ImageImageImageImageImage

[Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m

Moderators: HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, DG88

User avatar
Tha Cynic
RealGM
Posts: 27,859
And1: 30,251
Joined: Jan 03, 2006
Location: Starin' at the world through my rearview
     

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#361 » by Tha Cynic » Mon Dec 8, 2025 5:59 pm

HumbleRen wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
Ah I disagree. Deandre Jordan was a legit rim deterrent. He’d be more than fine at his peak in today’s NBA. His rim deterrence and vertical spacing would pop even more now with all of the spacing and PNR offence we have in today’s NBA.

Jordan would be fine today. Jordan would not be making all-nba teams.

Derrick Lively and Deandre Ayton were able to be starting centers on legit finals teams. Deandre Jordan at his peak was much better than them.
Was it? Jordan was very limited, and propped up fairly heavily by playing with one of the GOAT PG's.

Poeltl will age fine on offence, it’s his defence I’m worried about. His defence peaked on the Spurs. He’s been more of a boon to us on offence than he has been on defence. The gap will only get wider on that end now that he’s 30.
Sure. I don't think it is going to be a massive dropoff. The last year of the deal might be a problem, but it is also non-guaranteed.

There is also no guarantee we keep him for the entire deal.

This isn’t a big deal if we can find a competent back up 7 footer but we can’t count on that with this FO.
You cant count on that for most FO's. Most backup 7 footers are horrible.


Detroit - Duren + Beef Stew
Knicks - KAT + Mitchell Robinson
Orlando - Wendell Carter Jr + Goga
Heat - Bam + Kel Ware
Cavs - Allen + Mobley
Hawks - KP + OO

Our playoff peers seem to be doing just fine with it lol.


I would take any of those bigs over Poeltl and so should everyone eles lol. This team would improve over time with them
Kobe Bryant:You asked for my hustle - I gave you my heart, because it came with so much more."~Kobe #MambaOut
User avatar
Duffman100
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 49,141
And1: 74,611
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
   

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#362 » by Duffman100 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:01 pm

Tha Cynic wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:Jordan would be fine today. Jordan would not be making all-nba teams.

Was it? Jordan was very limited, and propped up fairly heavily by playing with one of the GOAT PG's.

Sure. I don't think it is going to be a massive dropoff. The last year of the deal might be a problem, but it is also non-guaranteed.

There is also no guarantee we keep him for the entire deal.

You cant count on that for most FO's. Most backup 7 footers are horrible.


Detroit - Duren + Beef Stew
Knicks - KAT + Mitchell Robinson
Orlando - Wendell Carter Jr + Goga
Heat - Bam + Kel Ware
Cavs - Allen + Mobley
Hawks - KP + OO

Our playoff peers seem to be doing just fine with it lol.


I would take any of those bigs over Poeltl and so should everyone eles lol. This team would improve over time with them


I don't know about WCJ/Goga. Cheaper obviously, but WCJ has been super injury prone. KP, meh... but OO is looking good.
Image
JB7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 2,097
Joined: Jun 03, 2002

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#363 » by JB7 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:03 pm

HumbleRen wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
Ah I disagree. Deandre Jordan was a legit rim deterrent. He’d be more than fine at his peak in today’s NBA. His rim deterrence and vertical spacing would pop even more now with all of the spacing and PNR offence we have in today’s NBA.

Jordan would be fine today. Jordan would not be making all-nba teams.

Derrick Lively and Deandre Ayton were able to be starting centers on legit finals teams. Deandre Jordan at his peak was much better than them.
Was it? Jordan was very limited, and propped up fairly heavily by playing with one of the GOAT PG's.

Poeltl will age fine on offence, it’s his defence I’m worried about. His defence peaked on the Spurs. He’s been more of a boon to us on offence than he has been on defence. The gap will only get wider on that end now that he’s 30.
Sure. I don't think it is going to be a massive dropoff. The last year of the deal might be a problem, but it is also non-guaranteed.

There is also no guarantee we keep him for the entire deal.

This isn’t a big deal if we can find a competent back up 7 footer but we can’t count on that with this FO.
You cant count on that for most FO's. Most backup 7 footers are horrible.


Detroit - Duren + Beef Stew
Knicks - KAT + Mitchell Robinson
Orlando - Wendell Carter Jr + Goga
Heat - Bam + Kel Ware
Cavs - Allen + Mobley
Hawks - KP + OO

Our playoff peers seem to be doing just fine with it lol.


