#13 for Fernandez+#22 (Deal dead, pg. 26)

Post #41 » by **The Duke** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:11 am

Ouch... dont like.

But this is a Colangelo move

Rapsobsessed7 · Post #42 » by **Rapsobsessed7** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:12 am

wow, i see so much hate.

IF our player is at #22 (Bradley, Bledsoe, George, Alabi, Whiteside even) then WHY THE **** NOT? You pick up an asset for free. Hell you could probably flip him after for a pick.

HeirCanada10 · Post #43 » by **HeirCanada10** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:12 am

NO chance i do that just horrible we got enough wings!

Indeed · Post #44 » by **Indeed** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:13 am

If we trade for Rudy (which I believe he can play the point), then we will be drafting Ebanks at #22 instead of Bradley.

mowcrowbar · Post #45 » by **mowcrowbar** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:13 am

if this goes through, ill be all over the firing of colangelo

sh00n · Post #46 » by **sh00n** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:13 am

kingz32 wrote:
KenPiffilousIII wrote:bc still on the european tip

This European lust BC has is really getting out of hand. This deal would set the organization back for a number of years.

Please. Don't exaggerate.

IntricateOh25 · Post #47 » by **IntricateOh25** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:14 am

Rapsobsessed7 wrote:wow, i see so much hate.

IF our player is at #22 (Bradley, Bledsoe, George, Alabi, Whiteside even) then WHY THE **** NOT? You pick up an asset for free. Hell you could probably flip him after for a pick.

But it's a tough situation. We'd have to select for the Blazers at 13 and hope someone slips to 22 that we like?

danny-callahan · Post #48 » by **danny-callahan** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:14 am

This is such a Colangelo move. Not because Rudy is Spanish, but because of the way he approaches the game.

I can see BC talking to media already..."We've always liked Rudy. He has excellent playmaking ability, spreads the floor, hits big shots.."

Ugh. Just develop Marco. There is absolutely no need for this.

jsmith · Post #49 » by **jsmith** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:14 am

i would pick my top two guys at 13 and if they are gone, flip the pick quickly to portland

by the time you are getting down to the 3rd or 4th man on your draft board at 13, fernandez becomes a more viable option because the 3rd and 4th choice may be available at 22 anyways

EventHorizon · Post #50 » by **EventHorizon** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:14 am

I like Rudy but he would be truly redundant here. Avery Bradley at least has all-star potential.

overdose · Post #51 » by **overdose** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:14 am

hopefully bigger and better things are being discussed

ash_k · Post #52 » by **ash_k** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:14 am

Rudy complained about PT all year.
Just imagine him with Weems, Belinelli, DD
But he s a valued-asset(for trades down the road) I would do it

dagger · Post #53 » by **dagger** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:14 am

HeirCanada10 wrote:NO chance i do that just horrible we got enough wings!

We have DD, Weems, and... Belinelli is expiring and can be packaged with out other expirings. Turk is on the block. Wrignt is gonzo.

Too many wings? Really?

DD420 · Post #54 » by **DD420** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:15 am

another european...jus wut we need,, ,,,,rudy : overrated

A_wildstabatanything · Post #55 » by **A_wildstabatanything** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:15 am

Fernandez threatened to go back to Europe because he wasn't getting enough PT in Portland. What's he going to do here with DeRozan & Weems gunning for those minutes?

Rapsobsessed7 · Post #56 » by **Rapsobsessed7** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:15 am

TankCity32 wrote:
Rapsobsessed7 wrote:wow, i see so much hate.

IF our player is at #22 (Bradley, Bledsoe, George, Alabi, Whiteside even) then WHY THE **** NOT? You pick up an asset for free. Hell you could probably flip him after for a pick.

But it's a tough situation. We'd have to select for the Blazers at 13 and hope someone slips to 22 that we like?

no we hold off until we see whos available. The draft is so many hours away that i bet the talks went like this. The basis being #13 for Rudy + #22 and then obviously someone is waiting to do it or it would be done already. So obviously if its going to happen on draft day than its because #22 is there and we like him.

Avenger · Post #57 » by **Avenger** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:15 am

Fernandez>>>>pick 22 - pick 13, this should be a no brainer in this draft

and i'm really not a fan of Fernandez at all.

Mr.Raptorsingh · Post #58 » by **Mr.Raptorsingh** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:15 am

If we get a big like Alabi or Seraphin at 22, wouldn't you guys take it? Forget about Rudy Fernandez for a second...thing of him as a sweetner. This is because I really think the Raps like Alabi better than any other big at 13.

Rapsobsessed7 · Post #59 » by **Rapsobsessed7** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:16 am

A_wildstabatanything wrote:Fernandez threatened to go back to Europe because he wasn't getting enough PT in Portland. What's he going to do here with DeRozan & Weems gunning for those minutes?

you do know between SG and SF theres 96 minutes to go around, right? Man i swear some people on this board are CLUELESS.

Post #60 » by **Maritimer** » Thu Jun 24, 2010 1:16 am

A_wildstabatanything wrote:Fernandez threatened to go back to Europe because he wasn't getting enough PT in Portland. What's he going to do here with DeRozan & Weems gunning for those minutes?

Those two combine for 48 minutes a night, tops. I think there's room for minutes.