might not be there but his skill and size alone may be enough to make him a big name player. He's more comparable to Pau in style than Bargnani to me and I'd take him over Jonas any day
wrong place to place rationale in.
i agree with you in most parts. this is sad because he could have come to toronto if things would have gone a different way (no bargnani) and could of been a fan favorite easily.
just because two players are comparable doesn't mean they're mirror clones of each other. i would have liked donatas to be a raptor, but with bargnani there isn't enough space.
besides that, a lot of people are mentioning that they played/playing in the same ball club? are you serious that's your argument?