So would you have been happier if they drafted Maluach or Queen instead of CMB?
kalel123
Head Coach
Posts: 6,632
And1: 4,978
Joined: Oct 19, 2004

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#364 » by kalel123 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:13 pm

JB7 wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:Jordan would be fine today. Jordan would not be making all-nba teams.

Was it? Jordan was very limited, and propped up fairly heavily by playing with one of the GOAT PG's.

Sure. I don't think it is going to be a massive dropoff. The last year of the deal might be a problem, but it is also non-guaranteed.

There is also no guarantee we keep him for the entire deal.

You cant count on that for most FO's. Most backup 7 footers are horrible.


Detroit - Duren + Beef Stew
Knicks - KAT + Mitchell Robinson
Orlando - Wendell Carter Jr + Goga
Heat - Bam + Kel Ware
Cavs - Allen + Mobley
Hawks - KP + OO

Our playoff peers seem to be doing just fine with it lol.


So would you have been happier if they drafted Maluach or Queen instead of CMB?


That's very narrow way of thinking this through considering jury's still out on CMB and the other rookies. I mean, you don't even have to go very far. Look at Ja'Kobe Walter. Why did we need another undersized SG? Heck, why TF did we even need Mogbo with Barnes already here and now so easily rendered useless by CMB?
anotherhomer
Head Coach
Posts: 6,266
And1: 3,722
Joined: Jun 23, 2008

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#365 » by anotherhomer » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:16 pm

i don't have an issue wiht Jakob contract....
he's paid similiar to IH who's excelled at OKC
User avatar
Duffman100
Forum Mod - Raptors
Forum Mod - Raptors
Posts: 49,141
And1: 74,611
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
   

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#366 » by Duffman100 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:33 pm

kalel123 wrote:
JB7 wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
Detroit - Duren + Beef Stew
Knicks - KAT + Mitchell Robinson
Orlando - Wendell Carter Jr + Goga
Heat - Bam + Kel Ware
Cavs - Allen + Mobley
Hawks - KP + OO

Our playoff peers seem to be doing just fine with it lol.


So would you have been happier if they drafted Maluach or Queen instead of CMB?


That's very narrow way of thinking this through considering jury's still out on CMB and the other rookies. I mean, you don't even have to go very far. Look at Ja'Kobe Walter. Why did we need another undersized SG? Heck, why TF did we even need Mogbo with Barnes already here and now so easily rendered useless by CMB?


Sorry, we shouldn't have drafted Mogbo because we knew we'd draft CMB a year later? :D
Image
JB7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 2,097
Joined: Jun 03, 2002

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#367 » by JB7 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:38 pm

Tacoma wrote:
JB7 wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
This is such an unfair take though that just completely disregards context around that trade.

We were SEVEN games below .500 when we made the Poeltl trade, proceeded to get humiliated in the play in game. Devalued our 2023 pick, lost our 2024 pick and let FVV and Poeltl build their value during that cupcake schedule down the stretch of the season.

FVV got the bag and Poeltl got all the leverage over of us. Yay us. Despite all that, we still extended him this recent summer that pays him until 2030 when he’s already peaked age wise.


The team tried to go without a competent C, for a bit, and it led nowhere. They were waiting on Yak, because the Spurs were trying to max out the value they could get in a return. There were not that many decent C's available. And he was a player they trusted. They could not build a team around Scottie without a C.

And in terms of the 2023 draft pick, other than getting lucky in the draft for Wemby (which was not going to happen), who did they miss out on? Maybe Amen. Even then, he is a replica of Scottie. The 2024 draft was known to be weak, and they missed out on Edey? It is hard to build a successful team when you surround your young developing star with rookies...


Not having a starting C was one of Masai's post-2020 big blunders, but the wrong time to fix that blunder was at the 2023 trade deadline to try and make the playoffs from 7 games below .500 with your team buried in 10th place.

And if you recall, we tried hard to tank in 2024 in a failed attempt to be bottom 6 to keep our 2024 pick. If we're building around Barnes, Edey is more in line with Scottie's age and also the better fit with Scottie since he's not a black hole as a shooter like Poeltl. Edey also has good potential and if he isn't better than Poeltl today, he will be soon.

I really don't see much of a debate around whether or not we should've traded for Poeltl at 2023 trade deadline. The point of the trade was to make the playoffs that year and not only did we failed to do so, but we've failed to make the playoffs for every year since that trade.


