ImageImageImageImageImage

Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II

Moderators: DG88, niQ, Duffman100, tsherkin, Reeko, lebron stopper, HiJiNX, 7 Footer, Morris_Shatford

grant101
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,469
And1: 1,078
Joined: Feb 04, 2022
 

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#481 » by grant101 » Tue Feb 28, 2023 9:02 pm

Dalek wrote:
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:Cam Whitmore on the Raptors seems like a move we'd make if we traded Pascal and committed to rebuilding. I don't see him as a guy that will have immediate impact because there are a lot of areas he needs to refine to be a good player. Not to say we're gonna draft based on need, but considering we only have 1 pick this year and none next year I think we're gonna be safer in our pick with a high floor, decently high ceiling guy (JHS, Hendricks)


I am not sure what you see as missing for Cam Whitmore, but maybe you have dove more deeply into him as a prospect.

From what I have watched, he is a very good defender with NBA size and strength. Not sure where Yahoo got its measurements, but ESPN and others have him at 230 lbs. I think at worst he is 220 lbs. and 6'7. Very OG like for his frame and defensive agility:

Read on Twitter


The dunks look like college OG, too:

Read on Twitter


The outside shot is going to be fine from the corners and given the bad spacing on Villanova, I am not surprised about his 33% from three. His off-the dribble game looks pretty solid and he loves taking contact at the rim. To me, him and Walker are the two most Raptor-type players who I could see being plugged into the bench right away. Whitmore only lacks passing skill, but to me he is in the top tier of picks in the this class.


Completely agree. If we somehow manage to walk away with Cam in the middle of the first, I'm doing backflips!. He will undoubtedly take time to become a productive on-ball weapon in the league, but his defence and athleticism buys him minutes on the court. You grab him and worry about fit later.
Yallbecrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,855
And1: 5,534
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#482 » by Yallbecrazy » Tue Feb 28, 2023 9:44 pm

https://deanondraft.com/2023/02/08/2023-draft-mid-season-board/

Bit of a contrarian take here,I've posted some of his stuff before and the guy who wrote it is pretty anti social so don't go reading into his non basketball posts, but he is a stats nerd who also likes to watch film and compare archetypes of players to other NBA guys and then look at their stats in college as a comparison. I love reading his scouting takes (his other stuff is fairly painful) and his big boards tend to be significantly better at predicting NBA success than the Ford's, ESPN, NBA draftnet, etc. which all tend to regurgitate each other.

This was posted several weeks ago, but it gives a good insight into certain prospects and why to be higher on them or lower.

Things I don't understand, he spends the whole time crapping on Nick Smith in his write up, and nearly his whole write up praising Brandin Podziemski, yet puts Smith one spot above Brandin. There's a few others where I don't understand the ranking vs writing.
I'm quite a bit lower on Kyle F. and Cason Wallace, while much higher on Brandin.
User avatar
BoyzNTheHood
Head Coach
Posts: 7,220
And1: 6,813
Joined: Apr 19, 2015

Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#483 » by BoyzNTheHood » Tue Feb 28, 2023 9:52 pm

Psubs wrote:
BoyzNTheHood wrote:
Psubs wrote:
If he's such a beast, why doesn't he get to the FT line? :reporter:

Being a foul merchant doesn’t make you a beast.


Fair enough. TS% of .540.... Taylor Hendricks is .597.

I think Walker will be Isaiah Stewart with better handles.


Sir, I’m the original Taylor Hendricks bandwagon driver. I just think Jarace is better.
deeps6x wrote:I guarantee you that (Jaylen) Brown and (Kris) Dunn are drafted OUT of the top 5.
Dalek
RealGM
Posts: 13,877
And1: 10,677
Joined: Jan 24, 2005
Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
 

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#484 » by Dalek » Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:31 pm

Yallbecrazy wrote:https://deanondraft.com/2023/02/08/2023-draft-mid-season-board/

Bit of a contrarian take here,I've posted some of his stuff before and the guy who wrote it is pretty anti social so don't go reading into his non basketball posts, but he is a stats nerd who also likes to watch film and compare archetypes of players to other NBA guys and then look at their stats in college as a comparison. I love reading his scouting takes (his other stuff is fairly painful) and his big boards tend to be significantly better at predicting NBA success than the Ford's, ESPN, NBA draftnet, etc. which all tend to regurgitate each other.

This was posted several weeks ago, but it gives a good insight into certain prospects and why to be higher on them or lower.

Things I don't understand, he spends the whole time crapping on Nick Smith in his write up, and nearly his whole write up praising Brandin Podziemski, yet puts Smith one spot above Brandin. There's a few others where I don't understand the ranking vs writing.
I'm quite a bit lower on Kyle F. and Cason Wallace, while much higher on Brandin.


