SharoneWright wrote:Let's be honest. While grateful for what Masai has done, this was an Emeritus contract. It's to honour Masai's past work and keep up our perceived prestige in the league. If that prestige doesn't translate to free agent signings, then the contract is a fail. There's still plenty of chance for that to happen, but it certainly doesn't seem like a slam dunk. Additionally, Masai has been pretty clear that his interests are very divided if not completely elsewhere. We gave him the candy store while allowing him to shop around. Good for him. He's a good negotiator. But Ed has a right to be skeptical. That said, ultimately, I would have given Masai the bag too. He's pretty iconic and is reassuring to fans and investors.
not at all.
1) Masai is being paid for what he will do not what he has done. However, a good way (but not the only way) to know what someone you are hiring will do is to look at what they have done in a similar role in the past. In Masai's case that includes:
increasing the value of the company he works for by $500m
winning his franchise's first ever world championship
radically changing the perception of his franchise for the better across the city, the country, the league and the world
leading with absolute integrity a team that has been virtually scandal and issue-free for 7 years
to name just a few
2) Masai has not been clear that his interests are divided. on the contrary he has made it clear again and again that he is absolutely committed to this team and this city, even though like many people he has broad interests and investments
3) his success or failure in the future will not be determined by his ability to sign big name free agents, but by:
- playoff success and titles won
- good trades and drafting and player development
- increased profitability
- increased franchise value
Masai has a stellar track record in all these things and Ed has no reason whatsoever to be skeptical, apart from being a born prick