OT- Heat Players might be Getting in some trouble.....

[TheRaptor!]

Big ups to Ricky Davis! Get 'em while they're fresh!

those hoes are anything BUT fresh.

[some_rand]

lol last ppic is so funny

[Tha Cynic]

The girls sure don't look like "victims" or "accusers".

[Danchan]

Yes.


Just like if you tell a bartender that you are 19 and he serves you drinks without asking for proof.

what if they had fake ID. McLovin... hehe classic.

[The_Critic]

Those pics remind me of the episode of the Mad Real World sketch on Chappelle Show Season 1. For the sake of arguement we'll say Haslem is Tyreik and Davis can be Lysol.

[torontoaces04]

Time to hire R. Kelly's lawyers.

+ 1

[from24ft]

The girls sure don't look like "victims" or "accusers".

I don't know what a victim is supposed to look like.

Those girls weren't suggesting anything sexual in their poses. Naivety, yes, and that is totally expected considering their age. Teenagers naturally idolize famous people. If anything there seems to be an obvious sign of drinking with minors.


With regards to the fake ID, I think the bartender would have better luck with that defence than someone who committed statutory rape.

[That Other Guy]

Duhon
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/170/415645070_0f522c9083.jpg?v=0
Harry Palmer's mancrush
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/175/415645292_28af896c45.jpg?v=0
and the Baconator himself
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/187/416020896_31860b78b8.jpg?v=0

Found this link to a whole album of these pics from the Bucks board.

[pierrot]

-= original quote snipped =-
Yes.

Just like if you tell a bartender that you are 19 and he serves you drinks without asking for proof.

That's overly simplistic. The analogy isn't so good because the bartender is subject to the duties and liabilities laid out in the bar's liquor license. Also, the bartender won't be charged under the criminal law, he'll be charged under the liquor control act, so the burden of proof is much lower.

The bartender can be liable even where he honestly believed that the person in question was over age ... all that matters is that he served a minor.

On the other hand, in the criminal law an honestly held mistake is usually a defence. Even a completely unreasonable mistake about someone's age could be a defence if the judge/jury believed that the defendant was honestly mistaken.

The judge/jury might say that the defendant should have investigated further, but on the other hand they might not. The outcome still very much depends on the circumstances of the case, the persuasiveness of the lawyers, and of course the sentiments of judge or jury.

It also really varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction ... the law in Florida is different from the law in Canada. In some jurisdictions there is no mistake of fact available for statutory rape, but in Canada there is (which I assume we're talking about since that's where most of us are from), and I'm pretty sure there is in most American jurisdictions (the criminal law varies state by state in America).

-= original quote snipped =-
With regards to the fake ID, I think the bartender would have better luck with that defence than someone who committed statutory rape..

Actually the bartender will be convicted with much greater ease, for a number of reasons ... but on the other hand, the bartender is facing a fine, not jailtime.

[wade2bosh]

The girls said they were old enough. And the players believed em. Simple.

PS - LOL

[YogiStewart]

they did nothing wrong.




other than having pictures taken (that were then posted on the internet).
and other than hanging with wee little girls.
and other than hanging with incredibly fugly girls.


otherwise, what's wrong with this picture?

[La princesa]

Instead of ****ing underaged girls they should be focusing and finding out how crap there team really is

[theonlyeastcoastrapsfan]

they did nothing wrong.




other than having pictures taken (that were then posted on the internet).
and other than hanging with wee little girls.
and other than hanging with incredibly fugly girls.


otherwise, what's wrong with this picture?

those girls were young, but I would not say they were fugly.

[La princesa]

they did nothing wrong.




and other than hanging with incredibly fugly girls.


otherwise, what's wrong with this picture?

[will]

I quite fancy the filipina girl in the middle there

[YogiStewart]

I quite fancy the filipina girl in the middle there

all of the girls look so ghetto. the sequined hats? hoods on their heads?

there also is little that's appealing about the girls. they either look like men, look like men in drag or they clearly have 15-year-old girl bodies.

so what part is it that you like. no matter what, you lose.

or you gain herpes.

HERPES!

[bychai]

-= original quote snipped =-



all of the girls look so ghetto. the sequined hats? hoods on their heads?

there also is little that's appealing about the girls. they either look like men, look like men in drag or they clearly have 15-year-old girl bodies.

so what part is it that you like. no matter what, you lose.

or you gain herpes.

HERPES!

Look "ghetto"? Hoods on their heads?

That's some ignorant sh** right there.

[jonny three time]

A few years ago the age of consent in Ontario was actually 14, I'm not even joking. Since then Ontario has raised it to 16. But every province and state has their own age of consent laws so you have to do your homework if your travelling.

I know this because I used to travel a lot in my late teens and early twenties and its good know the sex laws and marijauna laws of each state/province your in.

[grimlock]

The girls said they were old enough. And the players believed em. Simple.

PS - LOL

Lol.. try that excuse in court

[bychai]

I know this because I used to travel a lot in my late teens and early twenties and its good know the sex laws and marijauna laws of each state/province your in.

I like that jonny three time.