Everyone presumes that the Poeltl trade at the 2023 trade deadline was about making the playoffs that year because of the timing. I think what people are missing is Masai was interested in Yak in the summer before, but the Spurs asking price was too high (2 FRPs, starting with the 2023 draft). The 2023 trade deadline was the point at which the Spurs had to make a move with Yak, because his contract was expiring that offseason, and the lowest the Raps could get in terms of an offer (2024 FRP, protected 1-6, primarily because they wanted it to convey in that draft, and not in 2025 or 2026 when there were stronger drafts predicted).

Acquiring Yak was about putting a competent veteran C in the lineup, to stabilize the starting lineup on a go forward basis.

The 2023-24 season ended up going south because of the trades (OG & Pascal) combined with other uncontrollable situations (Barnes injuries and the loss of RJ's brother). They probably decided to let it tank to see if they could get lucky with a top 1 or 2 pick. And giving up a better draft pick (#8) wasn't a concern because the draft was so weak, hence the reason the 2024 pick was offered with minimal protections in the first place.

I will be interested to see how Edey's career goes, and whether he can actually play much, and what kind of impact he'll make on the floor (in terms of team success).
JB7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 2,097
Joined: Jun 03, 2002

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#368 » by JB7 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:45 pm

Tha Cynic wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
YogurtProducer wrote:Jordan would be fine today. Jordan would not be making all-nba teams.

Was it? Jordan was very limited, and propped up fairly heavily by playing with one of the GOAT PG's.

Sure. I don't think it is going to be a massive dropoff. The last year of the deal might be a problem, but it is also non-guaranteed.

There is also no guarantee we keep him for the entire deal.

You cant count on that for most FO's. Most backup 7 footers are horrible.


Detroit - Duren + Beef Stew
Knicks - KAT + Mitchell Robinson
Orlando - Wendell Carter Jr + Goga
Heat - Bam + Kel Ware
Cavs - Allen + Mobley
Hawks - KP + OO

Our playoff peers seem to be doing just fine with it lol.


I would take any of those bigs over Poeltl and so should everyone eles lol. This team would improve over time with them


Context matters. The Raps were without a C. Acquiring one, which is difficult in the first place, would have cost a hell of a lot more than the 2024 FRP they gave up for Yak, if they were interested in any of KAT, Bam, Allen, & Mobley. Duren and Ware were unknowns, hence going at the 13th and 15th draft slots. The rest are all comparable in terms of overall impact or worse than Yak.
kalel123
Head Coach
Posts: 6,632
And1: 4,978
Joined: Oct 19, 2004

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#369 » by kalel123 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:49 pm

Duffman100 wrote:
kalel123 wrote:
JB7 wrote:
So would you have been happier if they drafted Maluach or Queen instead of CMB?


That's very narrow way of thinking this through considering jury's still out on CMB and the other rookies. I mean, you don't even have to go very far. Look at Ja'Kobe Walter. Why did we need another undersized SG? Heck, why TF did we even need Mogbo with Barnes already here and now so easily rendered useless by CMB?


Sorry, we shouldn't have drafted Mogbo because we knew we'd draft CMB a year later? :D


We shouldn't have drafted Mogbo because we had bigger need elsewhere and second round is when you can go for the need. It's certainly inadvisable to draft someone that is older with very limited game and ceiling at a position where you have who is very likely your best player when you have other needs and again, the player itself is limited in talent/skills/ceiling. The fact that he got set aside so easily by a rookie the very next year just shows that it was a bad pick.
JB7
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 2,097
Joined: Jun 03, 2002

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#370 » by JB7 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:51 pm

kalel123 wrote:
JB7 wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
Detroit - Duren + Beef Stew
Knicks - KAT + Mitchell Robinson
Orlando - Wendell Carter Jr + Goga
Heat - Bam + Kel Ware
Cavs - Allen + Mobley
Hawks - KP + OO

Our playoff peers seem to be doing just fine with it lol.


So would you have been happier if they drafted Maluach or Queen instead of CMB?


That's very narrow way of thinking this through considering jury's still out on CMB and the other rookies. I mean, you don't even have to go very far. Look at Ja'Kobe Walter. Why did we need another undersized SG? Heck, why TF did we even need Mogbo with Barnes already here and now so easily rendered useless by CMB?


The point some are trying to make is we need a backup C, and those were the two C's considered around the time of the draft, that were in the range of the Raps pick. So, knowing that they only had Yak at C, the cheapest route to fill the need was draft one of them.

I think they probably went with a better choice in CMB, who offers more on the defensive end, while giving up some size, because Queen doesn't really offer anything defensively, while Maluach is not playable right now.