He actually liked Podz more than Jalen Williams. At least he tweeted that recently. Man also has ideas for Toronto with Cason being his target for us:

Read on Twitter


I just take it all with a grain of salt because he is narrow focused. He has labelled not one but both Thompson twins as "do not draft". The logic is pretty flawed because they haven't tested themselves against true competition.

I wrote about the Thompson Twins and how their top 4 hype is massively unjustified given their low tier competition. I simply would not draft them because it is anti-meritocracy to take 20 year olds playing high school competition over guys who are actually testing themselves against their peers. There is likely a certain point in the draft where it is a reasonable value proposition to take them, but that point is almost certainly going to be after their actual selections since the market seems to massively overvalue them. So the efficient thing to do is to pass and draft somebody who actually has evidence of competent play against their peers.


He is almost strictly a college bball guy and loves seeing a track record. He rarely dicusses int guys because he has no stats to riff of of.

I think for Smith Jr., Dean looking at 9 games of film, a couple injuries and writing the prospect off as not really worth a lotto pick. He said he had bad high school stats yet, Smith Jr. was Player of the Year (2021 and 2022) and averaged 26.5 points, 8.0 rebounds and 7.3 assists. Top five consensus player yet he won't crack lotto.
Yallbecrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,855
And1: 5,534
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#485 » by Yallbecrazy » Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:51 pm

Dalek wrote:
Yallbecrazy wrote:https://deanondraft.com/2023/02/08/2023-draft-mid-season-board/

Bit of a contrarian take here,I've posted some of his stuff before and the guy who wrote it is pretty anti social so don't go reading into his non basketball posts, but he is a stats nerd who also likes to watch film and compare archetypes of players to other NBA guys and then look at their stats in college as a comparison. I love reading his scouting takes (his other stuff is fairly painful) and his big boards tend to be significantly better at predicting NBA success than the Ford's, ESPN, NBA draftnet, etc. which all tend to regurgitate each other.

This was posted several weeks ago, but it gives a good insight into certain prospects and why to be higher on them or lower.

Things I don't understand, he spends the whole time crapping on Nick Smith in his write up, and nearly his whole write up praising Brandin Podziemski, yet puts Smith one spot above Brandin. There's a few others where I don't understand the ranking vs writing.
I'm quite a bit lower on Kyle F. and Cason Wallace, while much higher on Brandin.


He actually liked Podz more than Jalen Williams. At least he tweeted that recently. Man also has ideas for Toronto with Cason being his target for us:

Read on Twitter


I just take it all with a grain of salt because he is narrow focused. He has labelled not one but both Thompson twins as "do not draft". The logic is pretty flawed because they haven't tested themselves against true competition.

I wrote about the Thompson Twins and how their top 4 hype is massively unjustified given their low tier competition. I simply would not draft them because it is anti-meritocracy to take 20 year olds playing high school competition over guys who are actually testing themselves against their peers. There is likely a certain point in the draft where it is a reasonable value proposition to take them, but that point is almost certainly going to be after their actual selections since the market seems to massively overvalue them. So the efficient thing to do is to pass and draft somebody who actually has evidence of competent play against their peers.


He is almost strictly a college bball guy and loves seeing a track record. He rarely dicusses int guys because he has no stats to riff of of.

I think for Smith Jr., Dean looking at 9 games of film, a couple injuries and writing the prospect off as not really worth a lotto pick. He said he had bad high school stats yet, Smith Jr. was Player of the Year (2021 and 2022) and averaged 26.5 points, 8.0 rebounds and 7.3 assists. Top five consensus player yet he won't crack lotto.


He wrote a long post about the Thompson twins here: https://deanondraft.com/2023/02/02/how-good-are-the-thompson-twins/

I am inclined to agree with it, if you look back at most top high school recruits ranked in the 3-12 range and see where they are in the NBA 6 years later...most aren't. 80-90% of top high school recruits don't end being good NBA players depending on the year. Right there there's reason to not pick them in the lottery. Also, they can't shoot and in his long write up he wrote they aren't doing that well statistically relative to other top recruits who have played against some of their competition despite being much younger than the twins.

They are a mystery box, but I would put the odds of them being anywhere on a NBA roster in 6 years at under 25%.

As for Nick Smith, his stats are poor in college so he was a top high school recruit who in a small sample size is showing to be more likely than the average top HS recruit to be a bust.

He does do a fair amount of intl scouting, but only on guys in the top Euro leagues as it is easier to compare. Also, when Euros are drafted who aren't playing in those leagues they bust almost always so that's not really a flaw.
He did have Sengun fairly high two years ago and had Jokic I think in the top 15 in his draft year.

