ImageImageImageImageImage

Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

Twinkie defense
RealGM
Posts: 20,681
And1: 1,707
Joined: Jul 15, 2005

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#481 » by Twinkie defense » Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:37 pm

So if the season gets cancelled does that mean the next draft will follow the same order? Hmmmm...
User avatar
ranger001
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 26,938
And1: 3,752
Joined: Feb 23, 2001
   

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#482 » by ranger001 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:40 pm

bboyskinnylegs wrote:
ranger001 wrote:I'd rather they come back after half a season than suffer through another tanking season.

I'm worried about suffering through a tanking season only to see a new age limit implemented under a new CBA. The benefits of tanking are greatly diminished if we're stuck hoping for Barnes at the top, with Perry Jones, Terrence Jones, Sullinger, Jeremy Lamb, and Thomas Robinson (who only today suffered an injury I believe) as the only other real options. Taking guys like Drummond/Davis/Miller/Gilchrist/Kabongo/Wroten/Rivers/Teague/Beal/A.Thomas out of the mix will really impact the quality and depth of this draft.

I had an idea on this. What if freshmen could only be drafted in the 2nd round? Would that make it too lopsided for lottery teams? I think it would increase parity quickly though. And most freshmen would stay longer if they are lottery quality.
Ponchos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 4,775
Joined: Jul 04, 2010

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#483 » by Ponchos » Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:42 pm

ranger001 wrote:Suppose NFL stadiums where horrendously expensive to maintain compared to NBA stadiums. Then if revenues were similar 52% in the NFL wouldn't be the same as 52% in the NBA.


Yep I get that. I disagree on the facts of your example but it doesn't really matter for my point, so I'll give it to you (can't compare NFL to NBA).

How about the NHL? Exactly the same number of games, in regular season and playoffs. Exactly the same type of arenas (Often shared between the NBA and NHL).

So why is 53%-57% ok for the NHL but not the NBA?
User avatar
Coach Smiley
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,060
And1: 980
Joined: Jun 30, 2009
 

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#484 » by Coach Smiley » Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:50 pm

the score ran on their ticker all afternoon that a deal would be done today, bastards :x
User avatar
J-Roc
RealGM
Posts: 33,150
And1: 7,553
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Sunnyvale
       

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#485 » by J-Roc » Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:56 pm

Hallelujah!! Talks broken down. Let's get a different system. Something tangibly different.

And don't worry about age limits Raptor fans. Our GM is good at sending out teams who finish near the bottom. We can keep Andrea as our starting C for a few more seasons yet! Other teams don't have that.
Ponchos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 4,775
Joined: Jul 04, 2010

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#486 » by Ponchos » Fri Oct 28, 2011 9:59 pm

J-Roc wrote:Hallelujah!! Talks broken down. Let's get a different system. Something tangibly different.

And don't worry about age limits Raptor fans. Our GM is good at sending out teams who finish near the bottom. We can keep Andrea as our starting C for a few more seasons yet! Other teams don't have that.


Do you really honestly believe that talks breaking down improves the chances at a "different system"?

Really?
User avatar
J-Roc
RealGM
Posts: 33,150
And1: 7,553
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Sunnyvale
       

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#487 » by J-Roc » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:01 pm

Ponchos wrote:
J-Roc wrote:Hallelujah!! Talks broken down. Let's get a different system. Something tangibly different.

And don't worry about age limits Raptor fans. Our GM is good at sending out teams who finish near the bottom. We can keep Andrea as our starting C for a few more seasons yet! Other teams don't have that.


Do you really honestly believe that talks breaking down improves the chances at a "different system"?

Really?


In case you're still not sure.....yes.
Ponchos
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,553
And1: 4,775
Joined: Jul 04, 2010

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#488 » by Ponchos » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:05 pm

J-Roc wrote:
Ponchos wrote:
J-Roc wrote:Hallelujah!! Talks broken down. Let's get a different system. Something tangibly different.

And don't worry about age limits Raptor fans. Our GM is good at sending out teams who finish near the bottom. We can keep Andrea as our starting C for a few more seasons yet! Other teams don't have that.


Do you really honestly believe that talks breaking down improves the chances at a "different system"?

Really?


In case you're still not sure.....yes.


Reality has bad news for you then.
I_Like_Dirt
RealGM
Posts: 36,063
And1: 9,442
Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Location: Boardman gets paid!

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#489 » by I_Like_Dirt » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:08 pm

I had an idea on this. What if freshmen could only be drafted in the 2nd round? Would that make it too lopsided for lottery teams? I think it would increase parity quickly though. And most freshmen would stay longer if they are lottery quality.


I think that's pretty much an age limit in and of itself. I think the only players who would leave as a freshmen at this point would be the horribly raw ones who had burned out their college coaches with their antics who just wanted to leave college and head to the NBA even if it meant sacrificing a bunch of money. Isn't the whole point of the age limit to keep those the kinds of players out of the league until they've matured a little?
Bucket! Bucket!
User avatar
J-Roc
RealGM
Posts: 33,150
And1: 7,553
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Sunnyvale
       

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#490 » by J-Roc » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:43 pm

WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Stern confirms NBA schedule is cancelled through November 30th.
12 minutes ago Favorite Retweet Reply


:clap: :bowdown:
User avatar
Orsk
Pro Prospect
Posts: 959
And1: 444
Joined: Jul 23, 2010

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#491 » by Orsk » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:45 pm

In my opinion the players union just continue to look worse and worse. The NBA admits that the current system doesn't work, is trying to come up with something to make the league more competitive and by default more entertaining and are simply trying to get a better return on the huge, risky investments as any business should.

