mtcan wrote:ItsDanger wrote:Lavine had his knee issues and possible decline, Chicago extended him anyways to "retain the asset". Siakam has his age (turns 30 next month) and possible decline, people here want to extend him in the offseason regardless. The back end risk in the 4th or 5th years especially are often ignored. No team wants an empty calorie scorer being paid $50M at that point.
If he is resigned the key is to not wait to trade him. As soon as he is eligible for trade...pull the trigger.
If they include the 5th year on the extension, that could hurt his value. For other teams, if its a 4 year deal then its a wash.





