The Raps FO appears to be generally taking the best player available with their picks, which based on their draft record has seemed to work.
User avatar
HumbleRen
RealGM
Posts: 19,650
And1: 26,976
Joined: Jul 02, 2021
 

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#371 » by HumbleRen » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:55 pm

JB7 wrote:
kalel123 wrote:
JB7 wrote:
So would you have been happier if they drafted Maluach or Queen instead of CMB?


That's very narrow way of thinking this through considering jury's still out on CMB and the other rookies. I mean, you don't even have to go very far. Look at Ja'Kobe Walter. Why did we need another undersized SG? Heck, why TF did we even need Mogbo with Barnes already here and now so easily rendered useless by CMB?


The Raps FO appears to be generally taking the best player available with their picks, which based on their draft record has seemed to work.


Maybe a decade ago lol.
Image

sig credits to Clutch0z24
kalel123
Head Coach
Posts: 6,632
And1: 4,978
Joined: Oct 19, 2004

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#372 » by kalel123 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:57 pm

JB7 wrote:
kalel123 wrote:
JB7 wrote:
So would you have been happier if they drafted Maluach or Queen instead of CMB?


That's very narrow way of thinking this through considering jury's still out on CMB and the other rookies. I mean, you don't even have to go very far. Look at Ja'Kobe Walter. Why did we need another undersized SG? Heck, why TF did we even need Mogbo with Barnes already here and now so easily rendered useless by CMB?


The point some are trying to make is we need a backup C, and those were the two C's considered around the time of the draft, that were in the range of the Raps pick. So, knowing that they only had Yak at C, the cheapest route to fill the need was draft one of them.

I think they probably went with a better choice in CMB, who offers more on the defensive end, while giving up some size, because Queen doesn't really offer anything defensively, while Maluach is not playable right now.

The Raps FO appears to be generally taking the best player available with their picks, which based on their draft record has seemed to work.


Huh? Dick's not working out. Walter's not working out. Mogbo's not working out. Need I go on?

The point you are missing is that 2025 draft is not the only draft in existence. They've failed in multiple drafts because they gave picks away, failed to tank properly, and/or failed to draft for need at spots where it is more appropriate to do so.
kalel123
Head Coach
Posts: 6,632
And1: 4,978
Joined: Oct 19, 2004

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#373 » by kalel123 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 6:59 pm

JB7 wrote:
Tha Cynic wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
Detroit - Duren + Beef Stew
Knicks - KAT + Mitchell Robinson
Orlando - Wendell Carter Jr + Goga
Heat - Bam + Kel Ware
Cavs - Allen + Mobley
Hawks - KP + OO

Our playoff peers seem to be doing just fine with it lol.


I would take any of those bigs over Poeltl and so should everyone eles lol. This team would improve over time with them


Context matters. The Raps were without a C. Acquiring one, which is difficult in the first place, would have cost a hell of a lot more than the 2024 FRP they gave up for Yak, if they were interested in any of KAT, Bam, Allen, & Mobley. Duren and Ware were unknowns, hence going at the 13th and 15th draft slots. The rest are all comparable in terms of overall impact or worse than Yak.


I think you are missing the point that all those teams have more than one. We have Yak, his broken back, and no one.
Anticon
General Manager
Posts: 8,340
And1: 5,325
Joined: Dec 16, 2004

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#374 » by Anticon » Mon Dec 8, 2025 7:08 pm

HumbleRen wrote:
JB7 wrote:
HumbleRen wrote:
I said it at the same that the trade would have long term effects that hurt us for the rest of the 2020’s.

It’s not Poeltl’s fault. He’s a fine player. Our FO was just extremely desperate and Poeltl and his agent took full advantage of it.


Because this team without a competent C looks amazing. Oh ya, I forgot, we wanted to tank for all of the 2020's :lol:


This is such an unfair take though that just completely disregards context around that trade.

We were SEVEN games below .500 when we made the Poeltl trade, proceeded to get humiliated in the play in game. Devalued our 2023 pick, lost our 2024 pick and let FVV and Poeltl build their value during that cupcake schedule down the stretch of the season.

FVV got the bag and Poeltl got all the leverage over of us. Yay us. Despite all that, we still extended him this recent summer that pays him until 2030 when he’s already peaked age wise.