He also at one point had Doncic as the best prospect ever, even ahead of Lebron if you looked at them pre-draft which makes sense. I feel like Lebron hit his 99th percentile outcome and Luka has not because his shooting hasn't really improved enough.
Dalek
RealGM
Posts: 13,877
And1: 10,677
Joined: Jan 24, 2005
Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
 

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#486 » by Dalek » Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:20 pm

Yallbecrazy wrote:He wrote a long post about the Thompson twins here: https://deanondraft.com/2023/02/02/how-good-are-the-thompson-twins/

I am inclined to agree with it, if you look back at most top high school recruits ranked in the 3-12 range and see where they are in the NBA 6 years later...most aren't. 80-90% of top high school recruits don't end being good NBA players depending on the year. Right there there's reason to not pick them in the lottery. Also, they can't shoot and in his long write up he wrote they aren't doing that well statistically relative to other top recruits who have played against some of their competition despite being much younger than the twins.

They are a mystery box, but I would put the odds of them being anywhere on a NBA roster in 6 years at under 25%.

As for Nick Smith, his stats are poor in college so he was a top high school recruit who in a small sample size is showing to be more likely than the average top HS recruit to be a bust.


Dean sums up his views pretty succienctly:

In general, it would be more efficient for teams to pass on players who shied away from facing real competition. James Wiseman left the NCAA after 3 good games and has been a disaster for the Warriors. Shaedon Sharpe never played for UK, and while he is still very young the early NBA returns are not great as he has arguably been the worst player in the league as a rookie. And now instead of playing any proven route of NCAA, G-League, or international, the Thompsons have chosen to see if they can beat up 100 kindergarteners.


I do trust the eye test and a player like Sharpe will eventually get it because the NBA develops raw talent and unless you are not a good athlete and severely lack skill you will improve.

Amen is a top tier athlete that hasn't played the best competition. So him and his brother have to play in a weak league. It is not unlike playing in second or third division leagues in Europe. There are always going to be mystery box players, but when a consensus of draft writers seems to have a player in the high lotto, you kind of think the consensus has it right.

Nick Smith has played two sets of about 5 games each in college while recovering from injuries. In his two last games he scored 24 and 26 points while shooting 7-11 from three. I think the judgement on Smith Jr. is a bit early to say anything about being a bust.

The NBA used to draft out of highschool. LBJ, Garnett, Kobe, TMac, Dwight Howard all came to the NBA without playing college and there were busts but now evaluation is practically from grade school. The NBA knows these players inside and out for the most part.
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,665
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#487 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:59 pm

Gradey Dick is on ESPN at 9pm tonight
User avatar
UnbelievablyRAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,882
And1: 4,664
Joined: Oct 29, 2011
     

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#488 » by UnbelievablyRAW » Wed Mar 1, 2023 12:14 am

Yallbecrazy wrote:https://deanondraft.com/2023/02/08/2023-draft-mid-season-board/

Bit of a contrarian take here,I've posted some of his stuff before and the guy who wrote it is pretty anti social so don't go reading into his non basketball posts, but he is a stats nerd who also likes to watch film and compare archetypes of players to other NBA guys and then look at their stats in college as a comparison. I love reading his scouting takes (his other stuff is fairly painful) and his big boards tend to be significantly better at predicting NBA success than the Ford's, ESPN, NBA draftnet, etc. which all tend to regurgitate each other.

This was posted several weeks ago, but it gives a good insight into certain prospects and why to be higher on them or lower.

Things I don't understand, he spends the whole time crapping on Nick Smith in his write up, and nearly his whole write up praising Brandin Podziemski, yet puts Smith one spot above Brandin. There's a few others where I don't understand the ranking vs writing.
I'm quite a bit lower on Kyle F. and Cason Wallace, while much higher on Brandin.


Thanks for sharing. Feel the exact same way when I look at Walker vs Hendricks. Idk how Walker gets so much more hype when he looks like a better Isaiah Stewart
"Above average role player is now being paid like a superstar from one good playoff series. This will end up as one of the worst contracts in the league." paulbball on Pascal Siakam
Dalek
RealGM
Posts: 13,877
And1: 10,677
Joined: Jan 24, 2005
Location: At the elbow - dropping dimes
 

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#489 » by Dalek » Wed Mar 1, 2023 12:34 am

UnbelievablyRAW wrote:
Yallbecrazy wrote:https://deanondraft.com/2023/02/08/2023-draft-mid-season-board/

Bit of a contrarian take here,I've posted some of his stuff before and the guy who wrote it is pretty anti social so don't go reading into his non basketball posts, but he is a stats nerd who also likes to watch film and compare archetypes of players to other NBA guys and then look at their stats in college as a comparison. I love reading his scouting takes (his other stuff is fairly painful) and his big boards tend to be significantly better at predicting NBA success than the Ford's, ESPN, NBA draftnet, etc. which all tend to regurgitate each other.