The players on the other hand simply want to get paid the most money they possibly can with the most possible destinations they can possibly get. The Union doesn't give a rats about the fans who actually make it possible for them to play, or the league that organizes for them to play, or even the competitiveness of the league - considering every superstar says "I just want to win". I call BS. I hope the owners lock them out until next June.
Image
User avatar
J-Roc
RealGM
Posts: 33,150
And1: 7,553
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Sunnyvale
       

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#492 » by J-Roc » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:53 pm

People like to say that Owners can decide how much to pay players. They don't. GM's do. And GM's are just like coaches, trying to save their hide by making bold moves to build winning teams. If they spend too much....oh well, they get fired and move to the next team.

The reason a better system is needed is so that GM's can be held in check. So that "market value" is redefined as something that can let an owner go to sleep at night. There is no real advantage to fans for players to have a strong union. But there *could* be an advantage to fans for the union to be broken once and for all.

And since the Raptors truly suck donkey balls these days and for the forseeable future, might as well do it now.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,381
And1: 14,429
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#493 » by dagger » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:54 pm

Orsk wrote:In my opinion the players union just continue to look worse and worse. The NBA admits that the current system doesn't work, is trying to come up with something to make the league more competitive and by default more entertaining and are simply trying to get a better return on the huge, risky investments as any business should.

The players on the other hand simply want to get paid the most money they possibly can with the most possible destinations they can possibly get. The Union doesn't give a rats about the fans who actually make it possible for them to play, or the league that organizes for them to play, or even the competitiveness of the league - considering every superstar says "I just want to win". I call BS. I hope the owners lock them out until next June.


I don't blame the union's approach, just that as an old labour negotiator myself, I know that there is a time to fold em. As my old labour boss used to say, you are paid to make tough decisions, or as he put it, "It's time to shiat or get off the pot."
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
J-Roc
RealGM
Posts: 33,150
And1: 7,553
Joined: Aug 02, 2008
Location: Sunnyvale
       

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#494 » by J-Roc » Fri Oct 28, 2011 10:57 pm

Keep in mind folks, a lot of the media rhetoric you'll hear now will be from people who are trying to save their own jobs. So the media will make it sound like the player or the owners should just give in, their so close, etc, etc.

The truth is that if either side is not happy, and if they think they can withstand the consequences, they should stand strong, as they're doing now.
User avatar
Indeed
RealGM
Posts: 21,746
And1: 3,625
Joined: Aug 21, 2009

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#495 » by Indeed » Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:00 pm

dagger wrote:
Orsk wrote:In my opinion the players union just continue to look worse and worse. The NBA admits that the current system doesn't work, is trying to come up with something to make the league more competitive and by default more entertaining and are simply trying to get a better return on the huge, risky investments as any business should.

The players on the other hand simply want to get paid the most money they possibly can with the most possible destinations they can possibly get. The Union doesn't give a rats about the fans who actually make it possible for them to play, or the league that organizes for them to play, or even the competitiveness of the league - considering every superstar says "I just want to win". I call BS. I hope the owners lock them out until next June.


I don't blame the union's approach, just that as an old labour negotiator myself, I know that there is a time to fold em. As my old labour boss used to say, you are paid to make tough decisions, or as he put it, "It's time to shiat or get off the pot."


Indeed, but union is not looking at money, they seem to be looking at contract length, which hurts the competitive of each team (bad contracts). The union could target young players or development teams to provide more talents and expansion for basketball itself, instead of focusing on middle class players.
dagger
RealGM
Posts: 41,381
And1: 14,429
Joined: Aug 19, 2002
         

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#496 » by dagger » Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:11 pm

J-Roc wrote:Keep in mind folks, a lot of the media rhetoric you'll hear now will be from people who are trying to save their own jobs. So the media will make it sound like the player or the owners should just give in, their so close, etc, etc.


I often disagree with you, but I think you are right here. bloggers are the most insecure because most of them have no fallback.

Today's cancellations cover three more home games: Boston, Milwaukee and Phoenix.
2019 will never be forgotten because FLAGS FLY FOREVER
User avatar
dd2410
Junior
Posts: 314
And1: 0
Joined: Jun 28, 2009

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#497 » by dd2410 » Fri Oct 28, 2011 11:59 pm

Stephen A Smith reported on ESPN radio that Fisher and Kobe are willing to accept 50%, while other players (KG & Pierce) would not
User avatar
C Court
RealGM
Posts: 39,824
And1: 26,949
Joined: Nov 07, 2005
Location: Toronto
       

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#498 » by C Court » Sat Oct 29, 2011 12:06 am

The players holding out for 52% is not a good bargaining stance at this point. They have to move to 51% or 50% to get a deal. The owners can out wait the players and will.
NBA Champion Toronto Raptors
Hassassin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,431
And1: 1,608
Joined: Aug 14, 2003
Location: Etobicoke
Contact:
 

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#499 » by Hassassin » Sat Oct 29, 2011 12:15 am

dd2410 wrote:Stephen A Smith reported on ESPN radio that Fisher and Kobe are willing to accept 50%, while other players (KG & Pierce) would not


Another reason to hate the Celtics
User avatar
ronleroy
Pro Prospect
Posts: 839
And1: 86
Joined: Jan 09, 2011
Location: Liniverse

Re: Official CBA/Labour Talks Discussion Thread II 

Post#500 » by ronleroy » Sat Oct 29, 2011 12:25 am

well, we don't know where smith is getting his info from, throwing kobe out of no where.
Jeremy Lin > Spartacus

Return to Toronto Raptors