There are also always other options than just Poeltl (including Lively, taken one ahead of our 2023 pick that would probably have been higher if not for the choices at that deadline).
ciueli
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,926
And1: 2,899
Joined: Apr 11, 2007

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#375 » by ciueli » Mon Dec 8, 2025 7:34 pm

Yeah, we really need to move on from Jak. My hope is that the Bucks blow it up at the deadline and make Myles Turner available for trade, we could maybe make an offer built around Jak + another player like Gradey Dick or Ja'Kobe for Turner. Probably cost us a future first though, the shooting Turner provides would solve a lot of problems for us right now.
theonlyeastcoastrapsfan
RealGM
Posts: 27,455
And1: 9,445
Joined: Mar 14, 2006
Location: Hotlantic Canada
 

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#376 » by theonlyeastcoastrapsfan » Mon Dec 8, 2025 7:44 pm

Jacob is going to get more expensive in a few years can we expect his health to improve at his age? It's a bit concerning that that there's not been any acute event or thing that happened to his back, lie something to recover from but more wear and tear, but its already been an all season long thing they are trying to manage with minute limitations and load management strategy. Will they ask to skip national team stuff in the off season?
Why would they expect it to get better? They've never actually ever announced that there was a back injury.
tdotrep2
RealGM
Posts: 25,669
And1: 26,785
Joined: May 21, 2011
 

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#377 » by tdotrep2 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 7:56 pm

I think we need to also take into consideration that Jak is clearly dealing with back issues... he does not look the same. I've also voiced my concerns about trading for him but let's not act like his back isn't the main issue right now to justify the position of not wanting him here in the first place.
DelAbbot
RealGM
Posts: 15,664
And1: 22,120
Joined: May 22, 2019
   

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#378 » by DelAbbot » Mon Dec 8, 2025 8:04 pm

tdotrep2 wrote:I think we need to also take into consideration that Jak is clearly dealing with back issues... he does not look the same. I've also voiced my concerns about trading for him but let's not act like his back isn't the main issue right now to justify the position of not wanting him here in the first place.


We are not "justify(ing) the position of not wanting him here"

We are debating the merits of handing him, in the summer of him turning 30, an extension for his age 32,33,34 age seasons for 27M+ each, given his bball skill limitations and risk of decline in health (back). The only way this makes sense is if we are title contending this season and next season like the Blue Jays, where to secure his production near term, we overpay (adjusted for health risk) in the distant future seasons. But we are not contending this season for the finals.
DelAbbot
RealGM
Posts: 15,664
And1: 22,120
Joined: May 22, 2019
   

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#379 » by DelAbbot » Mon Dec 8, 2025 8:09 pm

PushDaRock wrote:
DelAbbot wrote:
PushDaRock wrote:
Was he a 30m a year player the last 2 seasons? Probably not?


He was paid about 20m a year last 2 seasons, for his age 28 and 29 seasons. And that was a very valuable contract for his production at those age.

Poeltl is about to get 27m a year for his age 32,33 and 34 seasons, and he's already having back problems, which are most likely recurring for big men.


Should we be counting the value of the total extension or just the last 2 seasons because they were able to frontload?


Yes, because when Turner re-negotiated in 2022/2023, the frontloaded salary was neither positively nor negatively contributing to contention - because they were not contending in 2022/2023. Whereas in the 2023/2024 and more importantly 2024/2025, they were contending and thus the lower Turned AAV in those years helped with putting a better team on the court for contention.

Now, Poeltl on the other hand is making a good-value (when healthy) 19M this year and next year, when we are not expected to be contending. But if we were to contend in 2027 onwards, the diminished Poeltl will be here at a high AAV of 27M+, eating up cap space that could be used for other improvements on the court. Bobby screwed up what he's known for - salary cap management.
tdotrep2
RealGM
Posts: 25,669
And1: 26,785
Joined: May 21, 2011
 

Re: [Charania] Jakob Extended - 4 Years $104m 

Post#380 » by tdotrep2 » Mon Dec 8, 2025 8:20 pm

DelAbbot wrote:
tdotrep2 wrote:I think we need to also take into consideration that Jak is clearly dealing with back issues... he does not look the same. I've also voiced my concerns about trading for him but let's not act like his back isn't the main issue right now to justify the position of not wanting him here in the first place.


We are not "justify(ing) the position of not wanting him here"

We are debating the merits of handing him, in the summer of him turning 30, an extension for his age 32,33,34 age seasons for 27M+ each, given his bball skill limitations and risk of decline in health (back). The only way this makes sense is if we are title contending this season and next season like the Blue Jays, where to secure his production near term, we overpay (adjusted for health risk) in the distant future seasons. But we are not contending this season for the finals.

What was the alternative? His back was fine at the time as well. Say we let him walk... we now have no center, lost a pick for nothing and go into this season trying to compete. The main issues stemmed from delaying a rebuild and trading for him, once we did are hands we're tied. It's possible we could have let him test his market value and matched but that was a risk.

Return to Toronto Raptors