This was posted several weeks ago, but it gives a good insight into certain prospects and why to be higher on them or lower.

Things I don't understand, he spends the whole time crapping on Nick Smith in his write up, and nearly his whole write up praising Brandin Podziemski, yet puts Smith one spot above Brandin. There's a few others where I don't understand the ranking vs writing.
I'm quite a bit lower on Kyle F. and Cason Wallace, while much higher on Brandin.


Thanks for sharing. Feel the exact same way when I look at Walker vs Hendricks. Idk how Walker gets so much more hype when he looks like a better Isaiah Stewart


I get that saying Jarace Walker is a 'better Isaiah Stewart' is funny because he might look physically similar to him, but what is with the comp? Is it based on actually watching Walker play? Walker shoots threes and passes the ball like a point-forward. Stewart is a C and strictly guards only that position. Walker is closer to Paul Millsap.

Also a bit lost in this Walker versus Hendricks thing is Hendricks plays 35 mins, while Walker only plays 27 mins. Walker does a lot in his limited minutes on a 27-2 team. While Hendricks plays on a 16-12 team that I don't think is even ranked.

If we look at 36 minute stats Walker would have advantages in rebounds, steals, and assists and DBPM. Walker also has about 10-15 lbs which allows him to be a small ball C. Hendricks is nice but he is a SF/PF at the next level.
User avatar
UnbelievablyRAW
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,882
And1: 4,664
Joined: Oct 29, 2011
     

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#490 » by UnbelievablyRAW » Wed Mar 1, 2023 12:43 am

Dalek wrote:
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:
Yallbecrazy wrote:https://deanondraft.com/2023/02/08/2023-draft-mid-season-board/

Bit of a contrarian take here,I've posted some of his stuff before and the guy who wrote it is pretty anti social so don't go reading into his non basketball posts, but he is a stats nerd who also likes to watch film and compare archetypes of players to other NBA guys and then look at their stats in college as a comparison. I love reading his scouting takes (his other stuff is fairly painful) and his big boards tend to be significantly better at predicting NBA success than the Ford's, ESPN, NBA draftnet, etc. which all tend to regurgitate each other.

This was posted several weeks ago, but it gives a good insight into certain prospects and why to be higher on them or lower.

Things I don't understand, he spends the whole time crapping on Nick Smith in his write up, and nearly his whole write up praising Brandin Podziemski, yet puts Smith one spot above Brandin. There's a few others where I don't understand the ranking vs writing.
I'm quite a bit lower on Kyle F. and Cason Wallace, while much higher on Brandin.


Thanks for sharing. Feel the exact same way when I look at Walker vs Hendricks. Idk how Walker gets so much more hype when he looks like a better Isaiah Stewart


I get that saying Jarace Walker is a 'better Isaiah Stewart' is funny because he might look physically similar to him, but what is with the comp? Is it based on actually watching Walker play? Walker shoots threes and passes the ball like a point-forward. Stewart is a C and strictly guards only that position. Walker is closer to Paul Millsap.

Also a bit lost in this Walker versus Hendricks thing is Hendricks plays 35 mins, while Walker only plays 27 mins. Walker does a lot in his limited minutes on a 27-2 team. While Hendricks plays on a 16-12 team that I don't think is even ranked.

If we look at 36 minute stats Walker would have advantages in rebounds, steals, and assists and DBPM. Walker also has about 10-15 lbs which allows him to be a small ball C. Hendricks is nice but he is a SF/PF at the next level.


Okay I was hyperbolic with the Isaiah Stewart comp :lol:

I don't believe the shooting. Hes a 60%FT shooter and is in the mid 30's from 3 with low volume. Hendricks beats him in every efficiency metric and his real shooting ability can make him viable on any lineup. Hendricks is also a better lateral defender even if he's smaller in weight and strength.

Houston has obviously better talent than UCF, but in their matchups Hendricks has been able to contain Wallace whereas Hendricks had good games and even blew by Wallace once in their head to head. He also outplayed Wallace in both games

He is a solid passer and an amazing switch defender but I don't see him anchoring a defense as a small 5. Just don't think thats worth taking over Hendricks even if they're different positions. Just from a BPA perspective
"Above average role player is now being paid like a superstar from one good playoff series. This will end up as one of the worst contracts in the league." paulbball on Pascal Siakam
Mark_83
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,835
And1: 3,881
Joined: Jun 26, 2008

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#491 » by Mark_83 » Wed Mar 1, 2023 1:52 am

Dalek wrote:
UnbelievablyRAW wrote:
Yallbecrazy wrote:https://deanondraft.com/2023/02/08/2023-draft-mid-season-board/

Bit of a contrarian take here,I've posted some of his stuff before and the guy who wrote it is pretty anti social so don't go reading into his non basketball posts, but he is a stats nerd who also likes to watch film and compare archetypes of players to other NBA guys and then look at their stats in college as a comparison. I love reading his scouting takes (his other stuff is fairly painful) and his big boards tend to be significantly better at predicting NBA success than the Ford's, ESPN, NBA draftnet, etc. which all tend to regurgitate each other.

This was posted several weeks ago, but it gives a good insight into certain prospects and why to be higher on them or lower.

Things I don't understand, he spends the whole time crapping on Nick Smith in his write up, and nearly his whole write up praising Brandin Podziemski, yet puts Smith one spot above Brandin. There's a few others where I don't understand the ranking vs writing.
I'm quite a bit lower on Kyle F. and Cason Wallace, while much higher on Brandin.


Thanks for sharing. Feel the exact same way when I look at Walker vs Hendricks. Idk how Walker gets so much more hype when he looks like a better Isaiah Stewart


I get that saying Jarace Walker is a 'better Isaiah Stewart' is funny because he might look physically similar to him, but what is with the comp? Is it based on actually watching Walker play? Walker shoots threes and passes the ball like a point-forward. Stewart is a C and strictly guards only that position. Walker is closer to Paul Millsap.

Also a bit lost in this Walker versus Hendricks thing is Hendricks plays 35 mins, while Walker only plays 27 mins. Walker does a lot in his limited minutes on a 27-2 team. While Hendricks plays on a 16-12 team that I don't think is even ranked.

If we look at 36 minute stats Walker would have advantages in rebounds, steals, and assists and DBPM. Walker also has about 10-15 lbs which allows him to be a small ball C. Hendricks is nice but he is a SF/PF at the next level.

I would file this under "players look similar so they must play similar" category. Big Stew is a big, rugged, slow-footed C/PF who can sometimes shoot the 3. Wallace is a switchable wing/PF who just happens to be built like a brick wall. He's not nearly as physical as Stew, but infinitely more skilled and athletic.
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,665
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#492 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Wed Mar 1, 2023 3:11 am

Dick struggling from the field he is 0-4 but he has 5 rebounds and 2 blocks at the half which is a great sign.
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,665
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#493 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Wed Mar 1, 2023 3:12 am

JHS following up his big game with another stinker. I'm not sold on the kid at all.

Nick Smith 33% from the field at the half 0 rebounds 0 assists 0 steals 0 blocks 2 turnovers
Yallbecrazy
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,855
And1: 5,534
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#494 » by Yallbecrazy » Wed Mar 1, 2023 3:16 am

Black and Nick Smith having horror shows of a game so far vs Tennessee
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,665
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#495 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Wed Mar 1, 2023 3:29 am

Texas Tech down 4 to Kansas with 14 mins left they're actually in this
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,665
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#496 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Wed Mar 1, 2023 3:30 am

Wow Gradey dick just put the ball on the floor and dropped a sweet dime to his big man

Dude can't hit a shot tonight though. Let's see if he can at least nail a few in the clutch.
User avatar
Brinbe
RealGM
Posts: 66,179
And1: 40,936
Joined: Feb 26, 2005
Location: Terana
         

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#497 » by Brinbe » Wed Mar 1, 2023 3:32 am

that's pretty much the case with most of these guys, no real consistency from game to game.
Image
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,665
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#498 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Wed Mar 1, 2023 3:36 am

Kansas is in serious trouble right now
REJECTEDBYCLARK
Head Coach
Posts: 6,514
And1: 4,665
Joined: Jan 25, 2023

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#499 » by REJECTEDBYCLARK » Wed Mar 1, 2023 3:58 am

I wish the Raps had a coach like Bill Self.
NotMyKawhi
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,958
And1: 5,216
Joined: Jul 13, 2018

Re: Re: 2023 Draft Prospect discussion Part II 

Post#500 » by NotMyKawhi » Wed Mar 1, 2023 4:04 am

why are you guys obsessed w Gradey Dick?

He's gonna be average in he league at best. So many players in college way better than him

If its a white thing, wait for Cooper Flagg. That guy is actually the best american white guy since Bird

Return to Toronto Raptors